Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)

41. Well it would probably be mandatory

Reply to Eko (Reply #40)

Tue Jul 19, 2016, 05:44 PM

Jul 2016

With UBC. just curious.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

50 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"No divisive group attacks" Hmmm, wonder if it applies to Democrat Gun owners on DU? [View all] DonP Jun 2016 OP

or pit bull vs nopit bulls hollysmom Jun 2016 #1

So gun grabber would be right out Buzz cook Jun 2016 #2

I think that's about right The Green Manalishi Jun 2016 #4

Excellent question, Don -- this will be interesting to follow. pablo_marmol Jun 2016 #3

I could be wrong but ..... DonP Jun 2016 #5

I could name several who really should be carefull of what they say. n/t oneshooter Jun 2016 #6

My guess, they still figure on the jury system to cover their ass DonP Jun 2016 #7

I expect little change. nt Eleanors38 Jun 2016 #10

Turns out, your expectations have been met: friendly_iconoclast Jun 2016 #14

Change the rules all you want, but there is always special dispensation in DU. Eleanors38 Jun 2016 #16

2A progressives along with believers will always be fair game. ileus Jun 2016 #8

We shall see how it goes Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #9

I had a post, I made here, hidden for using the word "grabber" Press Virginia Jun 2016 #11

As does "ammosexual" n/t oneshooter Jun 2016 #12

It will ALL be back, sticky floors and all. Eleanors38 Jun 2016 #17

"Assault penis" Puha Ekapi Jun 2016 #20

Of course not- read the linked OP and comments- but not if you have high blood pressure: friendly_iconoclast Jun 2016 #13

I alerted on an attack directed at me Duckhunter935 Jun 2016 #15

There's not much point in alerting. Straw Man Jun 2016 #18

I've noticed a lot of "selective enforcement" RME_SFC Jun 2016 #19

Nope, business as usual sarisataka Jul 2016 #21

Skinner still refuses to answer Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #22

There is a very sarisataka Jul 2016 #24

Yes, it is interesting Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #25

Agreed. But, it is a clear sign of their ongoing impotence DonP Jul 2016 #23

I saw that Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #27

There are those of us who are gun owners Eko Jul 2016 #26

What type(s) of firearm do you own, and why? Marengo Jul 2016 #31

A Pistol. Eko Jul 2016 #32

Did you have a background check performed? Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #33

On what? Eko Jul 2016 #35

That firearms transfer Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #37

Why would I do that? Eko Jul 2016 #40

Well it would probably be mandatory Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #41

Interesting. Eko Jul 2016 #42

Universal Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #43

Most people Eko Jul 2016 #44

Yep, I tend to agree Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #45

So Eko Jul 2016 #46

Never tried to set you up Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #47

Ok. Eko Jul 2016 #48

Democratic gun owners - many are here and have been for over a decade blm Jul 2016 #28

Just hard to decide where that "common sense" line is for many people DonP Jul 2016 #29

Let me know when you find out Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #38

No, it does not. n/t oneshooter Jul 2016 #30

Such capriciousness shows they cannot be trusted to justly administer the laws they demand. Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2016 #34

"Vindictive and cruel" is a component of gun control... beevul Jul 2016 #36

No, of course not Duckhunter935 Jul 2016 #39

May I ask a question? Kang Colby Jul 2016 #49

But....but....but......... pablo_marmol Jul 2016 #50