Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Always Right

(84 posts)
47. All ideas are welcome
Mon Feb 26, 2018, 04:49 PM
Feb 2018

I support your idea for national healthcare for the mentally ill in theory though I'd like to see some specifics of what you envision. Are we talking free room, board and treatment at national sanitariums?

What you called a loophole, I'd call a system failure as the situations I described were not excluded from the law or a work around, rather, it was a government employee failing to do their job.

It may seem like I've thrown up my hands but I don't know how you can get the police or military to do their job by passing new laws as the military is already required by law to report dishonorable discharges. Who pays the severe fine or gets thrown in jail for that? What about when police fail to go in to protect kids? Throw the deputies in jail for failing to act? Do that and see who still wants to be a deputy.

Non-gun enthusiasts are welcome to contribute to the conversation provided that they are open to facts and not blinded by emotions. For example, you said that the rules should be different for one's local. What happens when someone moves from a rural location to an urban location? Do they then have to re-qualify to keep their legally possessed property?

I see psych exams as a back door gun ban because all it will take is one doctor to get sued after he passes someone who then commits a gun crime. Then no more doctors are going to sign off on anyone unless they are rich and/or politically connected. That is essentially what happened with the National Firearms Act where the local chief law enforcement officer was required to sign the form stating they know of no local laws that would be violated. That was put in place because there were no computer databases of laws back then. Didn't take long til the cops just refused to sign then nobody but the connected got their forms signed.

Also, who decides what the psych criteria is to own a gun as plenty on this board think anyone who wants to own a gun is crazy.

How does a safety course prevent school shootings?

How does a personal reference help? Presumably the references will be given by the gun purchaser and I can't see how they would provide names of people who would say bad things. Just like on a resume, nobody lists references they know will say bad things.

As for "assault weapons", that is the buzz word of the day to attempt to demonize some particular subset of guns. However it is being misapplied to semi auto look a like guns that resemble full auto military assault weapons.

These so called assault weapons you feel should be subject to heavy regulation are only cosmetically different than other semi auto guns. That is why when there was an assault weapon ban (AWB) from 1994 to 2004, it was totally ineffective. That Because the ban attempted to differentiate between the banned guns and non-banned guns so being cosmetically different, it listed the "bad" cosmetic features. It didn't take long for the bad cosmetic features to be removed and so the guns were unbanned.

For example, the AWB prohibited bayonet lugs (a metal notch to attach a bayonet), threaded muzzles, flash hiders, telescoping stocks, so the guns had their bayonet lugs removed, the muzzles were left unthreaded, flash hiders were replaced with muzzle brakes and the telescoping stocks were made to no longer telescope and left in the fixed position. Essentially the gun was exactly the same and used the same ammo. The AWB did nothing.

Last comment on the AR-15. It uses the .223 Remington or the Nato 5.56 mm cartridge, which are about the lowest power rifle cartridges presently in production. In fact, I can only think of two or three less powerful cartridges while there are over 100 more powerful ones so every time I see an AR-15 called High Powered it is a lie. In fact, it is why the AR-15 was never really used for hunting as it is so much less powerful than traditional hunting guns. Note: There are some companies making a new type of ammo called 300 blackout that can be used in an AR-15 but that requires changing out some essential parts of the gun and the gun is in fact becoming popular for hunting animals no larger than hogs.

I would hope that any new regulations you put in place would equally be applied to the police and military as well since we they would also have access to guns.

Anyway, we are in agreement on healthcare for the mentally ill and that the present system failed us and that prohibited people need to be flagged, what we differ on is that I don't think additional obstacles need to be put in place to ownership that are not somehow directly designed to block criminal and crazies from getting weapons.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

How many friendships have you had to end [View all] flibbitygiblets Feb 2018 OP
Bff from high school since 1975 DUgosh Feb 2018 #1
What's the definition of gun fever? Watchfoxheadexplodes Feb 2018 #2
Sounds like you prefer to live in a self-imposed bubble, honestly. Decoy of Fenris Feb 2018 #3
Not what OP said at all. I think you only understood .223% of it. flamin lib Feb 2018 #5
He's cut ties with "dozens" of people, including close friends. Decoy of Fenris Feb 2018 #8
I think you took a few liberties there flibbitygiblets Feb 2018 #12
Just going by what you said, mate. Decoy of Fenris Feb 2018 #15
Your awesome math notwithstanding flibbitygiblets Feb 2018 #35
Who's trying to disprove your legitimacy? I'm taking you at 100% face value. Decoy of Fenris Feb 2018 #38
You do know that we can read the shit you said about me above, right? flibbitygiblets Feb 2018 #41
"Mildly" civil. That's a step above "indifferent" and significantly above "actively hostile." Decoy of Fenris Feb 2018 #42
Lol. flibbitygiblets Feb 2018 #46
You can't take the gun demagoguery out of it. The OP is separating him/herself from flamin lib Feb 2018 #25
But smokers do not spend all their waking moments telling you about the wonders of tobacco DBoon Feb 2018 #29
There is a similarity in that secondhand smoke flibbitygiblets Feb 2018 #37
actually, no... tortoise1956 Feb 2018 #65
"Gun nuttery affects...." guillaumeb Feb 2018 #54
I don't think that's the only answer... tortoise1956 Feb 2018 #67
Not knowing what "gun fever" is, I'd still say "none." I treasure those with whom I can dig into WhiskeyGrinder Feb 2018 #4
My shooting friends are mature educated professions. So "none" would be my answer. nt hack89 Feb 2018 #6
Not all my friends melm00se Feb 2018 #7
If I cut ties with my trump supporter friends and family Watchfoxheadexplodes Feb 2018 #9
I'm really sorry to hear that flibbitygiblets Feb 2018 #13
I'll try again. flibbitygiblets Feb 2018 #10
So gun fever equals no compromise? Watchfoxheadexplodes Feb 2018 #14
Excellent explanation. Paladin Feb 2018 #16
Thanks for that. I feel like I stumbled into a bees nest flibbitygiblets Feb 2018 #19
There's plenty of misunderstanding at this locale. You're not part of it. (nt) Paladin Feb 2018 #20
Nope, you're right on target, mate. Decoy of Fenris Feb 2018 #22
Have you considered agreeing to disagree with them? Decoy of Fenris Feb 2018 #17
Of course. But I don't tolerate bullying flibbitygiblets Feb 2018 #24
It's not that we're "meaner", Flibbity, we're just tired of having to fight on two fronts. Decoy of Fenris Feb 2018 #31
Ever receive death threats from "the batshit lunatic fringe of the left wing"? Paladin Feb 2018 #36
Of course. Right here on DU, from the Gun Control side. Decoy of Fenris Feb 2018 #39
Are some posters on DU sarisataka Feb 2018 #49
I believe the phrase that got one such poster banned was ... Straw Man Feb 2018 #63
Well here's a thought flibbitygiblets Feb 2018 #44
The people that want to arm teachers have a terrible idea krispos42 Mar 2018 #75
None, and what is this "gun fever"? To quote the sage, ... JustABozoOnThisBus Feb 2018 #11
Tell the parents of the children who got killed to lighten up flibbitygiblets Feb 2018 #30
No sarisataka Feb 2018 #18
You'll stop caring how many people die flibbitygiblets Feb 2018 #21
I never stop caring how many people die sarisataka Feb 2018 #23
Well then it sounds like you are very lucky flibbitygiblets Feb 2018 #27
Never again has a very different meaning to me. SQUEE Feb 2018 #69
Had to end 3 MFM008 Feb 2018 #26
When I was single I stopped dating a guy because he loved taking his gun everywhere kimbutgar Feb 2018 #28
Sounds like you made a sensible decision... tortoise1956 Feb 2018 #66
No in the cooler kimbutgar Feb 2018 #70
At least 5, 2 were good friends from high school. redstatebluegirl Feb 2018 #32
Who initiated those gun control discussions, them or you? Always Right Feb 2018 #33
Glad you asked! They initiated. flibbitygiblets Feb 2018 #40
Since we are having a civilized conversation, what do you propose specifically? Always Right Feb 2018 #43
Sounds like you have some answers right in your post flibbitygiblets Feb 2018 #45
All ideas are welcome Always Right Feb 2018 #47
Oh and prohibit the NRA from funding politicians flibbitygiblets Feb 2018 #48
If you "prohibit the NRA from funding politicians" oneshooter Feb 2018 #50
I'm cool with that flibbitygiblets Feb 2018 #55
Ah, yes. Straw Man Feb 2018 #64
IIRC, the Journal News had some of the dish they were serving fed back to them... friendly_iconoclast Feb 2018 #71
None Alea Feb 2018 #34
None. BlueTsunami2018 Feb 2018 #51
ZERO ..... LenaBaby61 Feb 2018 #52
None for gun fever. Several for "other" reasons... Kajun Gal Feb 2018 #53
Zero. None of my friends or family are gun nuts. SharonClark Feb 2018 #56
Sounds like chumpchange Feb 2018 #57
Yeah pretty shallow, dumping a gun nut flibbitygiblets Feb 2018 #58
I read what you wrote chumpchange Feb 2018 #59
I routinely block people out of my life who travel with guns or post pictures of themselves MaryMagdaline Feb 2018 #60
Personally, I would never alter a friendship on the basis of politics The Mouth Feb 2018 #61
That sounds about right to me. Straw Man Feb 2018 #62
Why would... Puha Ekapi_2 Feb 2018 #68
None...that would be silly. ileus Feb 2018 #72
zero, gejohnston Mar 2018 #73
None ileus Mar 2018 #74
Just one... sweetloukillbot Mar 2018 #76
None. Snackshack Mar 2018 #77
I was out with a friend this week MichMary Mar 2018 #78
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»How many friendships have...»Reply #47