Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(147,636 posts)
24. Now that's a worthwhile goal. Lipinski is, perhaps, my least favorite DEM House member.
Wed Nov 28, 2018, 02:38 PM
Nov 2018

Perhaps in 2020. I did not know you lived in that district.

Can still try ck4829 Nov 2018 #1
How derivative. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #2
Not derivative. A direct response to your thread. MineralMan Nov 2018 #3
The substance is lacking. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #4
Balderdash and codswallop. MineralMan Nov 2018 #5
Exactly. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #6
Codswallop, ok shit, now I have to look that one up Eliot Rosewater Nov 2018 #10
I must admit to being unfamiliar with the 2 words. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #20
Balderdash is an oldie but a goodie but that other one...LOL Eliot Rosewater Nov 2018 #22
That sounds like a plan. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #23
Now that's a worthwhile goal. Lipinski is, perhaps, my least favorite DEM House member. MineralMan Nov 2018 #24
I worked for Newman's campaign. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #32
It didn't work. MineralMan Nov 2018 #34
As long as the person you get nominated doesnt have a poorer chance of beating the con. Eliot Rosewater Nov 2018 #25
Lipinski lost to Newman in the suburbs, and won by name recognition in the city. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #33
Oh may, words saidsimplesimon Nov 2018 #52
Fortunately, we have Google now. MineralMan Nov 2018 #55
LOL! And yet you never replied in your own thread MineralMan Nov 2018 #7
marylandblue did an excellent job of making my case. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #8
But you did not. MineralMan Nov 2018 #9
The author made my case. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #15
So, am I to take it that articles you excerpt in posts MineralMan Nov 2018 #16
Never assume. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #17
So, I've been right all along, then? MineralMan Nov 2018 #18
One of the constants of your posts is in evidence. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #19
Well, I'm glad we cleared that up, MineralMan Nov 2018 #21
Horseshit Major Nikon Nov 2018 #40
From YOUR own history: guillaumeb Nov 2018 #45
Great job of not actually reading what you replied to Major Nikon Nov 2018 #46
Actual history. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #47
Actual horseshit as usual Major Nikon Nov 2018 #48
Yes, yes. Mariana Nov 2018 #54
And the abolitionists were theists. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #60
Yes, yes, you already said that. Mariana Nov 2018 #61
Theists are humans. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #62
No shit Sherlock. Mariana Nov 2018 #63
People will do what they wish to do. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #64
"But progressive theists were involve in every progressive movement in the US," MineralMan Nov 2018 #65
Today, we know who it is Mariana Nov 2018 #68
That is most certainly true, to quote Martin Luther. MineralMan Nov 2018 #70
The point is progressive religious populism. Not progresive atheists. guillaumeb Nov 2018 #69
But you seemed to think the theism Mariana Nov 2018 #66
Right... Act_of_Reparation Nov 2018 #67
Not sure what you mean by "won't work." wryter2000 Nov 2018 #11
I mean "won't work" as in "won't be effective in winning." MineralMan Nov 2018 #12
Well, we're pretty much ignored wryter2000 Nov 2018 #13
I attended services at an Episcopal church for a while, MineralMan Nov 2018 #14
Majority of voters are Christian qazplm135 Nov 2018 #26
Yes, exactly. Which is what Trump did. MineralMan Nov 2018 #27
And progressive Christians turned out for Hillary qazplm135 Nov 2018 #31
Still, the majority of Christian voters cast their ballots for Trump. Mariana Nov 2018 #35
really? qazplm135 Nov 2018 #36
Yes, really. Mariana Nov 2018 #37
so Obama won Catholics twice qazplm135 Nov 2018 #38
The Roman Catholic Church is extremely misogynist. Mariana Nov 2018 #39
I'm pretty sure misogyny is not responsible for the qazplm135 Nov 2018 #41
Yes, most. Mariana Nov 2018 #43
so if it were 51-49 qazplm135 Nov 2018 #44
No, I don't define it as "most". Mariana Nov 2018 #50
You're being disingenuous qazplm135 Nov 2018 #57
The only reason the RCC numbers are different is because of Hispanics Major Nikon Nov 2018 #49
And they are quite enough to outnumber the rest. Mariana Nov 2018 #51
Even those aren't too far behind Major Nikon Nov 2018 #53
I think you are right. Mariana Nov 2018 #56
Not just theists, but they seem to be the worst Major Nikon Nov 2018 #59
Your statistical analysis is quite lacking Major Nikon Nov 2018 #42
The Catholic Church is not its hierarchy. Those in the pews Hassler Nov 2018 #28
And yet, there they are, sitting in the pews and filling the plates. Mariana Nov 2018 #29
Some of them are. Some of them on some issues. MineralMan Nov 2018 #30
Actually the RCC is in fact it's hierarchy. Voltaire2 Nov 2018 #58
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Why Progressive Religious...»Reply #24