Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: China Sends 1.1 Million Party Members to Share Uighurs' Homes [View all]Major Nikon
(36,904 posts)35. I didn't ask you to repeat your argle-bargle
The question I asked is in post #25 and you haven't answered it. Seems immature to pretend otherwise. Also seems immature to pretend I'm not talking about your OP. If you don't want to answer the question, just say you don't want to answer the question. It's not as if anyone is going to be surprised by that behavior. Most people here already know you're all about giving sermons without any meaningful discussion.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
114 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So now I have to comment on the article itself and not the editorial comments in the OP?
Major Nikon
Jan 2019
#10
The article does deal with the terrible tactics employed by the Chinese Government.
guillaumeb
Jan 2019
#11
And yet when humans behave decently, you never hesitate to give credit to religion.
trotsky
Jan 2019
#18
I think that the leaders of the Chinese Government should not be totalitarians.
guillaumeb
Jan 2019
#28
Blaming your refusal to engage in discussion on someone else is also revealing
Major Nikon
Jan 2019
#44
You just keep pointing at the motes in others' eyes while ignoring the plank in your own.
trotsky
Jan 2019
#95
What leads you to assume that the mass of the Chinese people support their own Government?
guillaumeb
Jan 2019
#30