Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marylandblue

(12,344 posts)
35. Gil didn't answer this, but I think it's a good question, so I'll answer.
Fri Feb 1, 2019, 07:26 PM
Feb 2019

I think McConnell is not trustworthy, which has caused a lot of the dysfunction in the Senate. I think Lisa Murkowski is trustworthy. I think Richard Burr may be somewhat trustworthy. He has played the sort of games that Nunes did in the House.

But trustworthy aside, at some point in the future, McConnell will be gone, hopefully Democrats will be in charge again, and we will need to start repairing our country. The real damage Trump has done is destroy the norms that a functioning political system needs to operate. To undo the damage, we will need to re-establish the norms and that means reaching across the aisle.

I don't know if that will actually work, and I don't think we should compromise for compromise's sake, but we'd be better off if we could make it work. Personal relationships in Congress will help that. I am sure there are other personal relationships in Congress that aren't based on religion.

Coon's relationship with Trump is only tangentially about religion, because Trump really isn't religious. It seems more about Coon's friendly and open personality than religion. But it being Religion News, they had to play up the religious angle.

No offense, but when I read this, it infuriated me. 50 Shades Of Blue Jan 2019 #1
I think Coons is interested in building bridges, not walls. guillaumeb Jan 2019 #2
I have zero interest with any bridge that connects MineralMan Jan 2019 #5
A bizarre viewpoint. guillaumeb Jan 2019 #6
Not bizarre at all, given the current obstructionism among Republicans. MineralMan Jan 2019 #7
My observation remains. guillaumeb Jan 2019 #8
Oh, bother. MineralMan Jan 2019 #9
I am still focused on your position, guillaumeb Jan 2019 #10
.. MineralMan Jan 2019 #11
Much better. eom guillaumeb Jan 2019 #12
"your view is fine for a discussion board, but useless in practice" trotsky Jan 2019 #13
Savaging me is impossible. MineralMan Jan 2019 #14
Certainly not when someone like guillaumeb is trying. trotsky Jan 2019 #15
Yes, and I do appreciate that. MineralMan Jan 2019 #16
Yes, the "savaging" accusation. guillaumeb Jan 2019 #19
Yes, that one. trotsky Feb 2019 #32
"Savaging you"? guillaumeb Jan 2019 #18
I didn't claim that. MineralMan Jan 2019 #21
Here: guillaumeb Jan 2019 #22
Oh, wow! MineralMan Jan 2019 #23
Yes, the position is fine here. guillaumeb Jan 2019 #17
Then why do you berate others for doing exactly what you do? trotsky Feb 2019 #31
Yes, your approach to dialogue. guillaumeb Feb 2019 #37
So G? Bretton Garcia Feb 2019 #55
And what do you infer from that? guillaumeb Feb 2019 #57
This message was self-deleted by its author Voltaire2 Feb 2019 #64
My thought is that we live our lives as example WhiteTara Feb 2019 #80
I do not pray here. guillaumeb Feb 2019 #82
Sounds dualistic WhiteTara Feb 2019 #83
Bridges and walls? guillaumeb Feb 2019 #89
"Bridges or walls" Act_of_Reparation Feb 2019 #84
A wall made of sandwiches? guillaumeb Feb 2019 #90
That's rigid binary thinking. trotsky Feb 2019 #85
Some use analogies for enlightenment Major Nikon Feb 2019 #86
Remember, this is the same guy who expects sympathy on DU for a TRUMP SUPPORTER... trotsky Feb 2019 #87
Yeah, wants to "build bridges" to religious wingnuts who are the farthest to the right... Major Nikon Feb 2019 #88
Only you can control your behavior, gil. trotsky Feb 2019 #81
Gil didn't answer this, but I think it's a good question, so I'll answer. marylandblue Feb 2019 #35
I like tacos. Act_of_Reparation Feb 2019 #30
This is very important: guillaumeb Feb 2019 #36
I spent a number of years in San Diego... Act_of_Reparation Feb 2019 #46
I first tried mahi tuna tacos in LA. guillaumeb Feb 2019 #48
It's nauseating horseshit. Voltaire2 Jan 2019 #3
+ 1 3Hotdogs Jan 2019 #4
Compromise is a deadly sin? guillaumeb Jan 2019 #20
Obama spent 8 years desperately trying to Voltaire2 Jan 2019 #24
Yes, he did. guillaumeb Jan 2019 #25
Stop. Voltaire2 Jan 2019 #26
Okay, tell them to stop. guillaumeb Jan 2019 #27
Who Pelosi? She doesn't need my advice. Voltaire2 Jan 2019 #28
What just got done, Guy? The shutdown ended, and Trump's MineralMan Feb 2019 #33
Your reasoning is flawed. guillaumeb Feb 2019 #38
You have convinced yourself of that. MineralMan Feb 2019 #39
Explanation is truly pointless in the face of guillaumeb Feb 2019 #40
LOL! MineralMan Feb 2019 #41
Yes, you do. guillaumeb Feb 2019 #42
Giving cover to Trump is nauseating horseshit muriel_volestrangler Feb 2019 #29
I didn't see anything in the article where Coons compromised with Trump marylandblue Feb 2019 #34
Having a personal connection with Trump is compromising with him muriel_volestrangler Feb 2019 #45
You must have seen a different ad than me, because marylandblue Feb 2019 #49
Trump as a "reasonable person"? guillaumeb Feb 2019 #43
OK, since it takes up more than 4 paragraphs, I'll give it as sections. muriel_volestrangler Feb 2019 #44
It says nothing about Trump being a reasonable person, guillaumeb Feb 2019 #47
"remind himself that Trump is a child of God." marylandblue Feb 2019 #50
Why was Coons at a Trump signing ceremony? muriel_volestrangler Feb 2019 #51
No it's totally different. marylandblue Feb 2019 #52
Not when he turns up to support Trump's photo ops, it isn't muriel_volestrangler Feb 2019 #53
It was a bipartisan anti-human trafficking bill marylandblue Feb 2019 #54
The legislation that drove sex workers Voltaire2 Feb 2019 #56
So your contention is that online sex workers are necessarily free from pimps? guillaumeb Feb 2019 #59
No. That driving the sex trade offline Voltaire2 Feb 2019 #60
Again, a contention with no proof. guillaumeb Feb 2019 #61
Seriously? Voltaire2 Feb 2019 #62
And the various stories about online pimps? guillaumeb Feb 2019 #63
Bring the evidence that this bill has Voltaire2 Feb 2019 #65
Pimps know about the internet. guillaumeb Feb 2019 #66
Bring the evidence that this law has reduced Voltaire2 Feb 2019 #67
Not necesary. guillaumeb Feb 2019 #68
As usual. Voltaire2 Feb 2019 #70
He was with trump at a signing of FOTSA? Lordquinton Feb 2019 #69
The particular event used to gin up the moral outrage was the raid on "backpage". Voltaire2 Feb 2019 #71
A prime example of using religion to oppress people Lordquinton Feb 2019 #77
I believe you are talking about FOSTA or SESTA, which is a different bill marylandblue Feb 2019 #78
See my current signature for what turning up to his photo-ops is like muriel_volestrangler Feb 2019 #76
It is not normalizing Trump. guillaumeb Feb 2019 #58
resist. Voltaire2 Feb 2019 #72
Resist is a good slogan. Short, and dramatic. guillaumeb Feb 2019 #74
Going to a photo-op for him is normalizing him muriel_volestrangler Feb 2019 #73
lock him up. Voltaire2 Feb 2019 #75
I looked at Coons Facebook page, he has a lot of criticism for Trump marylandblue Feb 2019 #79
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»In polarized Washington, ...»Reply #35