Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

guillaumeb

(42,649 posts)
58. Agreed.
Mon Jul 29, 2019, 02:02 PM
Jul 2019

And thank you again for the link to a very interesting argument.

As to the intent of the artists, we can only speculate.

most of the figurines found from before 5000 bce or so are female bloom Jul 2019 #1
In my view, the focus here was on the age of the settlement. eom guillaumeb Jul 2019 #14
FAKE NEWS!!!! AJT Jul 2019 #2
These were 9,000 Biblical years. eom guillaumeb Jul 2019 #7
statuettes and figurines Cartoonist Jul 2019 #3
Some Christians would indeed. guillaumeb Jul 2019 #8
Believing in nonexistent beings is the commonality Cartoonist Jul 2019 #9
Theism is the commonality. guillaumeb Jul 2019 #11
He's saying they believed in an interventionist creator Major Nikon Jul 2019 #16
Religion does indeed have very deep roots. trotsky Jul 2019 #4
Except unlike religion, those things have always gone together with humans Major Nikon Jul 2019 #6
"special niches that might have played a role in ritual." MineralMan Jul 2019 #5
And these funerary rituals, as you know, guillaumeb Jul 2019 #10
Some non-theistic animistic religions also buried MineralMan Jul 2019 #12
To your example, guillaumeb Jul 2019 #13
That does not require theism in any way. MineralMan Jul 2019 #15
... Major Nikon Jul 2019 #17
LOL! Ban Straws! MineralMan Jul 2019 #18
"Obvious" to you perhaps... uriel1972 Jul 2019 #20
Why do you assume 'need'? AtheistCrusader Jul 2019 #28
Because Joe, in the example, is dead. guillaumeb Jul 2019 #30
Doubling down on your *claim* of 'need' doesn't actually demonstrate an actual need. AtheistCrusader Jul 2019 #32
If the objects were in the grave, someone placed them there. guillaumeb Jul 2019 #36
You say that as if the existing studies and claims in this area are not contested at all. AtheistCrusader Jul 2019 #37
Climate change is measurable. guillaumeb Jul 2019 #38
Hence the source of my objection. AtheistCrusader Jul 2019 #55
Belief in some form of afterlife does not require theism. MineralMan Jul 2019 #40
If we can see from the written record that human societies that left a written guillaumeb Jul 2019 #41
You can infer many things from many things. MineralMan Jul 2019 #43
And the same applies to your own inferences. guillaumeb Jul 2019 #45
Buddhism is not theistic muriel_volestrangler Jul 2019 #59
True, but I did not say all societies. eom guillaumeb Jul 2019 #60
'all' was implied by your remark in full muriel_volestrangler Jul 2019 #61
History is not evidence of naturalism. Act_of_Reparation Jul 2019 #19
That they may... MAY have had religion... uriel1972 Jul 2019 #21
It is an argument that theism, and religion, have deep roots. guillaumeb Jul 2019 #22
It's a pathetically poor and biased argument, but yes, it's an argument. trotsky Jul 2019 #57
Is this one of those things where every statuette is assumed to be a 'fertility goddess' without AtheistCrusader Jul 2019 #23
That question is one you might discuss with the actual archeologists guillaumeb Jul 2019 #24
Pointless. If you're in the paradigm, you can't see the paradigm. AtheistCrusader Jul 2019 #25
But this sculptor might have no knowledge of the history of fertility statues, or religious guillaumeb Jul 2019 #26
All true. But there are ways to tell what something might be, from the thing itself. AtheistCrusader Jul 2019 #27
But we cannot truly understand how people from 9,000 years ago really saw some of their artifacts. guillaumeb Jul 2019 #29
You assume too much. It's funny that you decry patriarchal erasure of Mary, but you actually perform AtheistCrusader Jul 2019 #31
And you are not in the paradigm? guillaumeb Jul 2019 #34
I accept that it is a POSSIBILITY, but do not assume it is the actual fact. AtheistCrusader Jul 2019 #35
Here's the 'decolonizing gender' article. I implore you to read it. AtheistCrusader Jul 2019 #33
I did read it. guillaumeb Jul 2019 #39
The intent could be a lot of things. The lack of perspective of an observer of a second person AtheistCrusader Jul 2019 #56
Agreed. guillaumeb Jul 2019 #58
And here we have evidence again edhopper Jul 2019 #42
If religion is innate in humans, guillaumeb Jul 2019 #44
Perhaps this; perhaps that. Before long, you'll MineralMan Jul 2019 #46
And your own belief system? guillaumeb Jul 2019 #47
What belief system is that? MineralMan Jul 2019 #48
You believe that you know, and you have faith that your knowledge allows you guillaumeb Jul 2019 #50
The untold number of edhopper Jul 2019 #49
Perhaps what you see as contradictory the Creator sees guillaumeb Jul 2019 #51
At least in the fable, there was an actual elephant. edhopper Jul 2019 #52
How do you know it was an elephant? eom guillaumeb Jul 2019 #53
that is the fable edhopper Jul 2019 #54
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Israeli archaeologists di...»Reply #58