Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Ancient Wisdom and Pagan Spirituality
In reply to the discussion: Well, here's a little lite reading! The Myth of Monotheism [View all]humblebum
(5,881 posts)39. Yes, objective proof is a bit hard to accept for some, even when it is overwhelming. nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Just how is being "expert in everything who shoots four holes-in-one every time he plays golf."
humblebum
Dec 2011
#11
"god-like status?" That's a pretty ambiguous description. Washington, Lincoln, even MLK have left
humblebum
Dec 2011
#13
"Apparently ol' Jong-Il could control the weather by his mood." And people have still observed
humblebum
Dec 2011
#17
Do you have any idea how many died at the hands of these people or were sent to their deaths
humblebum
Dec 2011
#27
"As an atheist movement bent on spreading atheism in itself" - Yes. That was the stated objective.
humblebum
Dec 2011
#31
Again, because the religious were thought to be a threat to Stalin's power
DissedByBush
Dec 2011
#34
Much was done specifically to impose atheism and in the name of atheism as the the facts prove. And,
humblebum
Dec 2011
#35
If communism had been the "purpose", then all of the signs and slogans would have
humblebum
Dec 2011
#49
If the fact that entire villages were overrun and the religious structure in the villages destroyed
humblebum
Dec 2011
#56
I applaud your effort, but you are dealing with someone who does not want to hear what you say.
cleanhippie
Dec 2011
#38
Yes, objective proof is a bit hard to accept for some, even when it is overwhelming. nt
humblebum
Dec 2011
#39
I agree 100%. It was hijacked with the same old, tired nonsense, that poster spews in R&T.
cleanhippie
Dec 2011
#43
Where is there any mention of Kim as a deity? Marxist-Leninist governments are categorically atheist
humblebum
Dec 2011
#14
Cult of personality is not deity. It is reverence for the achievements and greatness of the person
humblebum
Dec 2011
#18
According to Kim Il-sung,"man is the master of everything and decides everything."
humblebum
Dec 2011
#23
It's also a government based on Marxist-Leninist ideals and installed into power by Stalin
humblebum
Dec 2011
#32
As you note above, they renounced Stalin and came up with their own homegrown idea
DissedByBush
Dec 2011
#33
In that case Lincoln and Washington were gods. But in truth, their constitution still
humblebum
Dec 2011
#36
When it is being implied that monotheism and religion in general are responsible
humblebum
Dec 2011
#44
The absence of mentioning atheism did not mean that the author was ignorant to violence by such.
icymist
Dec 2011
#45
A major declaration of Lenin concerned the importance of establishing state atheism.
humblebum
Dec 2011
#53
In that case, atheism is a religion. Regardless, there is no philosophical difference between
humblebum
Dec 2011
#55
"The USSR still would have done what it did even without atheism because it had a state purpose."
humblebum
Dec 2011
#57
Fuck all of that. Don't you think a single god would create another just to fuck?
HopeHoops
Dec 2011
#9