2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: New Post on Palmer Report...Wisconsin (another update on Waukesha County) [View all]Mc Mike
(9,171 posts)Last edited Mon Dec 12, 2016, 10:34 AM - Edit history (1)
The fact that they separated the registered voter poll books, the "who signed in to vote" documentation, and the ballots at separate tables, and showed no chain of custody for ballots after the ballots were counted, in Waukesha, showed blatant poll count manipulation.
The fact that Barb With took pictures of very unusual time and date stamped poll count tapes, which had vote totals on them used to "prove" the Waukesha count was correct -- and the fact that it was sworn by elections officials (3 times) that the tape was an accurate report of votes cast April 5th, (though it was date/time stamped March 30, at 1:48) -- and the fact that the inclusion of the totals from those tapes was necessary for the Waukesha vote count to officially add up -- all of those facts are blatant evidence of OVERT POLL COUNT MANIPULATIONS.
And then she was told the next day that there WERE no touch screen tapes from Pewaukee. Because they'd served their purpose, and now their existence could only cause trouble, because it looks kind of like they just ran some machines early, made them reflect whatever result they wanted them to reflect, and then included them in the official balloting returns record.
Unfortunately for them, she'd taken photos of the tapes. Unfortunately for us, the pig repugs in Wisconsin got away with their "blatant poll count manipulations" in that recount, after they got away with their original felony election manipulations. And therefore WI got to keep Judge "Strangler" Prosser, who Waukesha's top election official had worked for previously.