Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

JCanete

(5,272 posts)

8. It does stifle dissent against the platform. That said, it is for the purpose of a message of

Reply to DanTex (Reply #5)

Wed Dec 7, 2016, 06:55 PM

Dec 2016

solidarity behind our nominated candidate, and I don't object to it. The point, more than anything is the need to clearly and easily screen trolls who's intentions are to bait discussion and suck energy away from better more productive topics.

Constructive criticism though, is not something to be terrified of and shouted down. I feel like we are or should be more capable of fielding serious issues without freaking the hell out about the possibility that broaching them is "giving comfort to the enemy!"

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Dredging the primary is the most important thing Dems can do right now. [View all] RadiationTherapy Dec 2016 OP

I agree they are unified in certain ways, and not so much in others. elleng Dec 2016 #1

Not likely ymetca Dec 2016 #2

The most important thing Dems can do now is sit down and figure out what we can win in 2017. Vinca Dec 2016 #3

Yes, of course. I suppose I think that in the meantime, some message refinement may be in order. RadiationTherapy Dec 2016 #11

The fact is they aren't worlds apart in terms of policy BainsBane Dec 2016 #4

Historically, by policy, you wouldn't be able to make the case you just did, that Clinton is JCanete Dec 2016 #7

I think they are worlds apart in terms of class war rhetoric. RadiationTherapy Dec 2016 #10

"Stifling dissent against the platform." LOL. DanTex Dec 2016 #5

It does stifle dissent against the platform. That said, it is for the purpose of a message of JCanete Dec 2016 #8

I also did not object to it; I was just pointing out that it happened and so RadiationTherapy Dec 2016 #9

Nobody got banned for constructive criticism. DanTex Dec 2016 #12

.... LexVegas Dec 2016 #18

But its difficult to really know why things went the way they did. There is only JCanete Dec 2016 #6

It is difficult, but DU has 100k+ users who all have unprecedented access RadiationTherapy Dec 2016 #16

Clinton and Sanders are part of history, not the future. geek tragedy Dec 2016 #13

Agreed. RadiationTherapy Dec 2016 #17

Oh for Gods sake ismnotwasm Dec 2016 #14

My op literally says that I think it is the most important thing for the dem party. RadiationTherapy Dec 2016 #15