Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MFM008

(20,001 posts)
27. How did I lnow
Sat Dec 10, 2016, 04:35 PM
Dec 2016

The DNC thing was gonna get mentioned?
because that's so much more important than this maggot getting into office and destroying the country and the world.

I listened to him say that as well. triron Dec 2016 #1
Doesn't matter what European democracies would do. Kotya Dec 2016 #6
Or the EC can do their ethical duty and refuse to approve him. n/t duffyduff Dec 2016 #9
Yes, they can. Kotya Dec 2016 #11
That is because the EC is made up of a bunch of stupid partisans. duffyduff Dec 2016 #13
Actually, that is exactly what I am counting on, the meteor that is still_one Dec 2016 #80
Why are you so determined he becomes president? libtodeath Dec 2016 #17
Don't confuse my understanding of how the Constitution works Kotya Dec 2016 #19
Have we ever been in this situation before with the constitution silent on what to do? libtodeath Dec 2016 #21
The Constitution is not silent on what to do. Kotya Dec 2016 #23
Glad you are happy to surrender libtodeath Dec 2016 #24
And now we see why treestar Dec 2016 #71
Surrendering the constitution by somehow having a do over is not an option. longship Dec 2016 #79
And yet it wasn't just DNC emails now was it? leftofcool Dec 2016 #26
What else was hacked, and how? Exilednight Dec 2016 #55
I just re-read the WP article and as far as I can tell, Kotya Dec 2016 #62
NYT says RNC hacked but nothing released yet Justice Dec 2016 #83
How did I lnow MFM008 Dec 2016 #27
Bernie Busters, Republicans, and Russia Charles Bukowski Dec 2016 #54
Exactly. That is coming through in the comments Justice Dec 2016 #82
No, we have not been in this situation before... awoke_in_2003 Dec 2016 #35
The original setup was people voted for people to vote for people.... Spitfire of ATJ Dec 2016 #31
Actually there was nothing in the original set up about people voting for the EC onenote Dec 2016 #72
You also originally had to be a wealthy land owner.... Spitfire of ATJ Dec 2016 #84
and not a slave. and male. onenote Dec 2016 #85
Yes there are. The president can impose martial law. Maraya1969 Dec 2016 #40
I think that needs to happen triron Dec 2016 #42
agreed; a foreign power is attempting to hijack our very democracy/government. nt TheFrenchRazor Dec 2016 #69
The SCOTUS has described a very limited set of circumstances where that could happen onenote Dec 2016 #73
Let's do it. democratisphere Dec 2016 #2
Indulge me, please. Kotya Dec 2016 #7
High level meetings bucolic_frolic Dec 2016 #30
Forget it. duffyduff Dec 2016 #10
Yes, to the person who won the most electoral votes. Kotya Dec 2016 #14
Nope. The person who got the popular vote should be in because those T states are under suspicion. duffyduff Dec 2016 #16
We do need a new vote, without trasonous interference from the Russian-Republican cabal Achilleaze Dec 2016 #3
BINGO !!! Its not a matter of HOW MUCH they interfered that's a false bar. Its a matter of IF uponit7771 Dec 2016 #4
This had the appearance of an election but as it turns out the fix was in. A fix is not an election. AnotherMother4Peace Dec 2016 #5
Perhaps we should redo the Democratic primary as well NobodyHere Dec 2016 #50
Ouch! Kotya Dec 2016 #56
Did this stupid ass response really cause you pain? nt AnotherMother4Peace Dec 2016 #63
We don't need a new vote. duffyduff Dec 2016 #8
States like California and New York could hold referendums on recognizing Trump's authority KittyWampus Dec 2016 #12
Yep. I don't think secession is beyond the realm of possibility. duffyduff Dec 2016 #15
There should be a petition to the scotus to put a moritorium on the EC vote. libtodeath Dec 2016 #18
Which would be rejected 8-0. n/t PoliticAverse Dec 2016 #33
You thik that really? libtodeath Dec 2016 #37
Absolutely. n/t PoliticAverse Dec 2016 #38
I hope you are wrong because if not hell on earth is on us. libtodeath Dec 2016 #39
Don't they teach the 'civil war' thing in schools anymore? n/t PoliticAverse Dec 2016 #51
Yes, they do. We won, the Industrialists bought up the South and over time KittyWampus Dec 2016 #86
Well it would be nice if the rest of the US didn't have to fight California and New York... PoliticAverse Dec 2016 #87
good idea; he is illegitimate. end of story. nt TheFrenchRazor Dec 2016 #70
I'm not sure that there is any kind of legal or constitutional mechanism for holding another totodeinhere Dec 2016 #20
If new elections are called Qutzupalotl Dec 2016 #22
I'd be okay with that... Farmgirl1961 Dec 2016 #52
At the very LEAST, this will send Orange Rectum over the edge. . . . BigDemVoter Dec 2016 #25
Just elect Hillary Jean-Jacques Roussea Dec 2016 #28
Yes, we should start the process that the constitution has for hughee99 Dec 2016 #29
Well Biden has hinted he might run in the "do-over". n/t PoliticAverse Dec 2016 #34
"As soon as possible" means Tuesday, November 3rd, 2020. Kotya Dec 2016 #57
Exactly. People are rightly concerned about trump, hughee99 Dec 2016 #59
Have a new election triron Dec 2016 #60
And? I don't think judicial rulings in foreign countries hughee99 Dec 2016 #61
Won't happen AlexSFCA Dec 2016 #32
If they oppose the infrastructure spending bill they could just not pass it. n/t PoliticAverse Dec 2016 #36
not that simple AlexSFCA Dec 2016 #47
If they don't have enough votes to stop the spending bill they aren't going to have enough votes... PoliticAverse Dec 2016 #48
The only way the House could elect Ryan as President onenote Dec 2016 #74
Post removed Post removed Dec 2016 #41
The "revolution" needs to be peaceful and realistic. (nt) ehrnst Dec 2016 #43
Other nations have done it. triron Dec 2016 #44
most recently Austria triron Dec 2016 #49
Other nations do lots of stuff. We follow our Constitution. onenote Dec 2016 #75
What if we can prove that the FBI interfered with the election? (eom) StevieM Dec 2016 #45
Between now and a week from Monday? onenote Dec 2016 #76
Okay let us make a deal, CIA release all dirty secrets and come clean. Rex Dec 2016 #46
Martial law? HoneyBadgerDontCare Dec 2016 #53
See post #73 onenote Dec 2016 #77
knr triron Dec 2016 #58
knr triron Dec 2016 #64
knr triron Dec 2016 #65
This election was won because of Doreen Dec 2016 #66
yep. Connect the dots. triron Dec 2016 #68
Good. ooky Dec 2016 #67
trump has more to fear zippythepinhead Dec 2016 #78
There will be no new vote dagnuguy Dec 2016 #81
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Ex-CIA operative: We may ...»Reply #27