Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: So, Hillary had Russian intelligence, the leader of the FBI, Trump/GOP, the Media, Bernie or Busters [View all]stevenleser
(32,886 posts)45. Words have meanings. If you are going to be offended by a characterization
Of a group of folks, the obvious question is whether you are in that group.
The only people who would consider that "lame" are folks with an agenda they don't want exposed.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
73 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So, Hillary had Russian intelligence, the leader of the FBI, Trump/GOP, the Media, Bernie or Busters [View all]
stevenleser
Dec 2016
OP
And what fomented the loss of Indys, X-Over Reps and Millennials? HRC selecting Kaine over Sanders
TheBlackAdder
Dec 2016
#22
Because they bought into the hate completely and salivated over Guccifer and spread this
bettyellen
Dec 2016
#28
And over at JPR they are still posting comments patting themselves on the back for just that
stevenleser
Dec 2016
#5
What if she also had Republican vote tamperers, and actually won the election, both ...
planetc
Dec 2016
#7
Gee,maybe you should be more worried about the Russian hack then digging up the primarys
libtodeath
Dec 2016
#8
Maybe I can walk and chew gum at the same time. But thanks for your concern. Oh and BTW
stevenleser
Dec 2016
#10
Or more likely you can't handle the points being raised so you are going ad-hominem?
stevenleser
Dec 2016
#13
Nice try to smear me but your posts show exactly who you are and beholden to.
libtodeath
Dec 2016
#16
Nope, everything you accused me of you also accused Bernie of, but you havent figured that out yet.
stevenleser
Dec 2016
#15
Appearing for an interview is the same as promoting a anti american network.
libtodeath
Dec 2016
#18
And if you believe that, then Bernie did the same thing. I realize you can't respond but
stevenleser
Dec 2016
#19
No she wasn't. The nation is sick of political dynasties. Jeb Bush lost for the same reason. nt
Gore1FL
Dec 2016
#24
Nope, not hate, empirical analysis. You should work on understanding what that means. nt
stevenleser
Dec 2016
#48
It means those who did not vote for Gore, Obama or Hillary and believe that was the right choice. nt
stevenleser
Dec 2016
#57
Comey, voter suppression And Russia... Empirical factors everything else is guessing
uponit7771
Dec 2016
#30
Did she light her hair on fire and blow up Isis? No?!?! Well there it is then
uponit7771
Dec 2016
#29
Hillary was probably the most qualified person ever for the job. But I voted Bernie in the primary.
Glassunion
Dec 2016
#32
I already rebuffed them. Nothing you wrote addresses my points. It was just silly. Nt
stevenleser
Dec 2016
#72
That's right. I am just THAT effing powerful. Nevermind the propaganda media machine
AgadorSparticus
Dec 2016
#65
Nope, you're not. But as in any Democracy, group enough folks together and they can influence
stevenleser
Dec 2016
#66
Not to mention the Shelby County v. Holder decision, and 25+ years of vicious slander.
Garrett78
Dec 2016
#67