2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: How we regarded election fraud and systemic bias in the primary [View all]Bernardo de La Paz
(50,955 posts)If a judge convicts a violent criminal of spouse abuse and then later they get out and kill the judge, then your logic would say "the judge brought it on her/himself".
When person A does something to anger B who then retaliates against A does not mean that A "brought it on themselves".
It doesn't matter if A and B are business people where A blocks a merger & acquisition by B.
It doesn't matter if A is Hillary and B is Putin.
It doesn't matter if A and B are posters on DU where an angry B cyber-bullies A in retaliation.
Posters like Jalan and other DU posters are perfectly within bounds to assert that A bothered B and then B retaliated. When they do so, they can't be accused of "insinuating" that A brought B's illegal or unethical actions down on themselves.