Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Another thing I don't get is progressives who love Tulsi Gabbard but rail against blue dogs [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)33. Do you like what she's SAYING about Syria?????
Democratic Rep. Tulsi Gabbard Goes to Trump Tower to Defend Assad
Tulsi Gabbard, a favorite of both progressives and Trump senior counselor Steve Bannon, met with the president-elect Monday to make a plea: Leave Syrias dictator alone.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/11/21/democratic-rep-tulsi-gabbard-goes-to-trump-tower-to-defend-assad.html
She does not share my values.
Tulsi Gabbard, a favorite of both progressives and Trump senior counselor Steve Bannon, met with the president-elect Monday to make a plea: Leave Syrias dictator alone.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/11/21/democratic-rep-tulsi-gabbard-goes-to-trump-tower-to-defend-assad.html
....the Hawaii congresswoman has also been a defender of Syrian dictator Bashar al-Assad and Russias Vladimir Putinstances that align with the incoming administrations foreign policy.
Gabbard, a favorite of incoming White House senior counselor Steve Bannon, is the first congressional Democrat approached to have a face-to-face meeting with Trumpand the first Bernie Sanders supporter to do so as well. Sensing criticism from the left for taking a meeting with Trump, she put out a statement in which she justified her foreign policy meeting as necessary so that the left and right could find common ground.
But she also included pro-Assad apologia in the mix, arguing that the United States should not confront Russia because it could lead to conflict and indicating that the Assad regime should remain in place, calling any attempts to remove him as illegal.
....I shared with him my grave concerns that escalating the war in Syria by implementing a so-called no fly/safe zone would be disastrous for the Syrian people, our country, and the world, Gabbard said. It would lead to more death and suffering, exacerbate the refugee crisis, strengthen ISIS and al Qaeda, and bring us into a direct conflict with Russia which could result in a nuclear war.
That might sound like standard issue progressive anti-war rhetoric, but coupled with her past statements and actions, its more of a plea to let Assad be. In March, for instance, Gabbard was the only Democrat and one of just three members of Congress to vote against a resolution condemning violence by the Assad regime against civilian populations.
And she has long been a defender of the Putin regime, writing for example in September 2015, on the first day of the Russian intervention in Syria, Its mind-boggling that we protest Russias bombing of these terrorists. Russia is responsible for attacking U.S.-backed opposition forces in Syria, an aid convoy delivering relief to civilians, and medical facilities.
By taking the meeting with Trump and making such a statement afterward, critics argue, Gabbard is giving the Trump administration the guise of bipartisan support for ignoring Assads war crimes, which include bombing civilian populations and the use of chemical weapons. Gabbard and Trump also see eye to eye on closing the door on refugees....
She does not share my values.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
96 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Another thing I don't get is progressives who love Tulsi Gabbard but rail against blue dogs [View all]
La Lioness Priyanka
Dec 2016
OP
I try not to expect consistent beliefs of anyone at either extreme of the political spectrum.
LonePirate
Dec 2016
#2
actually most liberals in india do. i know this because i am from india and have a large set of
La Lioness Priyanka
Dec 2016
#52
Not to pick nits, i think that classifies as more of a slaughter or massacre than a genocide
dionysus
Dec 2016
#81
there is still hope gabbard will take a job with the trump admin so we can get a real progressive nt
msongs
Dec 2016
#5
oh god. that's not a real thing is it? i heard that it maybe true for heidi heitcamp
La Lioness Priyanka
Dec 2016
#6
In the case of Tulsi, it comes down to she endorsed Sanders. Nothing else matters, not her record
KittyWampus
Dec 2016
#16
You're not going back far enough. Stop quoting the recent stuff, when her profile was raised.
MADem
Dec 2016
#45
Her father is a Roman Catholic. She learned a lot of her hate at her daddy's knee.
MADem
Dec 2016
#64
I simply pointed out her father's religion as a counterpoint to your assumption that I felt
MADem
Dec 2016
#66
I don't know why she thinks as she does. She is a Muslim - hater, though. Her comments
MADem
Dec 2016
#84
yeah, the love of Tulsi is unwarranted. if that's the best the dems can do from her district
La Lioness Priyanka
Dec 2016
#68
No one with a brain thinks that pipeline is a smart idea. Doesn't make them "liberal."
MADem
Dec 2016
#78
Only about a dozen in Congress signed that letter of protest to President Obama
oberliner
Dec 2016
#79
She "modified" those public positions because her attitudes weren't selling in her district.
MADem
Dec 2016
#85
Probably not - but I do appreciate you taking the time to engage in this conversation
oberliner
Dec 2016
#94
Is there supposed to be a difference, now? In the past, people used the term progressive
dionysus
Dec 2016
#82
GIRL! I got a hide a week back cause I pointed out Tulsi loves guns and hates Muslims...
KittyWampus
Dec 2016
#14
First we need to recognized she endorsed Sanders. After that, many other things make sense.
KittyWampus
Dec 2016
#17
I seem to remember a young man named Barack Obama who did pretty well for himself
La Lioness Priyanka
Dec 2016
#47
probably that as the field goes our choices suck? Its better to choose candidates that are at least
JCanete
Dec 2016
#26
She's a favorite of Bannon's for God's sake. Why would we even entertain trusting . . .
brush
Dec 2016
#42
I think you didn't read my post, where i clearly said, if thats the best we can do in that district
La Lioness Priyanka
Dec 2016
#46
Missed it. totally with you on that then. Are there those who are doing that, or just those
JCanete
Dec 2016
#48
the chair should only remain ONLY as long as it's mathematically possible for someone to win
La Lioness Priyanka
Dec 2016
#55
i am saying that had she been a clinton supporter your words would be far harsher toward Tulsi
La Lioness Priyanka
Dec 2016
#62
yes, and I am not saying you have to vilify her. it's your attitude towards Cuomo
La Lioness Priyanka
Dec 2016
#67
there was no reason for that allegation, not a shred of proof, not a single thing.
La Lioness Priyanka
Dec 2016
#73