Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Joe941

(2,848 posts)
128. I disagree with your logic...
Thu Dec 22, 2016, 05:11 PM
Dec 2016

The super delegates had a suppression effect on Bernie voters because it was perceived Bernie was so far behind so it was a waste to go vote for him.

I am willing to entertain the notion that both of them would have been weak candidates in the RDANGELO Dec 2016 #1
I can get with that idea bravenak Dec 2016 #3
Nobody trusted her but 66 some million voters, nearly 3 million more than Trump brush Dec 2016 #53
+1. n/t pnwmom Dec 2016 #136
all candidates are flawed - the party that nominates the more charismatic candidate wins. NewJeffCT Dec 2016 #60
Don't forget JFK & Nixon. The polls suggested that those who "listened" to the first jonno99 Dec 2016 #155
Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2016 #2
And long term reliable members rejected him bravenak Dec 2016 #5
Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2016 #7
I am a millennial and I am a longterm reliable voter bravenak Dec 2016 #11
Speak on it!!!!!! Tarheel_Dem Dec 2016 #23
Boy, these people, lol bravenak Dec 2016 #29
scream it. mopinko Dec 2016 #51
Brava! sheshe2 Dec 2016 #103
This post is so profound. liquid diamond Dec 2016 #204
I agree; it's unfair of them to expect treestar Dec 2016 #32
Yes!!! bravenak Dec 2016 #36
Conversely... Else You Are Mad Dec 2016 #4
It was more popular than Bernies and slightly less popular than Obama's bravenak Dec 2016 #6
We do not know that. Else You Are Mad Dec 2016 #8
They have no problem with Trump's Goldman Sachs cabinet so why would they vote Bernie? bravenak Dec 2016 #12
Except none of those "populist" DT voters care that he's putting all these Goldman Sachs pnwmom Dec 2016 #142
According to this, Sanders would have crushed Trump mtnsnake Dec 2016 #9
Us uncut is fake new imo bravenak Dec 2016 #13
What is fake about that analsyis? mtnsnake Dec 2016 #19
They have been reporting bullshit for months. I won't read them anymore. bravenak Dec 2016 #20
I'll take your word for it, bravenak mtnsnake Dec 2016 #44
I think nobody would have beaten Trump except Obama bravenak Dec 2016 #47
I think it will be easy to beat Trump in 2020 if the asshole is still in office mtnsnake Dec 2016 #56
I want Corey Booker to run, I really like his personality bravenak Dec 2016 #58
I never thought of them as a team even though they both top my list mtnsnake Dec 2016 #62
Either way they work it I will work my ass off bravenak Dec 2016 #66
I like them both mcar Dec 2016 #69
Love her bravenak Dec 2016 #79
Good for you bravenak. sheshe2 Dec 2016 #105
Her opponent was a shithead bravenak Dec 2016 #107
Yup... sheshe2 Dec 2016 #113
US Uncut is not fake news. Mr. Evil Dec 2016 #163
I said imo. In my opinion bravenak Dec 2016 #164
At best it is a liberal site that reports with a bias and often omits facts etherealtruth Dec 2016 #197
Fake news... revmclaren Dec 2016 #17
What exactly is fake about that article? mtnsnake Dec 2016 #21
I could say prove to me its true revmclaren Dec 2016 #25
Just as I thought. You couldn't come up with anything. mtnsnake Dec 2016 #34
dont have to prove anything to someone revmclaren Dec 2016 #95
same here mtnsnake Dec 2016 #102
USuncut? Really? Come on snake. Tarheel_Dem Dec 2016 #28
Sorry, I thought the article made sense, but I didn't know they were fake news mtnsnake Dec 2016 #48
There's no way to know that. TheCowsCameHome Dec 2016 #10
When people stop lying and saying Sanders would hav crushed it bravenak Dec 2016 #14
How is it a lie? TheCowsCameHome Dec 2016 #73
Because Sanders had not enough appeal to the democratic base bravenak Dec 2016 #76
The EC is the system that is in place. TheCowsCameHome Dec 2016 #84
I never said she was going to be. Have fun beating yr strawmen bravenak Dec 2016 #85
You, too - your dead horse. TheCowsCameHome Dec 2016 #88
an op is not a response. How the fuck can you tell at this point who the originator and who the JCanete Dec 2016 #186
Chill bravenak Dec 2016 #188
Bernie would have won. The DNC slowed his momentum by delaying the debates. virtualobserver Dec 2016 #15
Bullshit. He lost the debates bravenak Dec 2016 #16
His poll numbers steadily rose. virtualobserver Dec 2016 #18
Poll! Yay! Because polls were SPOT ON! Lol bravenak Dec 2016 #22
the polls are not perfect, but I'd rather go with the candidate with the double digit lead..... virtualobserver Dec 2016 #27
Sanders not vetted and was treated with kid gloves in the primaries Gothmog Dec 2016 #35
Sanders would have handled it. He would have made Trump look like a fool. virtualobserver Dec 2016 #41
Trump had a ton of good oppo on Sanders that would have killed him Gothmog Dec 2016 #123
nonsense virtualobserver Dec 2016 #140
THIS we can do it Dec 2016 #195
These polls were totally meaningless in the real world Gothmog Dec 2016 #30
Going with your candidate brought us Trump...that isn't hypothetical. virtualobserver Dec 2016 #37
And so was the man Clinton beat. bravenak Dec 2016 #43
In some states he did appeal to black voters. virtualobserver Dec 2016 #52
Ignoring the actual voters is how you lose bravenak Dec 2016 #54
A Hillary nomination brought us Trump. virtualobserver Dec 2016 #64
No. The electoral college brought us Trump bravenak Dec 2016 #67
Any intelligent campaign knows that it has to win the electoral vote virtualobserver Dec 2016 #72
And any intelligent campaign knows it must win a primary first to even think about a general bravenak Dec 2016 #78
the DNC delayed the debates to keep people from gaining momentum virtualobserver Dec 2016 #89
He could never win without the south. The black vote. How was he going to get that? bravenak Dec 2016 #91
He didn't have to win the south. He just had to do better in the south, and everywhere else. virtualobserver Dec 2016 #98
To win the primary he needed some of those southern states bravenak Dec 2016 #99
he didn't lose NH, and momentum is everything virtualobserver Dec 2016 #110
You think that we would have just voted for him because he got momentum from NH? bravenak Dec 2016 #117
It isn't about "following"...momentum makes the case for viability. virtualobserver Dec 2016 #133
Why. Would we have switched just because he won the two whitest states? bravenak Dec 2016 #135
you speak of this monolithic "we".... virtualobserver Dec 2016 #143
Not enough bravenak Dec 2016 #144
I disagree virtualobserver Dec 2016 #147
Where is your evidence that enough of us would have switched to the guy who called our bravenak Dec 2016 #149
where is your evidence that people wouldn't have? virtualobserver Dec 2016 #153
Impossible to prove a negative. Illogical too. bravenak Dec 2016 #156
The point is that neither of our positions can be proven to be correct virtualobserver Dec 2016 #160
Very true bravenak Dec 2016 #162
and we both have to live with Trump. virtualobserver Dec 2016 #165
I will be crying bravenak Dec 2016 #166
I agree..... virtualobserver Dec 2016 #169
No shit. He really fucked shit up. It's like handing it off to a mean ass six year old. bravenak Dec 2016 #173
Iowa and New Hampshire are two 90%+ white states Gothmog Dec 2016 #122
Where did HRC win in the South Lonusca Dec 2016 #200
Doesn't make sense treestar Dec 2016 #39
Bernie would have won independents. virtualobserver Dec 2016 #45
No surmise the Democratic party did not treestar Dec 2016 #46
I wasn't counting on anything. virtualobserver Dec 2016 #55
I don't even know what that means treestar Dec 2016 #61
He was completely unvetted mcar Dec 2016 #71
next to the reality of Trump....any "huge file" would have had no impact. virtualobserver Dec 2016 #75
That makes no sense mcar Dec 2016 #80
your "huge file" on Bernie is in your imagination virtualobserver Dec 2016 #93
Wrong mcar Dec 2016 #157
Most of Sanders so-called victories were in caucus states Gothmog Dec 2016 #24
I agree bravenak Dec 2016 #31
Michigan was also an open primary NewJeffCT Dec 2016 #63
There was no doubt some cross over by GOP types to mess up the nomination process Gothmog Dec 2016 #118
I agree bravenak Dec 2016 #177
I bet to differ... Joe941 Dec 2016 #26
She still did not need them to be way way way past him in delegate totals so.... bravenak Dec 2016 #33
Super delegates would have supported Bernie if he had been leading in pledged delegates tammywammy Dec 2016 #38
You are using facts against a silly talking point that has no basis in reality Gothmog Dec 2016 #116
Super delegates did not come into play because sanders only got 43% of primary popular vote Gothmog Dec 2016 #40
The point is when the news... Joe941 Dec 2016 #42
That did not happen in the real world Gothmog Dec 2016 #115
I disagree with your logic... Joe941 Dec 2016 #128
I was a delegate to the national convention Gothmog Dec 2016 #139
Fans of Obama and Edwards also said that 2008 was rigged NewJeffCT Dec 2016 #65
as our new President often says "WRONG" bowens43 Dec 2016 #49
He's not my fucking President bravenak Dec 2016 #50
quoting trump revmclaren Dec 2016 #109
Yup, he would have easily won Arazi Dec 2016 #57
Without minority voters feeling enthused? Yeah right bravenak Dec 2016 #59
That didn't really work out for Hillary either. progressoid Dec 2016 #70
And less than with any candidate besides obama. Remember that bravenak Dec 2016 #81
And the Latino vote? progressoid Dec 2016 #94
She got the majority of it. Check the numbers bravenak Dec 2016 #97
But it was still a drop from 4 years ago. progressoid Dec 2016 #108
They only voted so high for dems because of obama. The way people act now bravenak Dec 2016 #119
He would not have won mcar Dec 2016 #68
You are so right bravenak Dec 2016 #83
And yet it's claimed over and over here mcar Dec 2016 #87
I am super bored with it bravenak Dec 2016 #92
Me too mcar Dec 2016 #158
This wasn't about platforms. iscooterliberally Dec 2016 #74
Do whatever you need to deflect attention from your loss. TheCowsCameHome Dec 2016 #77
My loss? Did you somehow win while the rest of us lost bigly? bravenak Dec 2016 #82
You don't seem to be able to accept it. TheCowsCameHome Dec 2016 #86
More strawmen to abuse. I never said any of that or wished anything here bravenak Dec 2016 #90
My anger has passed. TheCowsCameHome Dec 2016 #130
You a mind reader too? bravenak Dec 2016 #131
People don't generally comment about this, but... Mike Nelson Dec 2016 #96
Absolutely bravenak Dec 2016 #101
Hillary had astronomical unfavorable ratings for a Presidential candidate. Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2016 #100
When are you going to layoff Bernie Sanders, bravenak? Chasstev365 Dec 2016 #104
Ask huffpo bravenak Dec 2016 #106
He would have won handily. Deal with it. Schema Thing Dec 2016 #111
I have accepted he would have lost. You should accept that he did. Handily. bravenak Dec 2016 #114
Excellent article, bravenak. sheshe2 Dec 2016 #112
Thank you bravenak Dec 2016 #120
Backatcha. sheshe2 Dec 2016 #121
I think he could've oberliner Dec 2016 #124
He would have gone full blown stormfront on Bernie bravenak Dec 2016 #125
Yes, it would have been ugly oberliner Dec 2016 #127
Sanders was on the ballot and underpreformed Clinton Gothmog Dec 2016 #126
We would have lost forty states bravenak Dec 2016 #134
I agree Gothmog Dec 2016 #203
Bravenak you are dead wrong TaterBake Dec 2016 #129
Polls, yay!! They were so perfect!! Lol bravenak Dec 2016 #132
They showed her within margin of error with tRump, which is where she ended up. They showed JudyM Dec 2016 #167
Those polls were done in Nov showing Bernie ten points ahead? bravenak Dec 2016 #171
Ha! Doesn't matter, they were 10points beyond the MOE, consistently. That many more likely JudyM Dec 2016 #175
Polls from what, April? Not valid bravenak Dec 2016 #178
If you say so it must be right. JudyM Dec 2016 #182
Half corporate party? ismnotwasm Dec 2016 #187
Why the hell do liquid diamond Dec 2016 #205
People throwing around absolutes really need to stop. We will never know. Get over it NWCorona Dec 2016 #137
I really don't think either of them would have won bravenak Dec 2016 #138
The underlying and hidden metrics were always in Trump's favor NWCorona Dec 2016 #159
I agree bravenak Dec 2016 #161
I would never say he gave up but he did move resources else where but by that point NWCorona Dec 2016 #172
Exactly. You got that right bravenak Dec 2016 #174
whup it out! Cryptoad Dec 2016 #141
I know bravenak Dec 2016 #145
I just wonder how Bernie would have responded when Comey opened an investigation of his ties world wide wally Dec 2016 #146
He would have said the DNC rigged the FBI bravenak Dec 2016 #148
This thread brought to you by the people who said Clinton would win in a landslide. nt Gore1FL Dec 2016 #150
I was not the writer of those ops bravenak Dec 2016 #151
Did you not think she was going to win, or just not in a landslide? nt Gore1FL Dec 2016 #152
I thought she would until Comey bravenak Dec 2016 #154
I had my concerns all the way through due to the voter rejection of political dynasties. Gore1FL Dec 2016 #168
All of this is speculation. We need new blood bravenak Dec 2016 #170
Of course it is all speculation. Hence my criticism of your OP. Gore1FL Dec 2016 #193
Sanders' message was clearly rejected. The 70,000-something people spread over R B Garr Dec 2016 #180
If you say so. I don't recall him runnning in the general election to know if he was rejected. Gore1FL Dec 2016 #192
The 70,000-something voters who decided this election voted R B Garr Dec 2016 #194
Those 70,000-something didn't vote for a lot of people where were not running besides Sanders. Gore1FL Dec 2016 #198
I believe that Bernie would have won. But, the election is over and Trump won. DemocraticWing Dec 2016 #176
Good on you bravenak Dec 2016 #179
Agreed, brave! I guess it bears repeating until the fantasyland relating to him R B Garr Dec 2016 #181
Right? The manson/trump side by side tells the tale bravenak Dec 2016 #184
Anyone who definitively claims to know whether Bernie would have lost or won has little credibility. aikoaiko Dec 2016 #183
Nobody knows for sure bravenak Dec 2016 #185
We did do that. forjusticethunders Dec 2016 #196
I dont think so. Given her history there was no shifting to economic issues aikoaiko Dec 2016 #202
Hillary headed a ticket that did poorly quaker bill Dec 2016 #189
I must respectfully disagree... gregcrawford Dec 2016 #190
Yes. Bernie Sander would have beaten Trump Devil Child Dec 2016 #191
You're wrong. PA, MI and WI... SMC22307 Dec 2016 #199
We don't get to know that. Orsino Dec 2016 #201
Truth! And, Marcus lays it out with FACTS.. So glad I saw this!! Cha Dec 2016 #206
Nope your wrong. Bernie would have beaten Trump jack_krass Dec 2016 #207
Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»No. Bernie Sanders would ...»Reply #128