Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Who we should or shouldn't have nominated NO LONGER MATTERS. [View all]Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)9. No I'm not.
I haven't been arguing that we should have had a different nominee.
All I did was to argue that we should have made a few changes in strategy, use of the candidate's time and what should have been in the ads and the stump speech. Nothing I said in those post-convention posts did any harm.
I don't have to repudiate the person I supported in the spring to prove I want unity now.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The lost art of coalition-building- it means work together on what you agree upon - and
Kashkakat v.2.0
Jan 2017
#5
I don't accept the premise that Sanders being on the ticket would have helped.
Garrett78
Jan 2017
#22
More than anything, people need to realize that voting AGAINST something awful...
NoGoodNamesLeft
Jan 2017
#18
The whole point of this thread is that our conversation shouldn't be about who we nominated at all.
Ken Burch
Jan 2017
#35
AMEN! Fighting for best spot on the beach ignoring the January 20th tsunami.
IADEMO2004
Jan 2017
#29