Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
In reply to the discussion: Who we should or shouldn't have nominated NO LONGER MATTERS. [View all]Ken Burch
(50,254 posts)39. And neither he nor Hillary is going to run for president again.
So we need to be past attacking either of them-or to be implying that the supporters of either of those people are responsible for what others found lacking in them(obviously there was no difference between Clinton supporters or Sanders supporters in terms of commitment to fighting social oppression-if you are on the left side of the spectrum, you are going to be committed to fighting bigotry).
No one in this party should still be arguing about who should or shouldn't have been nominated, OR repeating primary talking points against one or the other candidate.
What matters is unity for the present and future.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
41 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The lost art of coalition-building- it means work together on what you agree upon - and
Kashkakat v.2.0
Jan 2017
#5
I don't accept the premise that Sanders being on the ticket would have helped.
Garrett78
Jan 2017
#22
More than anything, people need to realize that voting AGAINST something awful...
NoGoodNamesLeft
Jan 2017
#18
The whole point of this thread is that our conversation shouldn't be about who we nominated at all.
Ken Burch
Jan 2017
#35
AMEN! Fighting for best spot on the beach ignoring the January 20th tsunami.
IADEMO2004
Jan 2017
#29