2016 Postmortem

LiberalLovinLug

(14,428 posts)

45. So what?

Thu Oct 22, 2015, 09:50 PM

Oct 2015

And as she says when confronted with this question,

http://www.bostonherald.com/news_opinion/us_politics/2012/01/elizabeth_warren_out_raises_scott_brown_defends

“There are people on Wall Street who actually believe we need better rules, fairer rules,” Warren said last night as she toured small businesses in Davis Square in Somerville.

“That’s what I stand for. I’ve gone toe-to-toe with these financial institutions. A lot of people understand if you don’t have tough rules and a tough cop on the beat, the whole system is going to come down around us.”

There are actual very wealthy individuals, like Warren Buffett for instance, that agree with Elizabeth Warren. Why should she give money back to those individuals that AGREE with her? I doubt if CityGroup or Goldman Sachs are on that list.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

51 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Warren Tells 2016 Dems To Cut Wall Street Ties [View all] JRLeft Oct 2015 OP

Ok. n/t zappaman Oct 2015 #1

Great answer. Well reasoned. Obviously deeply considered. Ed Suspicious Oct 2015 #2

Sure. n/t zappaman Oct 2015 #4

Word. n/t Ed Suspicious Oct 2015 #5

Yep. n/t zappaman Oct 2015 #14

Lol! Deep too! sabrina 1 Oct 2015 #10

That is pretty deep artislife Oct 2015 #21

In fairness, what other response can they give? arcane1 Oct 2015 #25

Give it another month artislife Oct 2015 #26

lol! as sheldon cooper once said restorefreedom Oct 2015 #42

As Warren has also benefitted from Wall Street, do you think she will continue to do their bidding? Thinkingabout Oct 2015 #3

Think about it. Warren makes no bones about who is the Ed Suspicious Oct 2015 #7

I happen to like Warren, Clinton has also made her thoughts on Wall Street, Since I am not Thinkingabout Oct 2015 #18

It is too bad you are not comparing. artislife Oct 2015 #27

I do not have any reason to compare Clinton and Warren, the comparing statements was not started Thinkingabout Oct 2015 #28

Okay. artislife Oct 2015 #29

Business as Usual means Admiral Loinpresser Oct 2015 #43

It does but they don't care artislife Oct 2015 #44

I don't think they will. Admiral Loinpresser Oct 2015 #51

How has Warren benefited from Wall Street? Luminous Animal Oct 2015 #23

Yes, she got campaign contributions from Wall Street. Thinkingabout Oct 2015 #31

Good luck trying to sell that one. Luminous Animal Oct 2015 #36

She said it herself, go tell Warren she is wrong, I dont have to sell it. Thinkingabout Oct 2015 #37

What was it that she actually said? Your attempts to drag Sen Warren down are rhett o rick Oct 2015 #40

Provide the proof that Warren said it herself Art_from_Ark Oct 2015 #47

Oh yes of course LiberalLovinLug Oct 2015 #30

Maybe a return for their contributions to her campaign. Thinkingabout Oct 2015 #32

? LiberalLovinLug Oct 2015 #38

She spent the money from the contributions for her campaign. Thinkingabout Oct 2015 #39

What's your point? Because she accepted campaign contributions from Wall Street, she's rhett o rick Oct 2015 #41

So what? LiberalLovinLug Oct 2015 #45

This message needs to be hand delivered to Hillary. Broward Oct 2015 #6

It would not make a difference. It's up to the people. Wall St and its surrogates are not interested sabrina 1 Oct 2015 #11

Huge +1! Enthusiast Oct 2015 #49

Which h and on which day? nt artislife Oct 2015 #22

K N R Faux pas Oct 2015 #8

HUGE K & R !!! - THANK YOU !!! WillyT Oct 2015 #9

This happened three months ago... brooklynite Oct 2015 #12

Exactly. arcane1 Oct 2015 #16

Which totally invalidates it, right? senz Oct 2015 #33

If only. Baitball Blogger Oct 2015 #13

Words, ethics, decency, and morality mean nothing to neoliberals. The two ways Zorra Oct 2015 #15

YES!!!!!!! OMG, thank you Sen Warren!!! nt 99th_Monkey Oct 2015 #17

Put the Wall Street Bankers in jail MrMickeysMom Oct 2015 #19

I'm sure Hillary will take that into consideration Fearless Oct 2015 #20

She is right. All Dem candidates should dump all ties. glinda Oct 2015 #24

Yes. Perhaps people could get it circulating around social media? senz Oct 2015 #34

I'm Not Optimistic About This Happening colsohlibgal Oct 2015 #35

K and R (nt) bigwillq Oct 2015 #46

I think she's halfway there Babel_17 Oct 2015 #48

Kicked and recommended! Enthusiast Oct 2015 #50