Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control Reform Activism
In reply to the discussion: Registration of all handguns. [View all]ellisonz
(27,743 posts)44. I've blocked this poster.
Last edited Sun Mar 24, 2013, 09:03 PM - Edit history (1)
I'll say this in response to his now deleted posts, if we can rationalize a $100 a year tax for not having health insurance we ought to be able to rationalize a $100 a year tax for owning firearms.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I disagree with your characterization of '1%' or 'loonies' being paranoid about this issue.
AtheistCrusader
Mar 2013
#3
One thing to keep in mind is that gun owners fear paying expensive fees each year with registration
NutmegYankee
Mar 2013
#13
So? Get rid of them. If you have a dog, you have to purchase a liscence for EACH ONE
graham4anything
Mar 2013
#14
So? So what. The entire issue needs to be reframed. And a new SCOTUS to reinterpret.
graham4anything
Mar 2013
#16
I bought a new car two weeks ago and - guess what! - the state is now requiring me to register and
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#19
No, it's not a false analogy. I purchased an item the state has determined needs to be kept track of
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#21
okay - so you agree that it's not the norm and that for the most part people don't do this?
ellisonz
Mar 2013
#25
Yes, you did move the goalposts and followed the so-moving up with more meaningless jazz:
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#31
Except, it's not a "thought": it's been proven. The reason you chose not to reply to #31
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#36
By-the-bye, for those keeping count: "But I will finish with this response," Nutmeg Yankee, #32.
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#40
He saw the best bet in this lop-sided "debate" he was losing was to self-delete and Run! Run! Run!
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#43
No, it's not. This is 2013, not 1913. Post links, please, proving the following assertions:
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#42