Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Populist Reform of the Democratic Party
Showing Original Post only (View all)The New Populist Movement: Organizing to Take Back America. [View all]
The New Populist Movement: Organizing to Take Back America.
Mar 2014
The new progressive populist movement is rising up in the United States. Inspired by an expansive vision of greater economic opportunity for all Americans, this new movement is also fueled by anger over politicians' broken promises. After decades of recurring economic crisis, which now seems systemic and permanent, millions of Americans have come to realize that much of our democratic system is now owned by a moneyed elite that use their power to resist real change and to manipulate the economy for their own financial gain.
Even the mass media know something big is going on. At the end of November, a Washington Post headline announced, "More liberal, populist movement emerging ahead of 2016 elections." And the New York Times, in a September article, reporting on the new progressive insurgency, cited the excitement generated by Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren and the new populist mayor of New York, Bill de Blasio. These and other media reports have been based on important new populist victories that represent the visible tip of a very large iceberg:
Low-wage workers and their allies have filled the streets of America's major cities, demanding a living wage and the right to bargain for wages and benefits. Their basic demand, echoed now by political leaders, is that full-time work should pay enough to keep a family out of poverty.
The cry of "break up the big banks" is now heard from protests at bank shareholder meetings to the halls of Congress. Many of the groups who worked to pass the Dodd-Frank bill have joined with housing advocates and others to demand Wall Street prosecutions - and real bank reform championed by Ohio Sen. Sherrod Brown and Sen. Warren.
Lawrence Summers, President Obama's top choice for Chair of the Federal Reserve, was stopped from getting that important job by a coalition of civic activists, including women and financial reform groups. Their favorite, Janet Yellen, was appointed instead.
The national debate on the future or Social Security has been flipped - from "Stop cutting benefits" to "Expand Social Security." Activists got Iowa Sen. Tom Harkin to introduce a bill with Sen. Sherrod Brown to expand benefits. Sen. Warren helped achieve critical mass. Conservative "Third Way" operatives attacked, but actual Third Way Members of Congress denounced their own group - and several actually embraced Social Security expansion. And after grassroots pressure, President Obama withdrew his plan to cut Social Security benefits...
Political reporters have tended to frame the New Populism as either a challenge to President Obama - or as an agenda and constituency for whoever might run against Hillary Clinton. But hard experience has taught us we need to build an independent force that can fight the big corporate interests and shape a positive agenda for all politicians who claim be for progressive change.
To be clear, this new movement is still coming together, most visible politically in the grassroots campaigns to raise the minimum wage and extend unemployment insurance.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/roger-hickey/the-new-populist-movement_b_4899347.html
Mar 2014
The new progressive populist movement is rising up in the United States. Inspired by an expansive vision of greater economic opportunity for all Americans, this new movement is also fueled by anger over politicians' broken promises. After decades of recurring economic crisis, which now seems systemic and permanent, millions of Americans have come to realize that much of our democratic system is now owned by a moneyed elite that use their power to resist real change and to manipulate the economy for their own financial gain.
Even the mass media know something big is going on. At the end of November, a Washington Post headline announced, "More liberal, populist movement emerging ahead of 2016 elections." And the New York Times, in a September article, reporting on the new progressive insurgency, cited the excitement generated by Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren and the new populist mayor of New York, Bill de Blasio. These and other media reports have been based on important new populist victories that represent the visible tip of a very large iceberg:
Low-wage workers and their allies have filled the streets of America's major cities, demanding a living wage and the right to bargain for wages and benefits. Their basic demand, echoed now by political leaders, is that full-time work should pay enough to keep a family out of poverty.
The cry of "break up the big banks" is now heard from protests at bank shareholder meetings to the halls of Congress. Many of the groups who worked to pass the Dodd-Frank bill have joined with housing advocates and others to demand Wall Street prosecutions - and real bank reform championed by Ohio Sen. Sherrod Brown and Sen. Warren.
Lawrence Summers, President Obama's top choice for Chair of the Federal Reserve, was stopped from getting that important job by a coalition of civic activists, including women and financial reform groups. Their favorite, Janet Yellen, was appointed instead.
The national debate on the future or Social Security has been flipped - from "Stop cutting benefits" to "Expand Social Security." Activists got Iowa Sen. Tom Harkin to introduce a bill with Sen. Sherrod Brown to expand benefits. Sen. Warren helped achieve critical mass. Conservative "Third Way" operatives attacked, but actual Third Way Members of Congress denounced their own group - and several actually embraced Social Security expansion. And after grassroots pressure, President Obama withdrew his plan to cut Social Security benefits...
Political reporters have tended to frame the New Populism as either a challenge to President Obama - or as an agenda and constituency for whoever might run against Hillary Clinton. But hard experience has taught us we need to build an independent force that can fight the big corporate interests and shape a positive agenda for all politicians who claim be for progressive change.
To be clear, this new movement is still coming together, most visible politically in the grassroots campaigns to raise the minimum wage and extend unemployment insurance.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/roger-hickey/the-new-populist-movement_b_4899347.html
Very good article. It goes on to list the 12 big elements of the emerging New Populist agenda:
1. Revive Sustainable Economic Growth, Creating Jobs for All.
2. Invest in America's Infrastructure and in New Jobs for the 21st Century.
3. Make Work Pay - and Fight to Reduce Inequality in America.
4. If the Rising American Electorate Succeeds, America Succeeds.
5. Guarantee Access to High Quality Public Education for All.
6. Strengthen and Expand Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid.
7. Make the Rich and Corporations Pay Their Fair Share.
8. Stop Bad Trade Deals, and Balance Trade Based on Global Labor Rights.
9. Reform the Financial System to Safely Serve the Productive Economy.
10. Invest in Energy Technologies that Drive a Sustainable Economy.
11. Reduce the Military Budget and Invest at Home.
12. Strengthen Democracy.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
91 replies, 27254 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (103)
ReplyReply to this post
91 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rank-and-file Democrats have been ready for a while, it's the Party leadership that has to be ...
Scuba
Dec 2014
#1
Absolutely right! They will just knock it down over time, the media will move on.
Dustlawyer
Dec 2014
#17
Occupy definitely changed the dialogue, you are correct. They invaded the space of those who
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#76
A huge obstacle, money in politics, like control of the media. More and more are overworked,
appalachiablue
Dec 2014
#58
That was what Democrats ran on in the midterms, the mass media drowned it all out using media
Fred Sanders
Dec 2014
#3
I'm sorry, if that's all you saw. That makes you like all the citizens who chose not to vote.
mountain grammy
Dec 2014
#24
The problem is, I think, our message is out there but it's been trashed so
mountain grammy
Dec 2014
#40
"the majority of Americans are ok with the extreme policies of the previous administration"
NewDeal_Dem
Dec 2014
#67
I think the polls are bunk. It's easy to phrase poll questions to get the answers you want.
NewDeal_Dem
Dec 2014
#73
WTF. Your remark is inflamatory false equivalence. Majority Democrats ran as centrists/conservatives
whereisjustice
Dec 2014
#66
Thank you, you are correct. I didn't hear a progressive message here in my state. Cuomo won
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#78
Mean, petty campaigns carried by mean and petty media lusting for ad cash.....we all saw that.
Fred Sanders
Dec 2014
#70
Voting itself is not the answer. Those that vote blind and bolster the 1% are worse than
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#79
Part of the "dilemma" is that some here think all DU and all Democrats are liberal/progressives.
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#82
I find your standards for a liberal label are pretty sane and reasonable..
mountain grammy
Dec 2014
#85
Yes I agree. Another thing I think is very important is that you can't give up your principles
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#86
Media terrorism. That's a perfect label for the mainstream garbage. n/t
mountain grammy
Dec 2014
#41
"That was what Democrats ran on in the midterms," No way. They ran on, "We are not as bad as the
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#64
I didn't hear that message. I heard a centrist, 'cautious' message. So did the voters so they
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#77
If you saw Democratic candidates running on progressive issues, then your definition of progressive
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#80
Sorry I didn't realize it was a group. I saw this on the latest threads. If we aren't supposed to
doc03
Dec 2014
#12
The thingy is fine but the fun is if you read a post without it and get that it is humor or whatever
Hoppy
Dec 2014
#45
"...the insanity of Rugged Individualism...the total lack of community and compassion..."
CrispyQ
Dec 2014
#46
Right? I thought it was, until I started paying attention around the time of Clinton. nt
RiverLover
Dec 2014
#39
Probably luckier to have had Mrs. Roosevelt, since much of what worked was at her insistence.
jtuck004
Dec 2014
#74
You're so right, & as a female myself, I should definitely recognise her great influence.
RiverLover
Dec 2014
#83
" It's just easier to say FDR." < I know <G> I just like to make sure and throw those little
jtuck004
Dec 2014
#84
Good Democratic policy, but it won't ever fly in our current, Corporate, rightwing Democratic Party.
blkmusclmachine
Dec 2014
#54
I think this should stay pinned to the top of the group. It is an excellent overview of
sabrina 1
Jan 2015
#91