Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

LAS14

(14,853 posts) Sat Nov 16, 2019, 05:21 PM Nov 2019

If we're all limited to $2500 (real people), how do rich donor parties benefit candidates? nt

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

If we're all limited to $2500 (real people), how do rich donor parties benefit candidates? nt (Original Post) LAS14 Nov 2019 OP

It goes to a PAC. Phoenix61 Nov 2019 #1

superpacs. rainin Nov 2019 #2

PACs... VarryOn Nov 2019 #3

Rudy can help OhNo-Really Nov 2019 #4

Crookedly. BuffaloJackalope Nov 2019 #5

Phoenix61

(17,752 posts)

1. It goes to a PAC.

Reply to LAS14 (Original post)

Sat Nov 16, 2019, 05:25 PM

Nov 2019

The PAC is supposed to operate independently of the campaign.

rainin

(3,196 posts)

2. superpacs.

Reply to LAS14 (Original post)

Sat Nov 16, 2019, 05:31 PM

Nov 2019

Groups organized to support a candidate can take in tens of millions to support the candidate of their choice. No accountability, no transparency.

VarryOn

(2,343 posts)

3. PACs...

Reply to LAS14 (Original post)

Sat Nov 16, 2019, 05:32 PM

Nov 2019

The $2500 limit doesnt really matter. If you have the money and want to get blow your money supporting a party, candidate or cause, there are ways.

I maxed out with Obama in 2008 and 2012 and had no shortage of organizations showing me how to give more to help him out. And all legal.

OhNo-Really

(3,996 posts)

4. Rudy can help

Reply to LAS14 (Original post)

Sat Nov 16, 2019, 05:37 PM

Nov 2019

BuffaloJackalope

(818 posts)

5. Crookedly.

Reply to LAS14 (Original post)

Sat Nov 16, 2019, 05:43 PM

Nov 2019

It might be "legal", but it ain't right by any stretch.

Reply to this discussion