Assuming tfg doesn't testify, who would the defense call as defense witnesses?

[Piratedog]

I don’t see anyone being able to testify on his behalf.

[C_U_L8R]

1. They'll flood the zone with crazy

and hope they confuse at least one juror with random bullshit.

[Sneederbunk]

2. John Barron character witness

[Joinfortmill]

4. ROFL

[underpants]

5. Mr. Barron, how awesome is the defendant?

He’s the best. Many people say he’s the best President ever. When I was President…
Uh Mr. Barron
I meant when is the awesome President going to be here? I was hoping he’d be here.

[Captain Zero]

3. Oh there's dumbasses that will do it

No one expects the cross examination (from Jack Smith.)

[Piratedog]

6. Maybe the pillow guy?

[Takket]

7. MTG? Kari Lake? LOL

[dweller]

8. 1,000 or more

Convicted insurrectionists come to mind … in Orange jumpsuits and shuffling in chains to disclaim he called them to action



✌🏻

[Cartoonist]

9. Dinesh

Too bad Robertson departed.

[RANDYWILDMAN]

10. Rudy rudy rudy

it would be so fun to hear him testify, but about 5 minutes versus smith and crew he and don two scoops would be in much worse legal shape then they are now.

Should be a very short trial

[ExWhoDoesntCare]

11. He had all kinds of people working for him

People we never saw on TV or even talked about in the press, but who would swear they never saw him trying to overturn the election.

I think some of the defense will come from putting people on the stand to tear down the testimony of a Cassidy Hutchinson or, say, Mark Meadows. Maybe call forth those low-level flunkies. Or ex-boyfriends of Hutchinson. Or whoever knows Meadows well enough to stab him good in the back.

The defense will be nitpicking about acquisition of evidence, and neutralizing the testimony of prosecution witnesses. They don't have much else in their arsenal.

[lindysalsagal]

12. They even indicted the fool's driver...

Maybe the white house chef?