General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow do you consume "television"?
Last edited Sat Jan 6, 2024, 01:10 AM - Edit history (1)
I read an article today about how subscription television is bleeding out subscribers and is no longer the dominant model. I got wondering how DU folks get their TV. (Im streaming only with zero consumption of live broadcast-type TV. Have been since the aughts.)
NOTE: This poll isnt asking how much TV you watch, just how you watch it. I dont watch much at all, but when I do, its streaming.
Defining some terms as I use them here:
Streaming: Use streaming services like Netflix, Amazon Prime, library apps such as Kanopy or Hoopla, etc. to watch films or TV shows over the internet, on demand (no set schedule, mostly). You could be watching content from these services via a Roku, FireStick, AppleTV, or simply on a computer or internet-connected television.
Live TV addon: View live broadcast events and shows (local news or spores, e.g.) at scheduled times over the internet via your streaming service. Examples are Hulu +Live and YouTube TV.
Traditional reception: Use a digital antenna to watch locally broadcast TV channels without cost or subscription. This is the way we watched TV before the invention of cable TV.
Added definition
Television: Programming, not the device. You could watch television programming on your phone or computer, or a game console.
72 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
Streaming only (no live TV addon, no "traditional" reception via antenna) | |
19 (26%) |
|
Streaming with live TV addon and/or traditional reception via antenna | |
21 (29%) |
|
Streaming AND cable or satellite subscription | |
16 (22%) |
|
Cable or satellite subscription only (no streaming services) | |
6 (8%) |
|
I don't watch TV at all but I watch films at home (via DVD or other physical media) | |
2 (3%) |
|
I don't watch TV or films at home | |
5 (7%) |
|
Other (Please explain in the comments) | |
3 (4%) |
|
0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
jcgoldie
(12,046 posts)But welcome to rural America 8 miles outside a town of 30 k... satellite... $100/50 GB.
LearnedHand
(4,221 posts)I have satellite internet from motherfucker Eloon, but its fast and dependable as hell. Expensive as hell too. $120/mo, but NO data caps! I both work from home and do streaming only and never have an issue.
Fast means about 150 down and 8-10 up. After the shit service Ive had before, this is like Cadillac internet.
jcgoldie
(12,046 posts)But I was on the prelist and pulled my application before they got to me because... well fuck that guy.
LearnedHand
(4,221 posts)But then sucked it up and ordered it anyway. I had TMobile 5G just before, and it was blazing fast, but they limit you to 100GB of 5G data. I was running close to that limit each month, so I paid for a second AT&T 4G LTE doodad that gave me another 100GB of data. That was more than 200/mo just to support WFH and streaming.
If a decent human being or company ever offers an alternative satellite service Ill snap it up.
Check this out...
https://www.fcc.gov/acp
It's the Rural Connectivity Program.
Qualifications include senior citizen, rural resident and others. I pay $60/month for my ISP, nothing else and I watch MSNBC livestreamed. Totally worth looking into.
hunter
(39,059 posts)My mom's family, living on their ranch about as far away as you can get from any civilization in the 48 states, had both telephone and electric service, thanks to Franklin Delano Roosevelt.
Rural high speed internet is an inexpensive and almost trivial technical problem compared to that.
jcgoldie
(12,046 posts)We vacation every other year or so in Yelapa Mexico... its an indigenous fishing village with a lot of expat hippies who dropped out at some point. Its south of Puerto Vallarta near the southern rim of Banderas Bay. It is only accessible by boat-ride about 40 minutes from Vallarta pier as it backs up to the mountains and the jungle. There are not even any cars there, the streets only wide enough for walking or horses (they do have 4 wheelers there now)... its not completely remote they do bring many tourists through every day on tours to see the water falls... but like I said its pretty far from anything and relatively hard to get to... and yet when we visit, our internet connection is about 50 times better than we have at home in southern Illinois less than 30 miles from St. Louis. I guess fucking Mexico has more resources for infrastructure eh?
LearnedHand
(4,221 posts)I could devolve into a frothing mass over how stupid this country is about internet connectivity. BTW, I also had sterling cellphone reception in those places.
Ms. Toad
(35,619 posts)We have zero (or very limited) access to local TV without cost or subscription. (Prior to the converstion, we got fuzzy analog. Now we get nothing most of the year due to hils, trees, and distance from transmitting stations.)
LearnedHand
(4,221 posts)I had a big snowstorm yesterday and my satellite internet was unaffected. I hate to say it, but I recommend StarLink if its available in your area.
Ms. Toad
(35,619 posts)LearnedHand
(4,221 posts)They announced recently that the entire country is now covered. (Ugh AT&T).
https://www.starlink.com/map
Attilatheblond
(4,561 posts)Not surprised.
LearnedHand
(4,221 posts)Meanwhile, people much further out than met got StarLink. I mean I get that, but I was just as bereft of high-speed service as those further out. They enabled it pretty quickly though, and I bet theyll do that for the Sells area.
Attilatheblond
(4,561 posts)LearnedHand
(4,221 posts)Im in a broadcast dead zone. If I wanted to watch live TV Id have to subscribe to some service. I dont mourn the loss at all, but I do occasionally pull up a local news segment to find out about a specific event. Its not in realtime though; I just go to their website and watch the recorded segment.
Ms. Toad
(35,619 posts)Every once in a while, in the winter, late at night, we are able to get one or two mainstream stations. Other than that, we get multiple versions of all-Jesus-all-the-time-in-at-least-two-languages - so we don't bother.
LearnedHand
(4,221 posts)And excuse me but I laughed right out loud at all Jesus all the time. Its the Number One Point Five Reason I killed subscription TV (Dish Network at that time). First reason was because of six thousand channels I never watched and fuck them for counting me among the Fox Noise audience because their package included it.
Xolodno
(6,760 posts)But were getting ready to drop it. When DirecTV came out it was great, then we kept getting more channels we didn't watch and the bill kept going up. Then we went streaming....now the same problem.
Now we are just going to drop all subs save one. And change it out once we are done and want to see something else. Or just purchase the series separately.
LearnedHand
(4,221 posts)When I dropped cable for streaming only in the mid 2000s, the only streaming services were Netflix and Amazon Prime. I totally purchased the shows digitally or on DVD.
Kali
(55,876 posts)others in the house use netflix, hulu, youtube, dvds and even vcr tapes.
LearnedHand
(4,221 posts)Although much less frequently. For example I own Battlestar Galactica on DVD, but its because I want to make sure the streaming services cant disappear it! Most of the later things I dont care whether they disappear lol.
2naSalit
(93,487 posts)On a laptop. All I have with a screen on it.
I have simple internet and participate in the Rural Connectivity Program to reduce the cost.
And I am thankful for these things.
LearnedHand
(4,221 posts)Or do you have a subscription that provides it? So glad for the Rural Broadband Program! I dont use it but Im glad my tax dollars help others use it!
2naSalit
(93,487 posts)Silent3
(15,909 posts)We've got YouTube TV for broadcast TV content.
I know, for technical reasons, "Live" isn't ever truly live, but I wondered how much delay we might be experiencing. There's satellite uplink/downlink delay, deliberate delay in case someone wants to censor something, video processing and buffering, etc. (There was typically much less delay back in the days of analog TV.)
So, as New Year's Eve approached New Year's Day of this year, I turned on the TV to watch the ball drop in Times Square. I was also looking at a GPS-synced clock for precise time.
When the countdown chant ended, and everyone shouted "Happy New Year!", the new year was already 47 seconds old.
LearnedHand
(4,221 posts)But I mean it only in the sense that you must watch it when they broadcast it, as they broadcast it, as opposed to shows like Good Omens or Handmaids Tale, which are available to watch on demand at any time.
Silent3
(15,909 posts)There's on-demand content with YouTube TV as well, but that's seldom where we get on-demand stuff from.
LearnedHand
(4,221 posts)hunter
(39,059 posts)My wife has never watched television news and opinion. I quit in disgust shortly after 9/11/2001.
Then we quit cable television, mostly because it was too expensive and we weren't watching it.
The last broadcast television show we watched was the finale of Chuck which was January 27, 2012. We moved our television shortly after that and didn't even bother to hook up an antenna. Our current television isn't programmed to receive any channels or connect to the internet.
Over the years we've tried a couple of streaming options -- dongles, "smart" blu-ray players, etc. -- and I don't recommend any of them since they all try to sell you advertising supported television now.
For a few years we were only watching DVDs we rented or bought in thrift stores. Sometimes we buy new DVDs for movies we especially like. We have a large library of them.
One of our children, home from college for a break, set us up with Netflix. We usually subscribe to one or two other streaming services in addition to that. When we get bored with a streaming service we quit.
We don't watch any television with advertising. Any advertising that moves or makes noise is banished from my computers too. I've come to find television advertising intolerable. If I can't make such advertising go away from a place I simply don't go there.
I blame "traditional television" for both Reagan and Trump. It needs to die.
Our grown children and their cousins pay no attention at all to television or radio as we knew it. They only care about their internet connections.
My wife and I have always been more interested in reading than television. Our television budget is about $35 a month. I try not to think about how much we spend on books, magazines, and newspapers. Our e-books have probably saved our house from collapsing under the weight of them.
LearnedHand
(4,221 posts)I quit broadcast news about the same time as you and quit subscription TV (satellite TV for me) for the same reason, although earlier. I watch ad-free as well because ands are intolerable and fuck the advertising industry. Im currently stewing about Amazon Prime, which I get with my Prime membership. Theyre going to inject ads and require a 3/mo fee ADDITIONAL to not watch them. Im considering canceling the entire thing and just purchasing the Amazon series I watch.
Ohio Joe
(21,894 posts)Nuff said.
LearnedHand
(4,221 posts)Ohio Joe
(21,894 posts)Its hardware we bought at Walmart about two years ago. It works on the honor system If a show or movie streams on any service, Superbox pipes it into your home. You are only supposed to watch if you subscribe but there is nothing that stops you. It also has over 1400 live tv stations from around the country. Plus, it also has every sports game broadcast. For the $275 we spent, its pretty amazing.
LearnedHand
(4,221 posts)Roku isnt a streaming service (although they do have a freevee channel); its just a device that connects your tv to the internet and lets you add apps to watch other providers content. The main difference is that Roku is NOT an IPTV device, but SuperBox is. It looks like a very good option for people who want broadcast TV!
Ohio Joe
(21,894 posts)You can but Im not sure what Everything I listed is from the base app from Superbox.
Attilatheblond
(4,561 posts)Or is CSPAN not broadcast over streaming devices?
Ohio Joe
(21,894 posts)I forget how many off the top of my head but I know it has several.
hunter
(39,059 posts)... I don't watch their stuff.
That's my philosophy with computer software too, which is why I'm a Debian Linux guy and not a Windows or Apple guy.
I'm also wary of hosting devices loaded with sketchy software of unknown provenance on my home network.
If I'm the farm boy dread pirate it's always been my philosophy to go big or go not at all. Or maybe I'm gonna eat the devil fruit, wear the straw hat, and have my own ship.
I don't want to be the guy from Indiana Jones who chose poorly.
I heard about it from a friend who had been using it for a year with no issues and weve had it now for nearly two years with no issues so
Do what is best for you.
Edit - Also, Im not some newb, I worked as a developer ( of a variety of ranks) for over 30 years.
Demovictory9
(33,968 posts)LearnedHand
(4,221 posts)Thanks for the interesting discussion so far!
HAB911
(9,371 posts)Smart TV(with apps) and an Home Theater PC on another network(Spectrum)
way too much, but it was an evolution not a design, lol
Sympthsical
(10,399 posts)Amazon and Disney/Hulu/ESPN are our staples, because we have Prime and D/H/E is somehow folded into my cell phone plan.
Then we just build up shows/movies we want to watch and might select activating a subscription that month. This past month we've been working through various things on Max. Last month we had Netflix, because I was finishing up the Crown and he was watching Heartstoppers (to my incredulous jeering in the background).
We're honestly both mainly YouTube people with an ad blocker. Partner watches all kinds of cooking shows and home improvement things, and I watch documentaries, gaming things, film/book discussion/criticism, and random nonsense (there can never be too many air disaster shows). We used to have all of the streaming stuff, but then realized we barely watched a lot of them.
I haven't had cable since about 2015. It isn't even a principled "Everything is garbage!" thing - even though it is. It just became wildly expensive for a service I was not really using. Network shows aren't really on our radar. So $60/month for 1TB internet, then $20 baseline streaming and whatever else we add that month. Keeps it simple stupid.
Anything important on this earth eventually ends up on YouTube. Partner is super into NFL and Basketball, but all of the half hour highlight reels are . . . on YouTube.
LearnedHand
(4,221 posts)But I will NEVER AGAIN pay for Fox News, religious programming, right-wing programming, or shopping TV. Same thing goes for satellite car radio. Theyve taken the cable TV approach and Ill never do that.
Sympthsical
(10,399 posts)I'd call them back, cut a deal to trim it down to $160, then it'd start climbing again.
And I finally realized I was only really watching HBO at the time for various shows. Once HBO became a stand-alone streaming app, I decided I was done throwing money out the window.
As more and more streaming apps worked with Chromecast and similar tv dongles, there just wasn't a need to have cable to experience high quality programming and movies on the main tv.
muriel_volestrangler
(102,693 posts)There are streaming services you pay for, and there are ones that are more or less "catch-up TV" internet services from broadcasters. I (in the UK) do not subscribe to any service, but I do make use of the streaming services of the broadcasters. I probably watch more live than streamed.
LearnedHand
(4,221 posts)Youre consuming the content not in real time (not at a specified broadcast time) and over an internet connection. I think what Im really getting at is two things:
Do people subscribe to any provider or service that provides a live TV watching experience? (You can only watch when the content is broadcast, e.g.) And
Do people get cable/satellite content from traditional broadcast networks, internet-only, on-demand content, or both.
Elessar Zappa
(16,082 posts)Im sure Ill eventually do away with the cable though.
LearnedHand
(4,221 posts)Honest question! And Im thinking of, like, maybe content you can only get via broadcast? Something else?
An aside: Many years ago, I was trying to explain to my mom what streaming television meant. (She kept saying, Oh, thats right. You dont have TV. LOL) I was spectacularly unsuccessful until just a few years ago when I forgot to sign out of Netflix when I left her house. She suddenly discovered the joy of on-demand movies! She still never understood the difference but definitely enjoyed the service!
Elessar Zappa
(16,082 posts)Plus I like to watch ABC, NBC, CBS, and FOX, because my digital antenna doesnt catch any networks where I live.
mike_c
(36,392 posts)Going on forty years, since the 1980s. In recent years I've begun watching YouTube videos occasionally, mostly individuals documenting something cool that they've accomplished, like cycling across continents or building a boat. Of course, those sorts of videos have only been available in relatively recent years.
I utterly despise commercial television programming. I don't watch movies or any other films, etc. Haven't in decades. How many hours do people waste watching the squawking box? Life is too short for that.
LearnedHand
(4,221 posts)But after Breaking Bad cast down the gauntlet, content creators really upped their game. The past 15 years or so have seen some of the best writing and acting Ive seen outside of movies. I dont watch TV in the traditional sense. I watch a few very good, ad-free series. I just happen to consume it on a large-screen monitor called a TV.