General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWaPo flooded by cancellations
I hope there are more cancellations to come!
Washington Post' flooded by cancellations after Bezos' non-endorsement decision
https://www.npr.org/2024/10/28/nx-s1-5168416/washington-post-bezos-endorsement-president-cancellations-resignations
pat_k
(10,883 posts)Perhaps post about it here to inspire others.
Call to Action: Tell WaPo what you think. Write a letter to the editor. If you subscribe, cancel.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100219608577
kevink077
(474 posts)The owner deserves the boycott. I hate seeing an iconic paper and staff by hurt by the coward(s) at the top.
Ninga
(8,633 posts)directly to the fact that ownership has thwarted the independence that should be afforded to journalism in a free Sociey.
The employees are free to move on if they are unhappy.
Joinfortmill
(16,631 posts)Xavier Breath
(5,173 posts)It will hurt only the journalists and staffers at the paper, not Bezos. For him the financial fallout would be little more than a rounding error.
Ninga
(8,633 posts)hours after he withdrew the endorsement process. Clearly his commitment to democracy is shakey and conditional to his personal circumstances.
What are citizen soldiers to do?
Say oh well but the journalists?
I say. Subscribe to another publication that has editorial and journalistic integrity.
Xavier Breath
(5,173 posts)FrankBooth
(1,816 posts)But you go ahead and subscribe to WaPo since you're so worried about the journalists there.
onecaliberal
(36,332 posts)The majority does NOT support.
LetMyPeopleVote
(155,536 posts)jimfields33
(19,317 posts)Guess whos going to feel the hurt? The staff that will be laid off next month if this is noticed in the quarterlys.
Ocelot II
(121,502 posts)it would barely make a dent in his bank accounts. It's pocket change for him. Cancelling subscriptions won't hurt Bezos; for that matter, neither will cancelling your Amazon Prime account. However, not cancelling your subscription implicitly gives permission to other news outlets who aren't so rich to be similarly cowardly. It's the only way we can send the message.
My subscription was due to reup the 26th. I decided to cancel on the 25th. I dont think people realize how much Amazon Web Services contributes to Amazons net income. Sure Amazon.com brings in more revenue, but their profit and growth has been on the web. One way to hurt Bezos is to deny him government contracts. Im guessing AWSs government $ dwarfs Blue Origins. I dont even care about hurting Bezos. I havent trusted the paper since the William Lewis hire and this move further substantiates my fears about the papers direction.
StarryNite
(10,911 posts)"One of those writers, Molly Roberts, warned of the possible consequences of the eleventh-hour decision to stay quiet rather than publish the editorial endorsing Harris. "Donald Trump is not yet a dictator," she wrote in a statement she posted on social media. "But the quieter we are, the closer he comes." ~ Over 200,000 subscribers flee 'Washington Post' after Bezos blocks Harris endorsement
Never be afraid to raise your voice for honesty and truth and compassion against injustice and lying and greed. If people all over the world...would do this, it would change the earth.
― William Faulkner
Nimble_Idea
(2,476 posts)he did it after his people met with the dumspter
then says wink wink, nothing to see here
what a clnutz.
orthoclad
(4,728 posts)That's where his money is. It's a nefarious biz draining the blood of commerce, replacing local employers with min-wagers who only have time to pee in jars.
Rolling Stone has a list of alternatives:
https://www.rollingstone.com/product-recommendations/lifestyle/best-amazon-alternatives-1136987/
Thrive Market
Hive
Grove Collaborative
Public Goods
World Market
Chewy
Uncommon Goods
Etsy
Temu
Instacart
Target
Fuck Bezos with his own dick-rocket.
pnwmom
(109,636 posts)orthoclad
(4,728 posts)Nimble_Idea
(2,476 posts)but yeah, target and other sites are going to be my go to from here on out. Im banning my family from using Amazonazi.
PeaceWave
(1,059 posts)Ninga
(8,633 posts)the margins. If Bezos doesnt want his name associated with the sinking of the WaPo, he can self fund it in a heartbeat.
I see no earthly reason why i should pay for a publication that has an owner who dictates editorial content.
Democracy dies in Darkness - self fulfilling
onecaliberal
(36,332 posts)I wont support financially anything that can be weaponized against good people and democracy.
Fullduplexxx
(8,364 posts)Nimble_Idea
(2,476 posts)AllaN01Bear
(23,333 posts)orthoclad
(4,728 posts)Go to the source.
lpbk2713
(43,201 posts)... if Wapo has to tighten its belt.
The a-holes in the Board Room won't feel a thing.
GiqueCee
(1,519 posts)... will even dent his goldfish food budget. But he'll sure as hell know that he is despised, and that will hit his bottom line eventually. And that's all that greedy sonofabitch cares about.
DENVERPOPS
(10,158 posts)is far less than the Tax Breaks he got under Trump...........He has now, officially bowed down, and kissed Trump's ass.......
GiqueCee
(1,519 posts)... how he liked the taste.
Emile
(30,798 posts)FrankBooth
(1,816 posts)But until then, he's there and muzzling journalists. So fuck him and fuck them.
Espoir
(15 posts)I have very little agency in the outcome of this election. I have a vote, I have a subscription, I have donations.
I'd love to have more levers to pull but I don't. So the subscription is canceled. I also have mixed feelings, as I loved reading WaPo. I first subscribed in 2016 when they became one of the Enemies of The People. It's what I could do, so I decided to subsidize my free press as I truly consider it to be a pillar of democracy and a free society.
I no longer fully trust the intentions of WaPo, and am uncertain of what's been filtered. That's the price of muzzling some content but saying "trust me". They're free to regain my trust, and I hope they do, but until then I am taking what little action I have available to me. To do nothing seems acquiescent.
Nimble_Idea
(2,476 posts)the paper may have earned trust when it was the so called enemy of dumpster
but egghead bought it, and like eloon, gonna ass crack it.
Scrivener7
(53,202 posts)aggiesal
(9,526 posts)I sent this in their Comment Section
I guess the lights just went out on Democracy.
Your decision, based on your motto "Democracy Dies in Darkness", is Irony Deficient.
Darnell1972
(17 posts)Ive canceled and wont be going back- ever. Bezos now wants, more conservative columnists. Someone else can read those. I certainly wont.
BlueKota
(3,727 posts)conservative columnists. For the people saying they won't cancel because they don't want the honest top journalists to be fired, do you honestly think a guy who hired a right wing former foot soldier of Rupert Murdoch will be keeping them around much longer anyway?
And billionaires aren't exactly known for treating there supporting staffers fairly in terms of pay, and benefits to begin with.
Nimble_Idea
(2,476 posts)harder to do with the Amazon, but gonna do it!
Scrivener7
(53,202 posts)shop at Amazon for the reason, "but the brick and mortar store workers!" Same with people saying "but the Amazon workers." Those jobs are the direct result of the loss of brick and mortar store jobs.
There were hundreds of thousands of brick and mortar store workers, and while they were often mentioned, I don't remember anyone saying we should inconvenience ourselves to save their jobs. And what we're talking about here is a lot more than inconveniencing ourselves.
Why the difference?
Those reporters can go to a reasonable publication. I'd love to see them start another paper themselves.
Organizations fail. If this one fails, it will be for good reason.