Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Omnipresent

(6,362 posts)
1. The poll doesn't show Kamala with a 51 to 48 lead...
Tue Nov 5, 2024, 09:51 AM
Nov 5

Instead it shows a 47 to 44 lead.
Who are the 9% that aren’t voting for either candidate?

TwilightZone

(28,833 posts)
2. 3% to RFK Jr, some to other third party, some didn't want to answer, 3% undecided
Tue Nov 5, 2024, 09:54 AM
Nov 5
Fewer than 1% say they would vote for Libertarian presidential candidate Chase Oliver, 1% would vote for someone else, 3% aren’t sure and 2% don’t want to say for whom they already cast a ballot.


https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/politics/iowa-poll/2024/11/02/iowa-poll-kamala-harris-leads-donald-trump-2024-presidential-race/75354033007/

TwilightZone

(28,833 posts)
4. Iowa isn't really indicative of anything other than Iowa.
Tue Nov 5, 2024, 09:56 AM
Nov 5

The campaign has been downplaying this poll and has said not to read too much into it.

Predicting a landslide based solely on one poll in Iowa is kind of the epitome of reading too much into it.

edisdead

(3,359 posts)
5. I feel like
Tue Nov 5, 2024, 10:00 AM
Nov 5

I feel like the campaign has been downplaying everything to avoid a 2016 situation where people thought they could vote 3rd part or not at all and still be safe.

TwilightZone

(28,833 posts)
8. Possible, though Harris's campaign manager has been very positive about trends, etc.
Tue Nov 5, 2024, 10:07 AM
Nov 5

Downplaying the poll is a little out of recent character, but as you said, tempering expectations is often the norm. She said the race was very close, all of the swing states were in play, and it was an MOE race, but the trends were good.

That's kind of the approach I've been taking. Cautiously optimistic. Prepared for it to be close, but a big win would only makes things better. I'm not going to celebrate until it's official, but I also think we're good.

lees1975

(6,008 posts)
6. Another similar poll popped up in New Hampshire, Dartmouth, which also has a solid reputation.
Tue Nov 5, 2024, 10:02 AM
Nov 5

And had her with a huge lead in NH, similar demographic figures.

Johnny2X2X

(21,795 posts)
9. NC is what I am watching
Tue Nov 5, 2024, 10:07 AM
Nov 5

NC goes blue and it's a fun night.

And how quickly reasonably competitive states are called is also a key. NH is blue for sure, but he was leading Biden there, if that gets called almost immediately, she is overperforming. In 2016, Indiana was supposed to be competitive, when they called it immediately, I knew we were in trouble.

dsp3000

(647 posts)
10. North carolina is the one i'll be watching tonight too. after that popping a sleeping pill and going to try to go to bed
Tue Nov 5, 2024, 10:11 AM
Nov 5

TwilightZone

(28,833 posts)
11. I'd settle for the seven swingers.
Tue Nov 5, 2024, 10:23 AM
Nov 5

Or any combination thereof that gets us to 270.

Florida is just bizarre this cycle. Rs have a one million vote edge in early voting. I have no clue what's going on there. If we somehow made that up today, it would be the weirdest comeback in memory.

I'm in Texas. I think the Senate race is more likely than the top line, but I'd take either or both. Late voters usually break right, but maybe we can break the trend. We're certainly trying.

Ohio would be hilarious if for no other reason than Vance.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»He could lose in a landsl...