General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums'Pod Save America' Host Calls Biden's Choice To Run Again 'Catastrophic'
Nov 9, 2024, 02:58 PM EST
Pod Save America host Jon Favreau slammed President Joe Bidens decision to run for a second presidential term on a Friday episode analyzing Vice President Kamala Harris loss to GOP President-elect Donald Trump.
Joe Bidens decision to run for president again was a catastrophic mistake, the podcaster and former speechwriter for President Barack Obama said. It just was.
Link to tweet
Snip
The host also excoriated Bidens campaign for claiming the polls were fine after the presidents disastrous June debate against Trump even though, Favreau said, the campaigns internal polling at the time showed that Donald Trump was going to win 400 electoral votes. (A source described as close to Biden disputed those numbers in a comment to Mediaite.)
In August, the head of Democratic super PAC Future Forward revealed that its own forecast models, while not as dire as the internal polling Favreau described, had only put the probability of Biden winning in the single digits prior to his stepping down.
Snip
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/pod-save-america-blames-biden_n_672fac20e4b0076892d7e05f
Deuxcents
(19,598 posts)LisaL
(46,587 posts)NT
Fish700
(62 posts)If so I didn't know about them.
Ocelot II
(120,644 posts)I hate to see people dragging on Joe now. He was a hero just a week ago. "Victory has a thousand fathers, but defeat is an orphan."
JI7
(90,454 posts)but him even just being consideref for VP brought out certain haters. And if he lost people would be saying we should never have had a Jewish person on the ticket becsuse of what is going on in middle east and claiming we would have won the Muslim vote otherwise .
Zeitghost
(4,489 posts)An open and well fought primary comes in.
dutch777
(3,447 posts)...we have to get our folks 1) elected and 2) and empowered to actually govern. Almost jokingly I wrote to the WH and here on DU that in 2022 or so that Biden should step down within his Presidency on medical grounds and elevate Kamala. YEARS before the convention let alone the election. I also said, as Pelosi was still Speaker, that Kamala should do the same, just to make millions of MAGA heads explode. Yes, it would be temporary to some extent but also telling. Women are perfectly capable. Maybe just perfect. I was joking to an extent but was also suggesting a strategic level of thought that now seems prescient. We were too far behind the power curve and Joe, wonderful, wonderful, Joe, was not the guy to take us to the next step. Now we go to the hinterlands, hoping to at best be the loyal opposition until 2026 and I would wager now, well beyond that.
BannonsLiver
(17,894 posts)But in the end I thought his record and public fear of trump would win out. But I wouldnt have dared to bring those thoughts here at that time.
brush
(57,391 posts)As far as VP Harris resigning along with him, no. Her serving out his term would've given her the incumbent advantage in '24 against whoever the rethugs ran. It would've also given her two years to show her competence and ability to the nation.
In It to Win It
(9,486 posts)standingtall
(2,946 posts)Can't get your way down the stretch forcing Biden out taking away his opportunity to get reelected then lose everything The Presidency,The Senate and probably the house and then turn around and put the bulk of the blame on the Biden/Harris administration.
brush
(57,391 posts)That was the way to go. If VP Harris had run then she would've sunk or swam like all the other candidates and Black voters would have no complaints of the party skipping over her.
From the great job she did having been dropped into this unprecedented situation, seems she learned a lot from the 2020 run and may have won the nomination.
Too bad we didn't stick to the one-term transitional plan.
bigtree
(90,093 posts)...how do you get a primary when no one who could ostensibly beat him stepped up?
In It to Win It
(9,486 posts)The Party wasn't going to abandon our incumbent unless our incumbent said he wasn't going to run.
bigtree
(90,093 posts)...most of us went into that primary assuming he had the party behind him.
They were, not a word until after the debate.
Hindsight. I think people are kidding themselves about ANY move by Biden to step aside making things better.
And any candidate that thought he could compete better than a historically sucessful incumbent sure stayed quiet. But we can pretend they were just chilling because Joe had declared.
That's not the way this works. There would still be political consequences for the president who's record ANYONE would need to run on telling the nation he just wasn't up to it.
He was betrayed by a vocal group of legislators who bear all of the responsibility for blowing up the elected nominee's chances with their whinging about his age.
Now lookey what we have. People who voted in that primary didn't cast their ballot for any of what came after they chose Joe to run.
Wonder how many of them stayed home...
In It to Win It
(9,486 posts)In 2020, I didn't expect Joe Biden to run for re-election. I was actually shocked when Joe Biden announced he was running again.
But once he announced he was running for re-election, what was anyone going to do other than make Joe Biden look bad? or create a situation where people become down on Joe Biden?
What if we had a primary challenge that actually had a fighting chance and Joe Biden survives that challenge and becomes our nominee. Now, all the negative shit that primary challenger said is now ads for Republicans. All of that negative shit puts people down on Biden, and if he's our nominee after a primary challenge, that's not a good place to be in.
Instead of Joe Biden being challenged, he clears the field by announcing he's not running for re-election and you let a batch of new candidates duke it out, and the best one wins.
brush
(57,391 posts)It's not complicated and has been done before.
Prairie Gates
(2,909 posts)JI7
(90,454 posts)but i guess there is a chance a straight white man would have won and if he campaigned as well as Kamala could have won without being hurt due to sexism and racism .
Skittles
(158,658 posts)nope
valleyrogue
(1,075 posts)of assholes who didn't want a woman president.
Why do people refuse to see the obvious?
Deminpenn
(16,271 posts)Then he and all the others who thought they were so smart couldn't deliver a victory despite having a good candidate, all the money they needed and more.
Want someone to blame? Look in the mirror, then shut up. Geesh,
Skittles
(158,658 posts)and this is pretty much exactly why
LiberalArkie
(16,424 posts)I notice it even more these days when he talks and walking around.
It must have really been noticeable to people around him on a daily basis.
If Joe had planned it out 2 years ago and let Kamala take a leadership role in daily stuff. Like attending the foreign meetings. Giving the speeches instead of Joe doing it. I think she would have won easily.
Skittles
(158,658 posts)I think you are understating sexism and racism in America, it is fucking RAMPANT. Add to that the corporate media sane-washing Trump.....try to imagine if Kamala had five kids by three different men and would talk about Arnold Palmer's junk and mimic oral sex - can you EVEN......
LiberalArkie
(16,424 posts)but the stupidity I did not. I did not believe how many people who live around me did not believe that we had put people on the moon. Not just belief but to the point that it was not possble and anyone thinking it was crazy. I encountered a neighbor who flew with his job all over the world and said the world is flat because when you are way in the air, all you see outside is a disc. Anyone saying anything different is lying.
We have a big problem
genxlib
(5,683 posts)Biden should have never run in 2020.
There are people who will hate this but I dont want a candidate older than low sixties because I want to have a reasonable chance at 12 years worth of viability. Anyone older runs a high risk of either running out of steam or giving up the advantage of incumbency. I tried to say this at the time and I was right.
The caveat to this is Sanders shouldnt have run either. He had the same age issues. He skewed the field in such a way that Biden was the only one that could survive long enough to overcome him. A primary without them would have cleared the way for a real contest to elevate the next generation
I fully expect to be flamed. Go ahead. It cant be any worse than watching this disaster play out in slow motion for 6 years.
Skittles
(158,658 posts)BunkieBandit
(107 posts)after his first demonstrably successful first term, we, they, them, the world, the universe would have screamed and swung from the rafters raising three kinds of hell. Just like what's happening now. Damned if you do, damned if you don't. Lose/lose for President Joseph Biden. Blast me or block me.
JCMach1
(28,051 posts)Got first nominated and then elected because he was the equivalent of comfort food during the pandemic.
That environment has completely evaporated and his ability to communicate took a huge hit with age ... Fairly, or unfairly.
valleyrogue
(1,075 posts)It was because of sexism, and, to a lesser degree, racism.
Quit blaming Democrats for the actions of the assholes who voted for Trump.
Skittles
(158,658 posts)yup
kansasobama
(1,460 posts)Don't blame Biden or Harris
valleyrogue
(1,075 posts)who are the idiots who voted for Trump.
Attilatheblond
(4,260 posts)Strong message to follow
mountain grammy
(27,230 posts)emulatorloo
(45,551 posts)As valleyrogue noted:
Quit blaming Democrats for the actions of the assholes who voted for Trump.