General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAlternet: Ex-federal prosecutor: Why Trump's NY 'sentencing should proceed promptly'
As President-Elect Donald Trump and his attorneys seek to make the MAGA leader's legal cases disappear following his election victory, former federal prosecutor Randall Eliason makes the case for why Trump's New York hush money case sentencing should still move forward.
"Out of an abundance of caution," Judge Juan "Merchan avoided a preelection sentencing that potentially could have influenced the election," Eliason writes in a Sunday op-ed published by The Atlantic. "But the election result changes nothing about the criminal case. Now that the election is over, sentencing should proceed promptly."
The George Washington University white-collar criminal law professor notes, "Once in office, Trump may cancel federal prosecutions of himself and his allies. He has threatened to use the Justice Department to pursue political opponents. He may seek to bend the justice system to his will in unprecedented ways. But that doesnt mean the DA or Merchan should 'obey in advance' by abandoning the jurys verdict."
The fact the president-elects lawyers "are essentially arguing that the election wipes the slate clean, that the people have spoken and all criminal matters must be dismissed," is pure "nonsense," Eliason emphasizes.
Although "a majority of voters apparently concluded that Trumps criminal cases were not disqualifyingjust as the sexual assaults, pandemic response, efforts to overturn the last election, and many other things apparently were not disqualifying," Eliason continues, "that doesnt mean they didnt happen or that Trump is not legally and morally responsible."
/snip
Tadpole Raisin
(1,532 posts)Yes we are in uncharted waters but he was found guilty and to say that the election requires the guilty verdict and sentencing to be reversed would be a travesty worse than what Ford did with Nixon.
It will affect his ability to be President. No it didnt- he was elected.
I think Merchan would be willing to sentence but wants the prosecutors to take a stand and not have it all on him. He was found guilty. Sentence him.
If the appeal reverses it thats no different than if the judge reversed it himself and we will know with absolute certainty that Presidents are immune. I would hope that by the time the appeal is well into being considered TSF will have done so many (more) horrible things that they see reversal would put the final nail in country coffin.
What is there to lose?
MrWowWow
(401 posts)-that begins if and after tramp is no longer president but still has a pulse??
Tadpole Raisin
(1,532 posts)SoCalDavidS
(10,599 posts)Its obvious by now that were in a different reality, so perhaps predict what will probably happen.
I expect a slap on the wrist, if were lucky. And the remaining Federal cases to go nowhere. Maybe the GA case gets pushed to 2029.