General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsYou don't get to be the party of the working class and call for cuts to Food Stamps and Medicaid to pay for tax cuts for
the wealthy. The most vulnerable members of the working class need those programs to survive. True working class jobs do not pay enough to afford healthcare and pay for food. Hours are inconsistent and layoffs happen at any time. People who have jobs that come with healthcare and pay them enough to afford to buy Ford F150 trucks brand new ARE NOT THE FUCKING WORKING CLASS.
The problem is our media only sees White men who work with their hands as working class instead of looking at statistical data such as median household income. The root of our problem is the media's continuous racial framing of economic issues.
XanaDUer2
(13,881 posts)Get cutoff. I'm sure they'll say dems gave the benefits to illegals. That's what my ssdi receiving sister said.
Yavin4
(36,394 posts)MAGATs gladly suffer in poverty so long as Black people suffer more. If they need healthcare, they just go to the emergency room and skip out on the bill which then gets passed onto everyone else.
CousinIT
(10,209 posts)I honestly wish they would invest in a year-round war room that does this 24x7. And purchase social media and mainstream media outlets to assist with that. They haven't fought back in any measurable way for years and we can't afford for this non-response from them to continue.
returnee
(282 posts)WhiskeyGrinder
(23,862 posts)THE FUCKING WORKING CLASS."
So...people who work in the Building Trades and in manufacturing jobs? They're not working class? Lol cmon now
Yavin4
(36,394 posts)If their median household income is above a certain level, then they are middle class. A unionized UPS driver making about $100K with healthcare and a pension is not working class. That is middle class.
You're using "vibes" instead of data. Just because someone works with their hands, that doesn't make them working class.
Yavin4
(36,394 posts)Median household income is $80K. The average household income is $114K. Bottom 25% is $40K and below. See for yourself at the link
Link: https://dqydj.com/household-income-percentile-calculator/
Granted the term, "working class", is ambiguous and imprecise. Investopedia has a decent definition of it. But as I said, the term is ambiguous.
"Working class" is a socioeconomic term used to describe persons in a social class marked by jobs that provide low pay, require limited skill, or physical labor. Typically, working-class jobs have reduced education requirements. Unemployed persons or those supported by a social welfare program are often included in the working class.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/w/working-class.asp
WhiskeyGrinder
(23,862 posts)And the investopedia "definition" doesn't exclude Building Trades, manufacturing, nursing, teaching or other jobs that are much more widely considered working class than an income-based definition.
Yavin4
(36,394 posts)These are people who work.
ShazzieB
(18,675 posts)It's the way social scientists define "middle class." There are other replies in here that explain that more fully.
Progressive dog
(7,243 posts)That is the criteria.
From Wikipedia Though the American middle class does not have a definitive definition, contemporary social scientists have put forward several ostensibly congruent theories on it. Depending on the class model used, the middle class constitutes anywhere from 25% to 75% of households
JustAnotherGen
(33,577 posts)They are. But lot'sa folks fixing to find out.
RobinA
(10,154 posts)vulgarian would disagree.
Autumn
(46,333 posts)But I think they are used to that.
Skittles
(159,374 posts)yup
Irish_Dem
(57,591 posts)BoRaGard
(2,851 posts)gab13by13
(25,267 posts)In 2 years Congress will be toothless, it is in the works now. TSF will rule by EO's.
OnionPatch
(6,220 posts)That Trump is only going to weed out all the "cheaters" and "grifters" and those who "take advantage" of programs. So they don't think any of this will affect them.
Six117
(226 posts)Deep sigh
TheKentuckian
(26,253 posts)Skittles
(159,374 posts)these fucking repukes make me SICK
ck4829
(35,911 posts)NotHardly
(1,181 posts)Skittles
(159,374 posts)it is crazy, how clueless they are
AKwannabe
(6,357 posts)Everyone is fine.
Medicare is a multi trillion dollar industry
Think about it
AND the boomer voting block would go bonkers over MediCARE cuts.
Every thing is fine. People have their Medicare, industry has its trillions and the poor can get fucked.
ShazzieB
(18,675 posts)If you really believe that people on Medicare and "the poor" are two completely separate groups with no overlap, you are sadly mistaken. There is plenty of overlap.
Eligibility for Medicare is based on age, not income. Seniors are all over the map, economically speaking, and it's grossly inaccurate to speak of Medicare recipients, seniors, or "boomers" as if we are all uniformly well off financially.
Some seniors are very wealthy or at least reasonably comfortable, but many others are living below the poverty line. A lot more of us are somewhere in between, scraping by as best we can on our fixed incomes.
Medicare is literally keeping a lot of us alive, because we require medical care, prescriptions, insulin, etc., that we would not be able to afford on our own. Only the wealthiest seniors will be able to pay for all of that out of their own pockets if Medicare is ever yanked away from us.
Please do not ever, EVER assume that all seniors are comfortably off financially or that we don't desperately need our Medicare benefits.
AKwannabe
(6,357 posts)I said everything was fine because MediCARE is not on the chopping block.
Dont put words on me I dont write.
ShazzieB
(18,675 posts)I directly quoted your words: "People have their Medicare, industry has its trillions and the poor can get fucked."
Whether you meant to or not, that statement seems to be listing three separate groups: people with Medicare, industry, and the poor. I simply pointed out that there's a lot of overlap between the first group and the third.
I'm sorry for the misunderstanding, but it was an honest one on my part. I see now that I should have asked you to clarify what you meant before responding. I apologize for that. I let myself get triggered by a statement that I read as implying that all seniors are well off and may not really need Medicare the way "poor" people need Medicaid. As a senior who is getting by, but just barely, those would be fighting words to me, if that was what you actually meant. I should have asked first before reacting, and for that, I apologize.