General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe only thing I can see that is a possible positive
regarding a terrible criminal act of murder
is that the dialog has changed. Today, there are discussions about the disparity of healthcare costs
anthem blue shield has reversed their decision about limiting anesthesia treatments
Peoples horror stories about medical bankruptcy are being heard.
I am sorry that someone had to die to for all the other deaths from a thousand paper cuts to be exposed.
This is the first hope that I have experienced in weeks.
I think you're correct.
magicarpet
(17,224 posts)They did not conceive that eventually it would cause blowback in our society ?
Irish_Dem
(60,754 posts)It is legal for the greedy billionaires to kill, maim, torture, cause injury and pain, scam, lie and cheat.
And draconian laws for the rest of us.
It is now a crime to save the lives of dying women.
The SC is corrupt and lawless as well.
Chickens coming home to roost.
DontBelieveEastisEas
(1,208 posts)It is not, "legal for the greedy billionaires to ... torture".
Using money as a punishment is the ultimate disparity under the law. It virtually does put rich people, of all colors, above the law.
Irish_Dem
(60,754 posts)Where you see the billionaire insurance companies torture Americans to death.
Refuse medication, surgery, treatment so they die a horrible and painful death.
Or teenagers denied mental health care and end up killing themselves.
We witnessed a career criminal commit crimes right on TV.
We saw his trials, witnesses and evidence.
Not only are all charges dropped but he is allowed to scam his way into the WH
and install a criminal cabal to lead the country.
Sure we have rule of law. NOT.
DontBelieveEastisEas
(1,208 posts)All countries refuse medication, surgery, treatment; there just are not enough resources to put 100% effort into all treatments.
You could say, that by not investing trillions in cancer research, we are allowing millions to have much greater suffering in the future.
Farmer-Rick
(11,584 posts)In most universal healthcare systems, there is a process where the sickest get priority treatment. Triage is the process of prioritizing patients for care based on the urgency of their needs. Certain not health related niche medicine may be denied in some countries, like facelifts for age or by-pass surgery for weight loss.
It's not as if a national healthcare system decides to implement a badly designed AI system where 90% of initially denied medical services are eventually approved. This is done in an effort to aggravate the sick and dying, making them less likely to appeal and save money.
It's not as if single payer systems routinely deny preexisting conditions or decide that surgeries that go too long will be done without anesthesia all to simply save money.
There is a direct path of cause and effect between what the CEO of a healthcare insurance corporation does and the death, permeant injury or suffering of one of their customers who pay them to provide medical care. While the cause and effect between a scientist not getting funding to do research on cancer and a person dying of that cancer is far from direct.
DontBelieveEastisEas
(1,208 posts)I believe that 10% increase of chances is necessary. I think all countries deny that.
State the country that you want to use as an example of one that doesn't deny a medically necessary need.
And I will argue that the latest and greatest treatment, the kind that a person like Steve Jobs would get, is not provided by that country.
State your example country so that I can go to work to try to prove my point.
alterfurz
(2,570 posts)...which, if anything small and weak falls into them they ensnare it, but the large and powerful break through and escape." -- Solon, ca. 600 B.C.E.
Same as it ever was, only now even more blatant.
The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich and the poor alike to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread. Anatole France
Irish_Dem
(60,754 posts)Skittles
(160,690 posts)you know things are getting dire
GenThePerservering
(2,675 posts)give it a rest.
Skittles
(160,690 posts)people are savoring a STREET EXECUTION......suddenly gun violence is POPULAR!
TBF
(34,841 posts)why are you disparaging so many on DU?
I thought the OP put it really well. From what I saw yesterday most people were astonished with the murder of Scott Thompson. It definitely has sparked needed conversation, but no one asked for this event to happen, esp. on DU.
Skittles
(160,690 posts)that excusing street executions for any reason is NOT a good idea (replying to magiccarpet)
there is nothing RUDE about that
OVER AND OUT
TBF
(34,841 posts)"when even so-called progressives are A-OK with executing people on the street you know things are getting dire"
you weren't referring to progressives on DU?
womanofthehills
(9,381 posts)52,000,000 covered by UHC
32% claims denied
He made 20,000,000 a yr - company way over made 389 billion last yr.
His company denied people inhalers, mammograms, surgery, meds etc etc - people hate that company.
Many say their loved ones died because of treatment denied.
Now people feel sorry for the killer and hope hes never found. This says a lot about our healthcare. It sucks!
magicarpet
(17,224 posts)... saying his rampant denyal of coverage brought the shooting upon himself.
Comment section was shutdown.
■○■○■○■○■○■○
Moderators Delete Reddit Thread as Doctors Torch Dead UnitedHealthcare CEO
Doctors in one of the Internets top medical communities have turned on the murdered UnitedHealthcare (UHC) CEO Brian Thompson in such brutal fashion that Reddit moderators deleted a thread on the killing.
The moderators of r/medicine closed the thread, posted Wednesday after news broke that Thompson was shot dead outside the New York Hilton hotel in Midtown Manhattan, after it racked up over 500 replies.
The commenters overwhelmingly criticizedand satirizedthe insurers alleged denial of coverage to sick and dying Americans in order to juice profits.
The top comment, which received hundreds of supporting upvotes from other users, mocked UHCs notorious track record for refusing to pay out insurance claims and is written as a lengthy, spoof rejection letter from the company.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/medical-subreddit-deletes-thread-unitedhealthcare-155829903.html
Skittles
(160,690 posts)condoning street executions is entirely another
magicarpet
(17,224 posts).... gun violence and lawlessness gift wrapped in the Fascist package of the Nazi Orange Menace all brought us here to this blazing inferno point.
Nobody anticipated gun violence blowback ?
Here we are,... our nightmares are about to come to fruition. American Democracy about to be stomped out, the parade of Christo-Fascist Nationalism - American Nazi Republican Party will begin as the new substitute and permenent replacement for our brand of governance.
Project 2025 - Nazi Manifesto will usher in our new tomorrows.
Skittles
(160,690 posts)it is just so very disturbing
womanofthehills
(9,381 posts)They wanted him to suffer like their loved ones denied care by his company suffered.
After Blue Shield said yesterday that they would not pay for anesthesia if an operation went too long - people posted online the photo of the woman running the company. The company reversed their new policy fast. Sad it had to get to this but if our gov wont provide national healthcare- they need to review the policies of these evil companies.
ancianita
(39,033 posts)at least under Biden.
It's a rich CEO of the biggest healthcare (that profits from denied health or care coverage) system in the nation.
Only then do corporate allies call it murder when one of them is killed for the deaths they've worked to profit from.
Only then is one particular CEO's killing treated a national "moral" scandal.
Many of us hope they prosecute the killer to the fullest extent of the law.
Many of us also know that CEO had it coming to him.
Response to UpInArms (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Skittles
(160,690 posts)yes indeed
Meowmee
(6,473 posts)I dont think its going to change much though. Hopefully Im wrong. Especially not with the new reign of terror taking over soon. I consider what is done with healthcare denial to be murder also in many cases. Still do not approve of his demise but if it was the cause of the motive for murdering him, I could understand why that person felt that way.
ForgedCrank
(2,447 posts)that only lawmakers could even do anything about it, and they are in on the whole thing
Sailingdiver
(191 posts)Cited "massive misinformation" as the cause.
Fuck them.
tenderfoot
(8,918 posts)They'll make it about the patient and how they should have taken better care of themselves.