Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

erodriguez

(749 posts)
Mon Dec 9, 2024, 07:15 AM Dec 9

The media is targeting US birthright citizenship

Trump has vowed to subvert the constitution and deport Americans and strip them of their citizenship.

The media has decided to frame this in the terms that white nationalist Trump wants. Their are headlines saying "Trump to end birthright Citizenship." Quoting Trump saying "it's got to end' as if he is reasonable. They are running articles pointing out the Trump family hypocrisy that they used birthright citizenship.

FUCK THAT.

They need to state is as I put it above.

Trump to deport Americans and strip them of their citizenship.


60 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The media is targeting US birthright citizenship (Original Post) erodriguez Dec 9 OP
What the SC decides on this on this will be a good indicator just how quickly our Democracy will be destroyed. That the JohnSJ Dec 9 #1
Fuck the willing sheep. What is our best course of resistance? Magoo48 Dec 9 #38
So far I am not particularly impressed by some of the Democrats in Congress who seem too willing to NOT to fight. JohnSJ Dec 9 #40
trump said recently he "would TRY to end it." Someone must have told him a Constitutional Silent Type Dec 9 #2
I don't think he cares. In his fluffy little poo-brain, AllyCat Dec 9 #14
Supremes won't give him a chance to violate what is explicitly written in Constitution. Not Silent Type Dec 9 #15
I wish I had your optimism. AllyCat Dec 9 #19
Supremes can insist they are 'originalists', and thus all Ammendments.... 70sEraVet Dec 9 #24
They COULD, but highly unlikely they will. Silent Type Dec 9 #26
All except the 2nd, of course. Aristus Dec 9 #58
The "Supremes" aren't going to do shit against Trump. TBF Dec 9 #35
I don't think the media should report anything. Trump says. Chances are very, very good. It's a lie. Walleye Dec 9 #3
Is the intention just denaturalization BadgerKid Dec 9 #4
No the intent is to deport the American children of the undocumented erodriguez Dec 9 #5
Their plan is to end the "anchor babies" dilemma FakeNoose Dec 9 #12
Lately he's been implying that the undocumented family members either leave - haele Dec 9 #34
Is he going to start with his own family? nt TBF Dec 9 #36
Let's Talk About All of Those Russian Kids Deep State Witch Dec 9 #48
Yes it's definitely abusing our system, and the Russians are doing it blatantly FakeNoose Dec 9 #51
The thing that is totally shocking, is that everyone assumes he means it's only going to apply to Baitball Blogger Dec 9 #6
My Friend's partner is Ukrainian Deep State Witch Dec 9 #49
Our government's Constitution stopped working for us, the day that less than 50% of those who voted, voted Baitball Blogger Dec 9 #50
The media... 2naSalit Dec 9 #7
the media continues to traumatize us with this sort of inflammatory BS LymphocyteLover Dec 9 #8
On day 1 Beachnutt Dec 9 #9
C-SPAN Washington Journal is talking about this now. Emile Dec 9 #10
We already did that. Research the "Real Jobs for Real Americans" Act AZLD4Candidate Dec 9 #11
Really? I'm surprised but thank you NT Tickle Dec 9 #17
I did look that up. 70sEraVet Dec 9 #32
Thank you, 70sEraVet, for the link FemDemERA Dec 9 #53
They are targeting the Constitution dlk Dec 9 #13
tsf also employs crews of undocumented folks, why isn't he arrested and they get deported? lark Dec 9 #16
he has also had many of those 'birth tourists' stay at his properties. mopinko Dec 9 #29
If they get rid of the birthright citizenship. The people without it should not have to pay into Social Security LiberalArkie Dec 9 #18
Everyone pays into SS and Medicare if they work for a legitimate business LittleGirl Dec 9 #21
I have been fighting a mostly lonely battle for many years. DFW Dec 9 #37
We really get the axe from being citizens abroad. LittleGirl Dec 9 #42
I started working full time with my outfit in 1975, and didn't formalize my residence move here until 2011 DFW Dec 9 #56
That mess is why I'm glad my spouse handles all of our retirement accounts LittleGirl Dec 9 #57
Alemannic is a challenge alright DFW Dec 9 #59
Oh I totally agree. I just have a problem with the fact that a person is forced to pay into something that they will LiberalArkie Dec 9 #43
A lot of folks think it will impact someone else IronLionZion Dec 9 #20
It's just s diversion Jughead Dec 9 #22
It's all about the Bitcoins. Chris Hayes had it right. k55f5r Dec 9 #39
No no. It going to happen and they are going to rob America erodriguez Dec 9 #44
this Cosmocat Dec 9 #46
Fine, Donnie can start with all the white folks first Blue_Tires Dec 9 #23
How about the constutution VGuerra276 Dec 9 #25
he'd like to repeal all of the 14th amend. mopinko Dec 9 #31
He can't just repeal a amendment. Elessar Zappa Dec 9 #52
oh, i know. but mopinko Dec 9 #55
Media has no birth certificate, they are not people, they are corporations. bucolic_frolic Dec 9 #27
Media once again obeying Trump in advance. nt Jit423 Dec 9 #28
More projection and hypocrisy. Russian 'birth tourism' -- according to The Week, at Trump condos lostnfound Dec 9 #30
So Melanie and her anchor baby. onecaliberal Dec 9 #33
No, they're white. They can stay. JustABozoOnThisBus Dec 9 #41
All those brown people pissed at the white immigrants are not gonna be happy. onecaliberal Dec 9 #45
Agolf Twitler wants to repeal the 14th amendment because he wants to avoid prosecution for January 6th. love_katz Dec 9 #47
"The Media" is now synonymous with "The Ruling Class" Johnny2X2X Dec 9 #54
Wait till they go after Caesarian births. usonian Dec 9 #60

JohnSJ

(96,812 posts)
1. What the SC decides on this on this will be a good indicator just how quickly our Democracy will be destroyed. That the
Mon Dec 9, 2024, 07:20 AM
Dec 9

executive branch wants to take-over the job that lies in the legislature where amendments to the constitution can get repealed, is the path to autocracy, and the willing sheep that make up this country allowed this to happen is a disgrace.



JohnSJ

(96,812 posts)
40. So far I am not particularly impressed by some of the Democrats in Congress who seem too willing to NOT to fight.
Mon Dec 9, 2024, 10:06 AM
Dec 9

Silent Type

(7,327 posts)
2. trump said recently he "would TRY to end it." Someone must have told him a Constitutional
Mon Dec 9, 2024, 07:24 AM
Dec 9

Amendment is required.

AllyCat

(17,221 posts)
14. I don't think he cares. In his fluffy little poo-brain,
Mon Dec 9, 2024, 08:44 AM
Dec 9

He thinks he is the law. He is going to do what he wants, SCROTUS, will say he can, and our MAGA congress will cower before him and Muskmelon.

He doesn’t care about the constitution, amendments, or law.

Silent Type

(7,327 posts)
15. Supremes won't give him a chance to violate what is explicitly written in Constitution. Not
Mon Dec 9, 2024, 08:46 AM
Dec 9

much room for interpretation on this one.

AllyCat

(17,221 posts)
19. I wish I had your optimism.
Mon Dec 9, 2024, 08:53 AM
Dec 9

Supremes have already shown they don’t care. And that he can do whatever he wants.

70sEraVet

(4,238 posts)
24. Supremes can insist they are 'originalists', and thus all Ammendments....
Mon Dec 9, 2024, 09:03 AM
Dec 9

are suspect. They would happily return us to a time when only white, land owning men could vote.

Aristus

(68,618 posts)
58. All except the 2nd, of course.
Mon Dec 9, 2024, 04:35 PM
Dec 9

SCOTUS right-wingers DO love their vacations on gun manufacturers' yachts, I bet...

TBF

(34,748 posts)
35. The "Supremes" aren't going to do shit against Trump.
Mon Dec 9, 2024, 09:38 AM
Dec 9

They have made that abundantly clear.

Walleye

(36,422 posts)
3. I don't think the media should report anything. Trump says. Chances are very, very good. It's a lie.
Mon Dec 9, 2024, 07:24 AM
Dec 9

So they think that’s their job now to just repeat Trump’s lies?

BadgerKid

(4,700 posts)
4. Is the intention just denaturalization
Mon Dec 9, 2024, 07:28 AM
Dec 9

Of immigrants? Otherwise i believe the 4th Amendment protects against deporting US-born citizens.
I feel there’s a sort of irony in that he claims, in effect, that immigrants cause crime, yet there is no talk about deporting J6 perpetrators.

FakeNoose

(36,005 posts)
12. Their plan is to end the "anchor babies" dilemma
Mon Dec 9, 2024, 08:23 AM
Dec 9

When a family of undocumented immigrants gets into the country, and they manage to have one baby on American soil, THAT baby is given American citizenship.

Prior to the presidency of Chump, those entire families were allowed to stay in the US as a means of keeping families together. Now that's no longer the case, the families are being split up without regard to their rights. The next step in Chump's evil plan is to deny the citizenship of the "anchor babies." We'll see how far he gets with this.

haele

(13,648 posts)
34. Lately he's been implying that the undocumented family members either leave -
Mon Dec 9, 2024, 09:30 AM
Dec 9

Or the whole family goes.
Some of his ramblings have indicated that he's been informed that separating young children from undocumented parents is a really bad look, especially since there are still young children missing from the last family border separation move and rumors that some supporters of his administration involved with contracts to care for those children and "lost track" might have been profiting from adoption services for them -i.e., human trafficking.
Sorry for the convoluted sentence.

Haele

Deep State Witch

(11,355 posts)
48. Let's Talk About All of Those Russian Kids
Mon Dec 9, 2024, 12:06 PM
Dec 9

Let's start by revoking the US citizenship of all of those children from Russian women who fly to the US to give birth. They usually stay in the Miami area, especially at Trump-owned properties. They give birth in US hospitals, so the kids are automatically US citizens. I'd rather revoke them then the children of hardworking Hispanic immigrants.

FakeNoose

(36,005 posts)
51. Yes it's definitely abusing our system, and the Russians are doing it blatantly
Mon Dec 9, 2024, 01:47 PM
Dec 9

However they are far from the only ones who are doing it.

We need a "holding tank" area where immigrants can be held outside the country while their paperwork and citizenship is being researched. I'm not talking about a prison - I mean something like Ellis Island of the 19th Century. The immigrants must be held separate while their paperwork is being researched. Once they get into the country, they disappear immediately with relatives and friends helping them.

Baitball Blogger

(48,431 posts)
6. The thing that is totally shocking, is that everyone assumes he means it's only going to apply to
Mon Dec 9, 2024, 07:45 AM
Dec 9

those with latino American heritage. That's the true sign of racism. And I guess the Latino Americans who voted for Trump are too stupid to realize that they missed an opportunity to stand together to end this nonsense.

Deep State Witch

(11,355 posts)
49. My Friend's partner is Ukrainian
Mon Dec 9, 2024, 12:07 PM
Dec 9

He's a naturalized citizen who emigrated from Ukraine. She's very worried that his citizenship will be revoked.

Baitball Blogger

(48,431 posts)
50. Our government's Constitution stopped working for us, the day that less than 50% of those who voted, voted
Mon Dec 9, 2024, 12:09 PM
Dec 9

for a felon who had no respect for the Constitution.

AZLD4Candidate

(6,374 posts)
11. We already did that. Research the "Real Jobs for Real Americans" Act
Mon Dec 9, 2024, 08:13 AM
Dec 9

Hoover deported over a million naturalized citizens.

dlk

(12,468 posts)
13. They are targeting the Constitution
Mon Dec 9, 2024, 08:43 AM
Dec 9

This is how far they have fallen into the hands of our enemies.

lark

(24,343 posts)
16. tsf also employs crews of undocumented folks, why isn't he arrested and they get deported?
Mon Dec 9, 2024, 08:47 AM
Dec 9

Oh yeah, rules and laws are only for the working class/poor - the rich are above the law if they aren't Democrats.

mopinko

(71,964 posts)
29. he has also had many of those 'birth tourists' stay at his properties.
Mon Dec 9, 2024, 09:13 AM
Dec 9

remember a story in his 1st term about wealthy russians doing this.
it is a thing. i had some tenants from nigeria, and they got paid a few k to let others stay w them to have a baby. twice.

LiberalArkie

(16,658 posts)
18. If they get rid of the birthright citizenship. The people without it should not have to pay into Social Security
Mon Dec 9, 2024, 08:48 AM
Dec 9

or Medicare as they will not be able to use it. This would create a massive pool of employees that the employers do not have to match the Social Security withholding or the Medicare.

LittleGirl

(8,499 posts)
21. Everyone pays into SS and Medicare if they work for a legitimate business
Mon Dec 9, 2024, 08:58 AM
Dec 9

Why shouldn't they get that money back? I'm sorry but maybe you don't understand that you have to work at least 40 quarters in the US to get SS and Medicare paid back to you. Otherwise, it's gone. My husband is naturalized and he has not worked the 40 quarters yet. He pays a high percentage of his income in taxes and to say he shouldn't quality for those benefits is unfair. Not only that but for the past decade, we've had to file our taxes from abroad and received no benefit from those tax payments from foreign income. No highway usage, no kids in schools, etc. It doesn't matter where you live in the world, the US is the only country in the world that makes you report your income when you don't live in the country. How about ending that b.s. that only hurts the working stiffs in the world and not the billionaires.

DFW

(56,896 posts)
37. I have been fighting a mostly lonely battle for many years.
Mon Dec 9, 2024, 09:48 AM
Dec 9

The USA and Eritrea are the only two countries in the world that do not recognize residence-based taxation.

The Democrats Abroad are fighting for it, too, but getting nowhere, like me. Any American like me whose job is US-based, but whose residence is abroad usually gets doubly hosed. In addition to full German taxes, for example, I pay US taxes as well. My SS is taxed higher in Germany than it would be in the USA, and muchnof my US income that is taxed in the USA is taxed again in Germany. The Germans want to tax my Roth IRA again, too.

LittleGirl

(8,499 posts)
42. We really get the axe from being citizens abroad.
Mon Dec 9, 2024, 10:15 AM
Dec 9

Considering me a traitor for not living in the US (I moved back this year) just sticks it too. I've followed you for a while DFW. I respect your service to our country and the amazing ability you have at languages. I lived in Germany for nearly 3 years (2007-2009) and Switzerland from 2014-2024. In between is when we lived in the states and he almost got the 40 quarters but not quite yet.

DFW

(56,896 posts)
56. I started working full time with my outfit in 1975, and didn't formalize my residence move here until 2011
Mon Dec 9, 2024, 03:06 PM
Dec 9

So, I have put in my time in the States. At least I get something for all those U.S. taxes I paid in, even if Germany gets to take half of it. On that small matter, at least, Germany and the USA are in agreement--the country of residence taxes the Social Security payout (of course, I'm still paying in $10,000 a year, too. It sucks that Germany gets to take 50%´of my benefit, where the USA would be taking 85% of 39.6% (or whatever the max rate is in the USA these days). But at least they aren't trying to take over 70%, which, between the two countries, they are trying to take from most of my current income. Plus, when I made my Roth IRA conversion, I paid the full U.S. tax due on the full value at the time, following the rules to the letter. Under US law, that meant that, after the conversion, if the value went down, too bad for me, I couldn't take a deduction, but if the value went up, then good for me, since the government says the same rules apply: they consider whatever it's worth as tax paid in full. I made the conversion when the Dow was 7800 (Cheney-Bush recession). Obviously, at today's 44000+, the value of the Roth IRA has gone way up. The two governments just have different attitudes toward the Roth IRA. The USA says, "you paid your taxes in full, whatever it's worth now is yours." Germany says "we don't care what the USA or the Double Taxation Treaty says, we will take half of any distribution you take out."

I made the Roth conversion when I was still a full time US resident, so the Germans have no claim on my Roth IRA. Except they say, well, we want half of that, too. I'll forego whatever fun I might have had with that money and leave it to my daughters and grandchildren before I leave it to a bunch of German bureaucrats who, besides giving me NOTHING in return, will only use it to pay for their chauffeur-driven limousines and six week paid vacations. They said they will only tax any distributions when I take them out of it, which have, of course, been zero. Luckily, since I'm still working, I don't need any of it to live on. I consulted a German international tax specialist about the Roth IRA, and he suggested I move back to the USA for a year and a day, so I can take the payout and the Germans would have no claim on it. But I would go nuts if I had to spend a full year (or even most of it) back in the states, when my life and my job is here. At age 32, that might have been considered a sabbatical. At age 72, that would reek of retirement, something I am not yet prepared to do.

Where did you live in Switzerland? I was just down there for a few hours today, meeting with the guy from my office there. He has been with me since 1984. I can hardly believe it. He was 37 then. He's 77 now. But like me, he doesn't see any sense in retiring and sitting around doing nothing all day. He inherited the house he lives in, which is within the city of Geneva, from his dad. He could never have bought it outright, Swiss real estate prices being what they are. But he has no financial worries. Like me he is only terrified of boredom. We met up in Zürich today, since the only flight from Geneva back to Düsseldorf is currently at 9:00 AM, which would have given me the time to step off the plane from Düsseldorf, say hi, and turn right around and hope the security line wouldn't make me miss the flight. Luckily, he thought nothing of making the three hour drive from Geneva to Zürich, and then the three hours back. But since I had to get up at 4:15 in the morning to make the early flight from Düsseldorf to Zürich, I had nothing to laugh about, either.

LittleGirl

(8,499 posts)
57. That mess is why I'm glad my spouse handles all of our retirement accounts
Mon Dec 9, 2024, 04:33 PM
Dec 9

In the UK, DE, CH and US. He has spreadsheets. We lived just outside of Basel. In Germany we were near Stuttgart. I was there last week. My spouse’s CH residency permit expired and they wanted all of our biological data again. Photo, signature and thumb print which was new this time. We’re good until 2029. We have a property there we’re going to rent until we sell in 2028. Biggest mistake buying that place. I don’t miss it. I just couldn’t learn the language. I begged to come back here.

DFW

(56,896 posts)
59. Alemannic is a challenge alright
Mon Dec 9, 2024, 05:02 PM
Dec 9

Otherwise known as "Schwyzerdüütsch." I'm OK with Basel or Zürich dialects. Get out in the hinterlands like Bern or Interlaken, and it gets harder for me. Get out to Chur, Appenzell or Uri, and I start to cry for help, too. Even my colleague from Geneva threw in the towel long ago. He's OK with English or Italian, but Schwyzerdüütch might as well be Uzbek to him.

I have only one retirement setup. I have the Roth IRA and a 401k which I can't access until I stop working. If I stop working, I figure I'm dead within a year, and won't be able to enjoy much of anything I take out of that 401k anyhow. That's relatively small to begin with. It's different if you have two million dollars in there. I don't, unfortunately. Other than the Roth IRA and the 401k, I have a jumble of some stock, some gold coins, and a savings account back in Dallas. I also have tiny sliver of my company which is frozen colder than Greenland's last surviving glaciers until the company is sold, which I probably won't live to see. If I do, then I can afford--what? No mansions in Beverly Hills, no private planes, so, what, then? I'd probably invest in a private recording studio and make music, or something. Maybe commute to Atlanta and play on more sessions with The Freedom Toast? I briefly fantasized about a house on Cape Cod. My sensible wife stopped that one cold. "A house we won't see for eleven months out of the year, but have to pay taxes on 12 months out of the year, pay for upkeep and renovation, and might fall into the ocean if the winter storms get too violent. Are you out of your mind?" Well, I may well be that, but I have been cured of looking to buy a house on Cape Cod. We'll just keep on keepin' on. It's worked out for us so far, anyway.

LiberalArkie

(16,658 posts)
43. Oh I totally agree. I just have a problem with the fact that a person is forced to pay into something that they will
Mon Dec 9, 2024, 10:26 AM
Dec 9

never benefit from it.

IronLionZion

(47,120 posts)
20. A lot of folks think it will impact someone else
Mon Dec 9, 2024, 08:57 AM
Dec 9

way too many people don't think they'll be impacted.

Jughead

(48 posts)
22. It's just s diversion
Mon Dec 9, 2024, 09:00 AM
Dec 9

This immigrant deportation is all just a big diversion so meanwhile Trumps swamp creatures can rob America blind.

k55f5r

(458 posts)
39. It's all about the Bitcoins. Chris Hayes had it right.
Mon Dec 9, 2024, 10:03 AM
Dec 9

we are going to sit back and watch the most venal, corrupt villain ever to come near the WH steal our treasure.
The country will be bankrupt like any other Rtump business.
And the republicants will be crying on Fux how it's all the Demonrats Fault and start a campaign to burn liberals at the stake.
The night that donnie dicko was first enshrined in 2016, my wife said "It's a good time to be white"
And now It's a good time to be White and a Male.

VGuerra276

(55 posts)
25. How about the constutution
Mon Dec 9, 2024, 09:04 AM
Dec 9

The 14th amendment guarantees birthright citizenship. How does he intend to get around that? And why isn't the media talking about it?

Elessar Zappa

(16,078 posts)
52. He can't just repeal a amendment.
Mon Dec 9, 2024, 01:50 PM
Dec 9

It’s a huge process that won’t get past the beginning stages.

onecaliberal

(36,328 posts)
45. All those brown people pissed at the white immigrants are not gonna be happy.
Mon Dec 9, 2024, 10:42 AM
Dec 9

This is why they voted for the convicted felon child rapist.

love_katz

(2,870 posts)
47. Agolf Twitler wants to repeal the 14th amendment because he wants to avoid prosecution for January 6th.
Mon Dec 9, 2024, 11:52 AM
Dec 9

Not saying that the racist phuck isn't doing it to hurt brown people and give a thrill to his vile base.
However, the amendment contains some crucial language about how persons who "have engaged in insurrection against the United States ", or have provided " aid and comfort " to those who have done those things, that person is not eligible to run for nor occupy the offices of President and Vice President of the United States.

He is trying to make sure that the courts can never prosecute him for January 6th.

Johnny2X2X

(21,882 posts)
54. "The Media" is now synonymous with "The Ruling Class"
Mon Dec 9, 2024, 02:33 PM
Dec 9

I think it's something the resistance can shift the narrative with.

We have rulers in this country, they installed Donald Trump into power. Trump is the leader of the ruling class and he's appointed other members of the ruling class to help run our government not for the benefit of the people, but for their own benefit.

The idea that the media is separate from the ruling class is what's got to go. The media is owned by billionaires and they control what we are presented. The differing view points are really just to give an illusion that there are sides to the media when really the media is just dpoing the bidding of the ruling class in different ways. The media isn't screwing up by normalizing Trump, they're doing exactly what the ruling class told them to do.

So the ruling class has decided to normalize doing away with birthright citizenship, probably as a way to distract us from something else that is worse.

usonian

(14,608 posts)
60. Wait till they go after Caesarian births.
Mon Dec 9, 2024, 10:27 PM
Dec 9

Just to make you forget about "birthright".

Do I get to choose which country? I've got languages to learn.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The media is targeting US...