Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRaw Story: 'At his behest': MSNBC's Lemire warns Trump's already issued orders for vow he now denies
Raw Story - 'At his behest': MSNBC's Lemire warns Trump's already issued orders for vow he now denies
Tom Boggioni
December 9, 2024 7:55AM ET
On MSNBC's "Morning Joe" Monday, co-host Jonathan Lemire was more than a little skeptical of Donald Trump's claim in an NBC interview that he will not use the Department of Justice to pursue his political enemies.
Speaking with NBC's Kristen Welker, the president-elect was pressed, "You wrote on Truth Social in 2023 that youre going to appoint a real special prosecutor to go after Joe Biden. Now youre saying youre not going to do that."
"I will say this, no, Im not doing that unless I find something that I think is reasonable, but thats not going to be my decision," he replied. "Thats going to be [attorney general nominee] Pam Bondis decision, and, to a different extent, [FBI director nominee] Kash Patel, assuming theyre both there, and I think theyre both going to get approved. But I I you know, while you ask me that, what theyve done to me with weaponization is a disgrace."
According to Lemire, Trump is playing games and indulging in "plausible deniability."
"This idea, he said, I would not direct people under me to carry out these arrests or target my political opponents," Lemire told the panel. "That's giving him some plausible deniability."
"Maybe he won't come January 21st, say 'Hey, arrest Liz Cheney,' he's already directed it," he explained. "He has said these names over and over and over for months. They already can take their cues; That would be at his behest were this to happen."
/snip
Tom Boggioni
December 9, 2024 7:55AM ET
On MSNBC's "Morning Joe" Monday, co-host Jonathan Lemire was more than a little skeptical of Donald Trump's claim in an NBC interview that he will not use the Department of Justice to pursue his political enemies.
Speaking with NBC's Kristen Welker, the president-elect was pressed, "You wrote on Truth Social in 2023 that youre going to appoint a real special prosecutor to go after Joe Biden. Now youre saying youre not going to do that."
"I will say this, no, Im not doing that unless I find something that I think is reasonable, but thats not going to be my decision," he replied. "Thats going to be [attorney general nominee] Pam Bondis decision, and, to a different extent, [FBI director nominee] Kash Patel, assuming theyre both there, and I think theyre both going to get approved. But I I you know, while you ask me that, what theyve done to me with weaponization is a disgrace."
According to Lemire, Trump is playing games and indulging in "plausible deniability."
"This idea, he said, I would not direct people under me to carry out these arrests or target my political opponents," Lemire told the panel. "That's giving him some plausible deniability."
"Maybe he won't come January 21st, say 'Hey, arrest Liz Cheney,' he's already directed it," he explained. "He has said these names over and over and over for months. They already can take their cues; That would be at his behest were this to happen."
/snip
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Raw Story: 'At his behest': MSNBC's Lemire warns Trump's already issued orders for vow he now denies (Original Post)
Dennis Donovan
Dec 9
OP
Make no mistake: No matter how he uses "weasel" words, he's loaded for bear. That's
allegorical oracle
Dec 9
#2
Walleye
(36,390 posts)1. Pam's decision, huh, he owns Pam. Remember, he speaks in code.
allegorical oracle
(3,393 posts)2. Make no mistake: No matter how he uses "weasel" words, he's loaded for bear. That's
why he's front-loading the administrative shotgun with sidekicks who are as furious as he is.
It's puzzling, though, whether he truly believes he is an innocent in all the charges against him, or if he's truly as mentally deranged as he appears. To continue to deny any culpability for any of his illegal activities is mind-boggling. Only explanation is that he's following through on dismantling the entire government establishment.