General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWould the GOP expand SCOTUS?
I saw a few weeks ago that a GOP congressman was looking to revive a formerly attempted Democratic bill that would expand the courts. Considering the current SCOTUS has signalled being less than lukewarm about Trump's proposals, how likely is it that the GOP and Trump will expand the court so they can get more friendly justices? Thinking a Justice Rick Scott, Ted Cruz, Lauren Boebert?
RockRaven
(16,537 posts)the lower courts and appellate courts.
zorbasd
(264 posts)fascists for the retiring fascist pissants, Thomas and Alito.
ColinC
(10,952 posts)That would take Roberts, Coney Barrett and Kavanaugh getting replaced. Which isn't happening.
Ocelot II
(121,502 posts)ColinC
(10,952 posts)Such as literally replacing Trump with the constitution (let's not forget that was a stated goal in his campaign), expanding the supreme court might be necessary.
Runningdawg
(4,630 posts)He wants NO ONE above him. He keeps telling people that and they laugh.
Groundhawg
(1,004 posts)onenote
(44,805 posts)And I don't think they have the votes to get rid of the filibuster.
But one thing seems clear: the "neutral" arguments that some have made for expanding the court -- such as adding justices to match the number of circuit courts -- are just a cover. We're for it when a Democratic president could fill the additional positions and against it when its not a Democratic president. Which is fine, by the way.