General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe US is striking targets across Syria, and it isn't the only one dropping bombs in this uncertain moment
The US military has carried out extensive airstrikes in Syria since the Assad regime collapsed over the weekend, and it's not the only country on the hunt for targets in this uncertain moment.
American, Israeli, and Turkish forces have all been involved in bombing targets across Syria over the past few days in actions said to be in support of their respective national security interests.
For the US, this means continuing to go after the Islamic State, as it has done for years, but with an intensity to keep the group at bay. The Biden administration has stated that this mission will continue despite uncertainty about the future of Syria's leadership.
The US has repeatedly said that it is committed to the enduring defeat of ISIS. "We don't want to give ISIS an opportunity to exploit what's going on," White House National Security Council spokesperson John Kirby told reporters on Tuesday, adding, "They love nothing more than ungoverned space."
https://www.yahoo.com/news/us-bombing-targets-across-syria-224825529.html
speak easy
(10,701 posts)Jit423
(429 posts)What assets do we have in Syria? this is just more softening of the ground for Israeli occupation. Wait for it. The PNAC wet dream comes to a successful end.
peregrinus
(409 posts)Wonder where all the Israel lovers will be then
kelly1mm
(5,413 posts)now Syria. Winners thus far seem to be Israel and Turkey.
maxsolomon
(35,358 posts)Is that what you're contending?
Hekate
(95,287 posts)canuckledragger
(1,992 posts)Last edited Wed Dec 11, 2024, 09:17 PM - Edit history (1)
Hekate
(95,287 posts)canuckledragger
(1,992 posts)Hekate
(95,287 posts)canuckledragger
(1,992 posts)And don't like it when this is specifically pointed out.
Hekate
(95,287 posts)See you around
maxsolomon
(35,358 posts)We're NOT targeting ISIL? We don't have "assets" in Syria? We support the Kurds that hold the NE of the country across the Eurphrates - they're our "assets".
R.e. an Israeli Occupation of Syria: that's absurd. Ridiculous.
AloeVera
(2,010 posts)A clean break from Oslo/Peace, combined with going on the offensive in the region. A key part of the plan was removing Saddam and weakening and even "rolling back" Syria. The goals were to preserve access to oil and helping Israel rid itself of the "Palestinian problem". So here we are.
There is nothing left now to stop the genocide and ethnic cleansing of Palestine. The West won't do it as we've seen.
And Syria and its poor people? They can kiss their current state goodbye, it will be balkanized, divided among "greater powers" and its resources plundered. What is going on now is to ensure that it will never, ever be able to defend itself again or present any military threat to hold Israel's expansionism and brutality towards Palestinians in check.
Beastly Boy
(11,309 posts)Its when ISIS-affiliated rebels topple the most brutal dictator in all of Middle East, ending a 12 year old civil war in Syria, and that dictator flees to Russia while Israel destroys his entire army which Iran no longer finances.
Pay attention now, this is what is called both genocide and ethnic cleansing, and Israel is at fault, naturally.
Nothing is too ridiculous as long as some people get to scream genocide! and Israel in the same sentence
AloeVera
(2,010 posts)Please don't answer.
I said no such thing and you know it.
Why do you continue to twist my words into some absurd, nonsensical accusation having no relation to what I actually said??
Some self-reflection might be in order, though long overdue.
Wish you good luck with that! Too-da-loo!
Beastly Boy
(11,309 posts)ISIS-affiliated rebels toppling the most brutal dictator in all of Middle East, ending a 12 year old civil war in Syria, or Syrias Assad receiving asylum in Russia, or Israel destroying his army, or Iran propping up Assads regime for the twelve years of brutal civil war in Syria, with hundreds of thousands civilian casualties and nearly a million Syrians fleeing the country.
You said no such thing. Not a single word of it. And thats a shame.
The only thing that you managed to take out of these devastating events that involve many diverse parties in a regional geo-political struggle is the usual: a couple of trigger words to get riled about.
BLUCHER!
I mean GENOCIDE! ETHNIC CLEANSING! ISRAEL!
As predictable as it is pathetic.
malaise
(278,777 posts)Im sick of this planet
Blue_Tires
(56,730 posts)we didn't just take out Assad back in 2012 or whatever....
AntiFascist
(12,976 posts)this opinion is obviously based in his Islamophobia. Western media is freely moving about Damascus showing people celebrating and flashing peace signs everywhere.
The US and particularly Israel need to be very careful not to stir up hatred against either, otherwise we may end up with another Islamic state hating us.
C0RI0LANUS
(1,862 posts)Sources:
https://www.centcom.mil/CENTCOM-AOR/Qatar/
https://apnews.com/article/iraq-us-troops-military-withdrawal-iran-a79aa83dca8f776f87a138bfe5697fa3
https://cnreurafcent.cnic.navy.mil/Installations/NSA-Bahrain/
Brenda
(1,355 posts)We can't fucking afford to be "the world's police force" or whatever quaint justification is currently being used.
C0RI0LANUS
(1,862 posts)Last edited Thu Dec 12, 2024, 09:23 AM - Edit history (1)
Indeed, another poll, conducted by the Chicago Council on Global Affairs in February found that a majority of Americans (56%) do not believe that the United States should pick a side in Israels war on Gaza. And a more recent survey from Council this month found that just four in ten support the United States sending troops to defend Israel if attacked by its neighbors.
Source:
https://responsiblestatecraft.org/america-polling-interventionism/
Democrats should heed this message for future elections.