General Discussion

Stardust Mirror

(624 posts) Mon Dec 23, 2024, 03:55 AM Dec 23

Since it's fair to assume almost all of Drumpf's appointment picks are based on bribes..

isn't there some sort of evidence trail that could be used to prosecute him for government-by-bribe?

I mean it's not like he knows anything about the government agencies he's appointing people to head, or the countries he's giving ambassadorships to. Someone has to be screening all the requests to submit bids/bribes to get positions they want. I don't believe anyone on the Drumpf team is researching who is best qualified for any of these positions but I would venture there is a team screening/soliciting bribe bids.

OK those are my crazy thoughts. I'm ready to be corrected and informed.

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Since it's fair to assume almost all of Drumpf's appointment picks are based on bribes.. (Original Post) Stardust Mirror Dec 23 OP

The Roberts Court/SCOTUS says bribes are cool and fine and good. RockRaven Dec 23 #1

Supreme Court gave him immunity and they think bribes are wonderful. Irish_Dem Dec 23 #2

Yes it is pay for play right now. Trump is making good money selling positions in his administration. Irish_Dem Dec 23 #3

RockRaven

(16,577 posts)

1. The Roberts Court/SCOTUS says bribes are cool and fine and good.

Reply to Stardust Mirror (Original post)

Mon Dec 23, 2024, 04:06 AM

Dec 23

Especially when given to Republicans, but also in the general case.

Irish_Dem

(60,016 posts)

2. Supreme Court gave him immunity and they think bribes are wonderful.

Reply to Stardust Mirror (Original post)

Mon Dec 23, 2024, 09:03 AM

Dec 23

Irish_Dem

(60,016 posts)

3. Yes it is pay for play right now. Trump is making good money selling positions in his administration.

Reply to Stardust Mirror (Original post)

Mon Dec 23, 2024, 09:04 AM

Dec 23

Reply to this discussion