General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhere are your political morals? (poll)
Attacking polls is fun too. Greed rules and you know it. I welcome your snark and hatred.
19 votes, 2 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
1) You will not vote for anyone who serves money interests | |
0 (0%) |
|
2) You will vote for anyone who serves money interests to gain a D win | |
0 (0%) |
|
3) You think that at this point big money is the only way Dems can win | |
1 (5%) |
|
4) You believe the majority of both parties have sold everyone out to money interests | |
13 (68%) |
|
5) You believe that the D party will only use a big money POTUS to help the 99% | |
0 (0%) |
|
6) You think there is no difference with those in both parties that accept influence money | |
1 (5%) |
|
7) You believe a 2016 Dem POTUS will be able to select a liberal SCOTUS judge with a majority GOP house | |
1 (5%) |
|
8) Purity test accusations are a bullshit response to people who want big money influence out of the Dem party | |
1 (5%) |
|
9) Be kind to rich people no matter what ...because George Carlin was right ...they own us. | |
2 (11%) |
|
10) I get no respect cause I haven't reach my million dollar index fund retirement goal | |
0 (0%) |
|
2 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
Autumn
(46,743 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Autumn
(46,743 posts)and I like 1 also. 9 was strictly sarcasm on my behalf
LWolf
(46,179 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)The choices are all about money. Yet the question is about political morals. I do not agree that all morality in politics is about money.
Raine1967
(11,617 posts)I can't morally vote in this poll for this reason. I personally have a problem with my morality being associated with money.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)Most politicians have sold out.
Government is broken.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)The only differences between the ostensible Repig and Dem wings is that the Dems will give on a few social isues where money and political power are not involved - reproductive rights, same-sex marriage, etc.
The economics of both wings are the same: Fuck the People and Serve the Wealthy. The proper name for this system is "feudalism."
hunter
(39,089 posts)Most candidates I vote for are the lesser of two evils.
As a radical social justice pacifist and radical environmentalist, political candidates who think like I do are rare.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)malokvale77
(4,879 posts)because I couldn't decide between #1, #4, #6 or #10.
I'm not use to so many choices. Usually I get to choose from evil and not quite as evil.
You have my head spinning.
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)Thanks for the giggle.
tabbycat31
(6,336 posts)Big money won't matter. But if one side is spending like a drunken sailor then the other has to (by default) or they look really bad.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)of people that chose option 3, and pretty certain they already have co-opted the party.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Blue_Tires
(57,038 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)NOT
BainsBane
(54,984 posts)What country did you think you were living all these years? You suddenly figured out in 2014 that the state serves the interests of capital? You're shocked the Democrats represent business interests? Does know one learn any history?
My political "morals" have to do with social justice. They don't revolve around the contests among political elites that are the sole obsession of many here.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)BainsBane
(54,984 posts)That goes a bit toward explaining why you don't understand the nature of the capitalist state you live under.
RedCappedBandit
(5,514 posts)The amount of integrity required not to be a sell out, at least at some level, is basically unattainable.
MineralMan
(148,090 posts)Last I heard, it was the Senate where confirmations happen. The House has no role at all.
I passed, by the way. I don't vote on push polls.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Try some more.
MineralMan
(148,090 posts)If you capitalize House, you're referring to the House of Representatives. Pretty simple, really. The House of Representatives has nothing to do with Presidential appointments.
Unless we can regain control of the Senate, no progressive SCOTUS justices will be successfully appointed by any President. That's just one of the reasons that elections really matter. We lost the Senate in 2014. We didn't have to.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Ya know what I don't need to see or respond your crap anymore.
MineralMan
(148,090 posts)Putting me on Ignore will solve the other problem.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Take comfort, - there's always a person (sometimes more than one) pretending to be clever. Usually though, they're the only ones who actually believe it.
olddots
(10,237 posts)Its good to have money .
Raine1967
(11,617 posts)For that reason I won't vote. Had you added that choice, it might have been a poll I wanted to vote in.