General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"Pro-Choice" or "Pro-Abortion"?
17 votes, 2 passes | Time left: Unlimited | |
"Pro-Choice" | |
15 (88%) |
|
"Pro-Abortion" | |
2 (12%) |
|
2 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided. | |
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll |
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)haikugal
(6,476 posts)I'm pro choice and pro abortion as well. It's health care, all of it!
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)I rec'd your other post with the excellent article.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Why does everyone keep trying to make us choose one or the other?
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)or not.
If you are really anti-abortion you would want to restrict or outlaw it.
If you really, truly and honestly want abortion to be an easily accessible and affordable option for all, you are pro-abortion whether you are willing to say the words or not.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)You can't say you support freedom of religion without supporting freedom from religion.
You can't claim you're pro-lgbt rights without supporting same sex marriage.
And you can't be pro-women's rights without being pro-abortion.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)You don't see that. And we shouldn't. It's irrelevant. We support others rights to. Period, the end.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)The arguments are - not surprisingly - almost identical.
There's always a judgment in there.
Amen sister.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)And I would support her in that choice too.
It is not my body, it is not my choice.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)For the life of me, I can't understand why that fact is so difficult for some to understand.
Oh, and except maybe for Buddhists, no one is pro-life, either - especially not fearmongering, gun-totin', warmongering RWers and Teabaggers.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)have you personally ever had an abortion?
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)I respect you for being both pro-abortion and pro-choice because you've personally experienced it.
I'm, personally, not pro-abortion. I've never had one and had long ago decided I never would. That's why I used bc, which had been, for me, 100% effective. However, I'm pro-choice, because it's none of my or anyone else's business what other women decide to do with their own bodies. Their life. Their bodies. Their choice.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)The reasons why are detailed link above.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)experience - and I'm 53 years old and lived both in The Netherlands and California. To be honest, I don't know you other than you being a DUer with a moniker. But people I know well and who have had abortions, tell me they're not pro-abortion.
I explained my initial post in my post below. Here's the link: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6565788
As medical procedures go, it was no big deal. I've had far worse.
haikugal
(6,476 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)enlightenment
(8,830 posts)I see nothing wrong with the procedure.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)But I, personally, have never met a woman in my personal life who was pro-abortion. Pro-choice? Absolutely. Pro-abortion? No.
I've met plenty women who have had many abortions (when I say "many", I mean two or three or more - one of my acquaintances confessed to me she had five since she was a little careless and already had four children).
And although they've been relieved to have had an abortion for personal reasons, they told me they didn't really like it. They saw it more as a necessary evil that they had to have performed. They said it was invasive. But, on the other hand, they could just as well tell me that so that they wouldn't be judged (and they should know I would never judge them as openly pro-choice as I am).
So my initial post was based on my experience, but clearly, I've learned something new today.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)not playing.
we are talking the lives of our girls and women. i find nothing cutsey about that.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)haikugal
(6,476 posts)I was called a murderer by a woman I had considered a friend. I'm sure I'm not alone.
BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)The disillusion alone; to discover that a friend would say such a thing to you, is enough to break my heart.
When I opted to keep my third child at 28, all my friends called me an idiot. Why would I want to have a third child in a world that's so horrible? How dumb of me to want to bring another child into this world. For the following seven months, they refused to respect my choice. It was very disheartening. Luckily, they were happy for me when my daughter was born, and they eventually came around to respect and accept my choice.
Anyway, we really need to kill the "pro-life" term. Unless they're Buddhists, they've most likely killed a fly or mosquito in their lifetime, so they really don't have a right to claim to be "pro-life". That's just my opinion.
haikugal
(6,476 posts)enlightenment
(8,830 posts)having an abortion. I had one - it wasn't an enjoyable thing. That said, it didn't leave me with any regrets, nor did it leave me traumatized, scarred, or any other thing that people say. It was an unpleasant medical procedure. Many medical procedures are unpleasant. End of story.
I appreciate your willingness to learn. That is a very important quality. Perhaps you might consider why I (and PeaceNikki and others) are supporting the use of the term 'pro-abortion'. It is, simply, a clear recognition of the fact that abortion is a medical procedure. If you are 'pro-choice' then you support the medical procedure. Why shy away from that?
Colonoscopy is not a pleasant medical procedure and I've never met anyone who enjoyed them - Root canals aren't enjoyable, either. We don't get our collective knickers in a twist over any medical procedure except abortion, and we try to hide the fact that we are saying that we support abortion by using the vague phrase "pro-choice" instead.
But by using that phrase, we open ourselves up to moving from supporting abortion to not supporting it, in the turn of a phrase. When someone says "I am pro-choice, BUT . . ." what they are saying is that they are not really pro-choice (and have you noticed that there is almost always a "but" attached?).
Choice is a matter for the individual. You choose chocolate, I choose vanilla. You might criticize my choice of flavor - but would you, for one moment, believe you had a right to try and limit my choice? Of course not. In the end, it matters not at all to you what ice cream I choose to eat, because you aren't eating it.
If a woman chooses to end a pregnancy, she is choosing abortion for herself. Why should anyone believe they have a right to try and limit her right to have that medical procedure? Do we suggest 24-hour waiting periods or mandatory counseling before having a mole removed?
The right and appropriate phrase really is "pro-abortion". We have to support the procedure - not just some vague sense of choice. A woman's right to choose abortion is being limited every day in this country, largely because we have buried the medical procedure beneath so many layers or fuzzy thinking that those who oppose abortion have been able to burrow in like termites and weaken the foundation of our conviction.
I believe that there is nothing wrong with abortion. I believe that there is nothing wrong with the word "abortion". I am not afraid to use the word or to say, out loud and in print, that I support abortion.
cyberswede
(26,117 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)I know you're not saying women who get abortions are evil but the "necessary evil" is a stigma we're trying to do away with, it's a safe legal medical procedure, nothing evil about it.
That's what I love about DU, haven't all of us evolved and changed our opinions based on reading about others' experiences?
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)Total bullshit concepts like 100% effective birth control. It doesn't exist.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)To me, the reason that a woman chooses to have an abortion is irrelevant to the her right to have one.
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)to-make-decisions-about-those-procedures.
enlightenment
(8,830 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)are not being fucked once again.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)i want the pill available in EVERY DAMN pharmacy across the fuckin nation. i WANT every damn doctor to be able to and to call in the damn prescription. that is what i want to start with
across the nation. not spotty state after FUCKIN spotty state.
Novara
(6,115 posts)The same access to women's healthcare needs to be nationwide. Women's rights need to be the same in every goddamn state. I have so HAD IT with red states shaming women and limiting their healthcare and their autonomy.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)not to be both? IE, pro-choice means you are pro-abortion and pro-abortion means you are pro-choice?
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)(thank you for putting this out). i see other arguments in this simple question. it is not so simple. takes on arms.
i do not care.
that is my argument.
dont care
we have our priorites. the loss of right and life, with state laws, dictating our girls by shame, guilt, humiliation. and inability to get legal medical procedures.
that is what i am addressing. let me be really bluntly clear on my position.
i am not walking into that argument, to divide feminists. i vowed i would NEVER play that game again.
Rex
(65,616 posts)I am a 'live and let live' kind of person. I just feel this is a no-brainer. You know what I mean.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)about what they do with their own bodies.
ScreamingMeemie
(68,918 posts)to anyone who has read the first page of DU GD today.
PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)MuseRider
(34,424 posts)I am pro abortion if a woman decides that is what she needs. I am pro choice that we all be able to decide what we need and act on it.
This is a terrible poll. To me pro choice means that I am pro choice and that means to me pro life and pro abortion but unless it is my own body it is none of my business.
roody
(10,849 posts)Shrike47
(6,913 posts)I had toxemia (pre-eclampsia) with both my sons and I was sick as a dog. My old, anti-abortion, right wing doctor counseled me to consider abortion with the second pregnancy. I could see it pained him to say it. He wouldn't himself do it but he would make a referral if I asked.
I CHOSE to have that child, and I am so glad. But it was MY choice and my life I risked. I would never force another woman go through what I went through.
graegoyle
(532 posts)There are too many people on this planet.
PeteSelman
(1,508 posts)I'm pro-death all around. Abortion, capital punishment, assisted suicide.
I believe in consistency.
Cal Carpenter
(4,959 posts)Well, except when safe, medical abortions are made inaccessible and women have to resort to desperate measures ('back-alley abortions' and such) and things go wrong.
I don't get what you mean by equating pro-abortion with "pro-death".
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)get from doctors and pharmaceuticals, that will do the same as the abortion pill. women across the nation is networking the information we need to self prescribe to take care of an early preg, least invasive.
because states are taking away our right to the pill.
PeteSelman
(1,508 posts)I recognize that you are killing something alive during the process. I have kids, I've seen the heart beating on the ultrasound in the early stages of development. It is what it is.
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)There's a difference between something having life and something being viable.
In the end, I don't care. It's the same as whether being gay or bi is a choice....who cares if it is? No one else's business.
Kali
(55,941 posts)not really very clever
PeteSelman
(1,508 posts)The truth?
I've never understood why anyone would deny the facts. Own it. I have no problem doing so.
Cal Carpenter
(4,959 posts)I suppose you think women who get abortions are murderers who should be jailed? Put to death even, ya know, for consistency?
PeteSelman
(1,508 posts)Of course I don't consider them murderers. Choosing to terminate your pregnancy, while killing the fetus, is not the same as murdering someone.
Come on now, don't put words in my mouth.
Cal Carpenter
(4,959 posts)You are the one who equated abortion with state-sanctioned murder, for example.
I'm taking your argument to its logical conclusion. For consistency.
One thing we agree on is that it's just stupid, though.
PeteSelman
(1,508 posts)And murder is murder.
Neither the Death Penalty nor abortion are murder but both are killing.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)PeteSelman
(1,508 posts)A bacteria or a virus will never be sentient no matter how long you let it grow.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)Death Penalty IS state sponsored murder. Historically, many non-guilty people have been murdered by the state.
88. Killing is killing.
And murder is murder.
Neither the Death Penalty nor abortion are murder but both are killing.
PeteSelman
(1,508 posts)But, administered properly, it is not murder but justice.
The living thing killed in the abortion process is no less innocent, is it not? But that doesn't seem to matter. It doesn't to me and it doesn't to you. We don't call it murder.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)Your posts come across as right wing talk to me. Death penalty is Justice? For whom, may I ask? Vengeance is more like it.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)I think that one should be given a wide berth.
Sometimes it's just not worth it.
PeteSelman
(1,508 posts)Justice for the victims and their families.
Sorry, I'm have no compassion for base murderers, rapists or pedophiles. The worst of the worst.
If that's right wing it's one of the few things they have right.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)122. Justice for society.
Justice for the victims and their families.
Sorry, I'm have no compassion for base murderers, rapists or pedophiles. The worst of the worst.
If that's right wing it's one of the few things they have right.
But I think you will get your "justice" soon enough.
124. And I should alert you for accusing me of bullshit.
But I'm not going to because the rat button is for cowards.
I'm as liberal as anyone here on nearly every issue.
I side with conservatives on capital punishment and immigration.
PeteSelman
(1,508 posts)But I'm not going to because the rat button is for cowards.
I'm as liberal as anyone here on nearly every issue.
I side with conservatives on capital punishment and immigration.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)But they are a good indicator of other things.
Not worth getting your posts hidden, seriously. When you see other posters letting those comments go it's usually for a good reason.
The one sticking up for Pete is just doing so because you irritated them.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)but I watch my hide count and lay off when I need to.
I agree though, many right wing ideas are common here. Reaganomics and gun nuttery are are safe views here currently. Not sure death penalty and immigration are that secure though. Just have to see how the cookie crumbles.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Depends how it's framed.
Some people know just how to phrase things. And the juries let a lot of stuff slide - like when it comes to punishment of prisoners.
Nothing wrong with pushing it, it worked out well on the root canal thread. Sometimes they'll show their true colours.
If they don't belong here they'll out themselves eventually.
pnwmom
(109,650 posts)PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)talking about death penalty and eventually immigration and how Pete agrees with Republicans on those issues.
pnwmom
(109,650 posts)He said that "something" was killed -- not that a human being was killed. An embryo or fetus is killed in the course of an abortion. Many people are uncomfortable even killing spiders. They are also uncomfortable killing fetuses, while recognizing that doing so does NOT constitute murder.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Pro-abortion suggests that you want all pregnancies terminated. Pro-choice suggests what others do with their bodies isn't your business.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)Everyone must drink my drink of choice!!
Edit - imo, only someone working from an authoritarian mindset would come to the conclusion that someone "pro-whatever" wishes to force that something on everyone and only an authoritarian would wish to force their choice upon everyone else (cough, cough, inevitable Hillary.)
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)They sure want to force something on others. Im prochoice, I want to force choice on others.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)Choice is the default until it is taken away. If choice is forced, nature has foisted choice upon us, not ourselves.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)You want to then take away choice and advocate for only one scenario. I am 100% pro-choice. The rest is silly semantics.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)I am pro-truck. (not really)
I also am pro-choice of transport, truck, car, bike, foot, etc.
Now, I cannot only be pro-choice, because there are many forces working to remove trucks from the list of choices. I must fight for the right to drive a truck as well as the right for people to choose their preferred method of transport.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)thing
noun \ˈthiŋ\
: an object whose name is not known or stated
: an object, animal, quality, etc., of any kind
: a particular event, occurrence, or situation
edit - and my post did not relate a person to a truck anyway. It related forms of birth control to forms of transportation.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)I will always try to disrupt people trying to put forth ideas I believe are detrimental to the bettering of the human condition.
Possibly you think "this poster is all about disruption" because you fall on the opposite side of the argument than I do more often than not. I can assure you that there are plenty of DU members that do not see me as a disruptor.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Bullshit.
I am pro-vasectomy, does that mean I want all men to get sterilized?
Every sperm is sacred...
Hepburn
(21,054 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)Means I am pro both.
Novara
(6,115 posts)LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)I don't particularly "like" abortion so I'm not pro abortion. That loaded term sounds like people who want more abortions to occur.
I like choice, though, so I'm pro-choice
fredamae
(4,458 posts)decision that is only the mother's to make. If her decision is to make it alone or with her partner and clergy is up to her and none of my business. My body? My choice. Period.
While I Choose (whole point of choice, right?) to not go that route, if I had a friend or family member who is facing that choice? I don't judge. I'm there for her for anything she needs. Period.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)Yeah, ask some man (probably a man) who represents a primitive patriarchal religion with a long history of treating women like less-than-shit (assuming it's Christianity, Judaism, I'm assuming not Islam) what she should do with her body. Ugh.
And, yes, of course a woman has the right to bring in the peddlers of the supernatural. I'm just saying it makes me sick that this is even a thing.
fredamae
(4,458 posts)choice of "consultants" either, but I must respect those who would make that choice. No judgment. We're all different...I'm "in training" to not let differences regulate how I consider "good hearted souls".
I've learned so much from posters here/there/everywhere and that is a good thing.
and note "mother" instead of woman.
zazen
(2,978 posts)Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)Abortion is a great option in A LOT of instances.
Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)krawhitham
(4,915 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)I believe it should be legal and safe.
elleng
(137,251 posts)Who is actually pro-abortion? as in, it's such a good thing? It isn't, but the right to have one, when needed, is protected by the constitution, as it should be. Our CHOICES are most important.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)cyberswede
(26,117 posts)...and consider if it really is a silly question.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026565158
Abortion isn't a bad thing, and it shouldn't be stigmatized as such.
NYC Liberal
(20,359 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Vinca
(51,350 posts)Just like it's nobody's business to know if I have had an abortion.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)Makes about as much sense as saying one is pro-choice but anti-abortion.
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)bigwillq
(72,790 posts)be it abortion, gay marriage, doing drugs or not doing drugs, gambling, shopping on-line, riding a ferris wheel, whatever it may be.
ibegurpard
(16,889 posts)Unless I am personally involved in a situation where it is a possibility...and even then the decision is not mine to make.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)that legislators should not restrict a woman's choice
ileus
(15,396 posts)If used properly it can be a form of population control. Population control = carbon footprint reduction. Carbon footprint reduction is a good thing....
bobjacksonk2832
(50 posts)Why can't these right wing numbskulls get that through their heads? It's like talking to a brick wall when it comes to discussing this issue with them. So infuriating.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)nice try though.
dembotoz
(16,922 posts)kydo
(2,679 posts)"If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice."
Even choosing to be Pro-Life is really Pro-Choice, that person made a choice and that's what I support, the right to choose.
Reter
(2,188 posts)If some of our Democratic Congressmen and Senators are pro-life, some are on DU too.
Tracyjo
(742 posts)And pro-life too.
LostOne4Ever
(9,604 posts)Jamastiene
(38,197 posts)Your poll options are very incomplete.