Announcements
Related: About this forumThe 2016 Postmortem Forum Will Close on Friday 1/20
This discussion thread was locked by Skinner (a host of the Announcements group).
As you all know, Donald Trump will be inaugurated as our next president this Friday, January 20. With this in mind, it is time for DUers to stop fighting about the 2016 presidential election and start coming together to face the threat of a Trump Presidency. I know this news will be a disappointment to the small minority of DUers who REALLY REALLY REALLY want to convince the rest of us that Hillary Clinton and/or Bernie Sanders is totally the worst thing that ever happened EVER, but the rest of us will be relieved to put an end to the infighting.
Here's what's going to happen:
The 2016 Postmortem forum will shut down.
It will be saved as a read-only archive so we can go back from time-to-time and remind ourselves how pointless and annoying these arguments really were.
We will bring back the "Don't keep fighting primaries" rule.
You may remember that before the November election we had a rule against re-hashing the Democratic primary. Now that the postmortem period is over, that rule is going to come back. For the record, here is the text of the rule:
Regardless of whether you supported a winning candidate or a losing candidate, do not prolong the agony of the last Democratic presidential primary by continuing to pick fights, place blame, tear down former primary candidates, bait former supporters, or do anything else to pour salt on old wounds.
Why we have this rule: Most of our members want this to be forward-looking, friendly community that is focused on creating a better future for our country. Continuing to rehash old fights that have already been resolved is divisive and counter-productive.
If you read that rule and think to yourself, "For fuck's sake, how will I be able to insult supporters of Hillary Clinton and/or Bernie Sanders NOW?!?!?!" then you are precisely the person this rule was intended to thwart. I am already pre-ignoring your impotent howls of protest.
The impending Trump administration is going to be an unmitigated disaster for America. Let's come together here on DU to fight it.
Lochloosa
(16,401 posts)sarah FAILIN
(2,857 posts)meadowlark5
(2,795 posts)SMC22307
(8,090 posts)ogradda
(3,411 posts)That was funny as hell.
progressoid
(50,743 posts)tenorly
(2,037 posts)I always objected to the name of the thread; rather than 'post-mortem' it should have been called 'post-fortum' (post-theft).
SHRED
(28,136 posts)JPPaverage
(577 posts)And now, more than ever we must be united. Comrade trump and co. will try to do unlimited and unrecoverable damage to our country. We must stay together to stop them. Thank you.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Excellent rule.
Alice11111
(5,730 posts)NRaleighLiberal
(60,496 posts)retrowire
(10,345 posts)NRaleighLiberal
(60,496 posts)So we will go to lunch, Sue will make my favorite cake, and we will plan our Keys vacation which begins on her birthday - the 22nd!
LongTomH
(8,636 posts)uppityperson
(115,869 posts)niyad
(119,888 posts)and delight.
happy happy birthday!!!
longship
(40,416 posts)R&
lastlib
(24,902 posts)will it be archived in any way to be viewable in the future?
Asking since it might be useful for future reference.
Lochloosa
(16,401 posts)It will be saved as a read-only archive so we can go back from time-to-time and remind ourselves how pointless and annoying these arguments really were.
avebury
(11,073 posts)Maybe a forum to deal with taking the fight to Trump and the Republicans?
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)the Powers stand strong and that remains only a joke.
Avebury, the Postmortem Regulars are far too invested in battling each other to switch to what's happening on the right. Their choice long ago, and that's the problem of them.
herding cats
(19,612 posts)We need to unite our voices in opposition to what the Republicans have planned for us. It's going to be an extremely rough four years, and much of the damage could potentially last for generations.
Lifelong Protester
(8,421 posts)Hekate
(94,625 posts)liquid diamond
(1,917 posts)Paladin
(28,755 posts)Saviolo
(3,321 posts)Choice excerpts:
It will be saved as a read-only archive so we can go back from time-to-time and remind ourselves how pointless and annoying these arguments really were.
If you read that rule and think to yourself, "For fuck's sake, how will I be able to insult supporters of Hillary Clinton and/or Bernie Sanders NOW?!?!?!" then you are precisely the person this rule was intended to thwart. I am already pre-ignoring your impotent howls of protest.
Time for EVERYONE to come together. Put hurt feelings aside, because what's coming is going to hurt a lot more if we can't work together.
NightWatcher
(39,358 posts)We advance or die.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Rs will focus on the Ds left in our Congress & Senate and they will take them out without a lot of help.
I also wish DU was a part of the investigations (if there are any) for all the hacking done to D party. This message board was hacked and the FBI has the resources to find who did it. That persons criminal ass should be nailed to the wall by now.
Hekate
(94,625 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)This message board is the #1 ranked D party board in the world, yet it was dominated by the word trump in almost 90% of headlines and fully silenced by some republican with a hack.
The board got one letter from Sanders, (to thank for DU donations) never a contact from Clinton campaign and one primary press credential from Clinton campaign.
We also need a DU twitter forum, so we can directly connect with our D party officials and directly tweet the new president. He shouldn't be allowed a twitter platform with hardly any challenge from Ds. Twitter is free and it's a very powerful platform.
Beartracks
(13,564 posts)get the red out
(13,580 posts)I am relieved.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,374 posts)But this is all open to interpretation.
What about this period of re-evaluating the Democratic party and re-examining its past directions to develop new strategies. The Clintons and their 'triangulation' idea have been very influential in the direction of the party for a couple of decades now. Obama tried his best to continue that. So I hope we can still talk about this, out of the context of the primaries of course.
I guess the question boils down to..What if I or someone else is critical of the Clintons influence, in order to help develop better directions for the party, without a past Hillary supporter alerting on an OP or post because they took it as a personal insult towards Hillary? And more important, would that post/OP be verboten?
mopinko
(71,798 posts)that would be the point.
in the end it depends on the juries. if you post is newsworthy, and not just a rehash, it will likely survive.
or like your mama told you, if you cant say something nice dont say anything at all. manners, it is about manners.
i approve of being done w the navel gazing, and galvanizing for the fight ahead. the fight of our lives.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,374 posts)Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.
Call it navel gazing, but I hardly think it is in the best interests of moving forward a party by putting blinders on and doing the same thing over and over. That is called insanity. And to Democrats, that is called losing.
mopinko
(71,798 posts)living in the past is not exactly a recipe for success, either.
holding old grudges, licking old wounds. not a fertile field either.
let it go.
Hekate
(94,625 posts)LiberalLovinLug
(14,374 posts)I was referring to the greater history, before and after.
I was just saying that there will be a fine line drawn.
So will it be ok to look back and say, "this this and this did work, and this this and this did not work" in showing voters that the Democrats are the best option? Can we do that without mentioning any faults in positioning by certain prominent individuals? Or do we just never mention certain names ever again? i'm just wondering how this is going to work, is all.
BainsBane
(54,756 posts)Last edited Wed Jan 18, 2017, 04:11 PM - Edit history (1)
but from what I've observed, most prefer mythology.
If the entire focus remains on individuals, then there is no future for the party or democracy. It would be nice if people decided that issues, principles, and policy actually mattered rather than engineering everything to promote one person's career. That of course would require something beyond the Manichaean worldview that dominates politics today. From what I have seen in the campaign and in the postmortem forum since, I see no signs of a desire to change that. Determining certain people are perfect and others are sell- outs is easier than actually having to think about issues and policies in productive terms. That particular development is relatively recent, (rather its revival since societies were once dominated by kings and strongmen) and, I believe, indicative of the decline of the kind of political culture necessary to sustain democracy. That is not doing the same thing over and over again. It is making it decidedly worse.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,374 posts)"It would be nice if people decided that issues, principles, and policy actually mattered rather than engineering everything to promote one person's career."
There is a mythology that Reagan was one of the greatest presidents. Unless you actually look at his "accomplishments"
Just like the mythology that the Republicans are trying (but I think will fail) to cement about Obama that he was a 'disaster'.
I too want to go deeper than mythology and have an honest look at the direction that the DLC has taken the party. That may involve criticism, and in that criticism names may be mentioned. At least that's how its usually done. I'd like to think this is a place we can speak our minds even if it may be uncomfortable for some to hear, or may include a name attached to that criticism that some only want to be spoken in glowing terms.
mopinko
(71,798 posts)you will be judged by a jury of your peers. if that isnt enough for you, i dont know what to say.
Lil Missy
(17,865 posts)Iggo
(48,262 posts)retrowire
(10,345 posts)Now can everyone join me in quiet anger already? Damn.
Aristus
(68,327 posts)Forward together. Stronger together.
TygrBright
(20,987 posts)Sissyk
(12,665 posts)demmiblue
(37,849 posts)A lot of really interesting things in GD go unnoticed due to all the Trump threads. Also, it would really serve as a nice reprieve when people need to take a little break from the darkness and insanity that is Trump. I know there are groups, but many of them are lucky to get a handful of posts in a month... I don't see that changing (it seems that most DUers gravitate toward GD).
P.S. The inmates escaped that prison a long time ago!
RockaFowler
(7,429 posts)Freethinker65
(11,134 posts)CajunBlazer
(5,648 posts)democrank
(11,250 posts)greatauntoftriplets
(176,838 posts)hamsterjill
(15,507 posts)Skinner, I'm fine with the forum closing, but I am NOT fine with Donald Trump being referred to as "our" President. He will be "the" President.
Not my President. Not now. Not ever.
Am I ready to fight the Trump administration? Bring it, baby! I will give that effort my all.
Turbineguy
(38,372 posts)we're going to live through it then.....
VOX
(22,976 posts)Ilsa
(62,231 posts)Rustyeye77
(2,736 posts)yuiyoshida
(42,714 posts)still_one
(96,523 posts)revmclaren
(2,613 posts)Deb
(3,744 posts)Stellar
(5,644 posts)I never felt that about Hillary or Bernie. I just HATE the GOPee's!!!
Hekate
(94,625 posts)CTyankee
(65,012 posts)my husband supported Hillary. We never fought over our differences. He felt strongly about Hillary and I felt strongly about Bernie. So what?
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)As one expert explained in short form, "the far right hates everyone else and the far left hates itself." Those on the far left are wired to focus hostility and aggression that come naturally to both on the mainstream left, leaving them with little left over for what's happening on the right.
They're easy--it's a personality thing. Bernie and Hillary are just the current focus. Most followers of both were like you and your husband, and they (and you) got along just fine because they aren't given to extremist/radical reactions.
The ones I haven't had explained to me are those here on DU who seem to have become addicted to fighting back at the far left. We are in an era where hyperpartisanship is normal, and groups are moving farther and farther toward extremism in large numbers.
CTyankee
(65,012 posts)if we all survive in the next 4 years. I dread it.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)so that works. How ironic that we on the left are filled with the kind of anxiety usually reserved for irrational conservatives, while many of them are still beaming happily about the great "advances" they are enabling.
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)It will not be missed.
47of74
(18,470 posts)Regardless of where they come from.
mountain grammy
(27,271 posts)angrychair
(9,732 posts)We are either united in our fight against trump's agenda or we will all become a victim of it.
rug
(82,333 posts)Shrek
(4,129 posts)Because your candidate, whoever it might be, is immutably awful.
mvd
(65,452 posts)It was left open for a nice long time, and now everything about the election that has been said has been said.
rtracey
(2,062 posts)This is the time we really need to get the 2018 vote out........starts now
ladjf
(17,320 posts)a waste of time the anti Clinton and Sanders posts were. But, maybe we can move on now.
Maeve
(42,959 posts)Thanks, Boss!
mahatmakanejeeves
(60,923 posts)libdem4life
(13,877 posts)Starting at the top...his crooked and rich compadres who are mostly incapable of their cabinet level positions. They are falling like flies. Guess they didn't comprehend they would be, gasp, Public Servants in these roles and, another gasp, held accountable for their former acts.
Sad. LOL.
tavalon
(27,985 posts)But, damn, I love you!
LostOne4Ever
(9,596 posts)QC
(26,371 posts)ornotna
(11,069 posts)Thanks Skinner.
Raine
(30,602 posts)MicaelS
(8,747 posts)Rather than having everything dumped into GD.
sheshe2
(87,464 posts)stuffmatters
(2,576 posts)We are facing a previously unimaginable monstrosity of a government without any functioning checks and balances.
TheCowsCameHome
(40,215 posts)Tiggeroshii
(11,088 posts)NastyRiffraff
(12,448 posts)It's an ugly reminder of the primary mess we had here. I'm very glad to see it go.
WyLoochka
(1,638 posts)get together so we can put up an effective opposition to stop the Trumpsters and the evil aims of Ryan - McConnell and their wrecking crews
MADem
(135,425 posts)This makes the Bush years look simply somewhat hellish by comparison...
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)Lithos
(26,452 posts)There is a baseline of reality we now need to accept. I'm tired of the shoulda-coulda-woulda's
There were mistakes, let's not make another one by rehashing the past. Focus on the imminent issues at hand lest they overwhelm us.
L-
AgadorSparticus
(7,963 posts)So glad this rule is coming back!!!! Thank you Skinner!
We have bigger fish to fry...
betsuni
(27,255 posts)Lots of propaganda debunked and I thank everyone who took the time to do the debunking. If anyone's still repeating that anti-Democratic junk and false equivalency after this year, it will be very very disappointing. I also think it's fun when the tables are turned and the usual trolls become the trollees -- they get really mad, but never seem to learn that if you do it to others, don't be surprised to get the same back. It's your game, why the shock when others play? Interesting.
Dark n Stormy Knight
(10,026 posts)RiverStone
(7,241 posts)steve2470
(37,468 posts)We need to impeach this SOB or at least prevent him from harming the country!
lillypaddle
(9,605 posts)beating a dead horse and all that ...
ConSciousReset
(11 posts)Sounds nice
greyl
(22,997 posts)Raster
(20,999 posts)Beartracks
(13,564 posts)Response to Skinner (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Bucky
(55,334 posts)It's been 18 months since he was inaugurated, right?