CEO Of Company Responsible For Porter Ranch Gas Leak To Get $3 Million Bonus
Source: LAist
<snip>
Despite being in charge of the company responsible for the largest environmental disaster in California's recent historythe infamous Porter Ranch Gas Leakthe CEO of Sempra Energy, the parent company of SoCalGas, will receive a $3.17 million bonus this year. Added to her usual salary, Debra L. Reed will net a total of $16.1 million in pay for the 2015 year, according to the company's proxy statement (search "bonuses paid" .
Don't worry, thoughCalifornia is making sure Ms. Reed will pay for the disaster. A penalty levied by the State will set her back a whopping $130,000, according to the Los Angeles Times. But as the Times so succinctly points out, this penalty amounts to just eight tenths of 1 percent of her total pay.
Along with Reed, Sempra Energy's president, executive vice president, chief financial officer, and general counsel are all also getting bonuses, amounting to about $3.9 million combined. Their combined penalty is just $157,000.
As Paula Cracium, president of the Porter Ranch Neighborhood Council said to the Times, "This sends out a signal that as long as the dollars are there, the impact on people, homes and the environment doesn't matter. That's not the signal we need to send to executives who have so much power."
<snip>
Read more: http://laist.com/2016/03/29/ceo_of_company_responsible_for_port.php
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)that is why they are paid so much
according to the repubs I talk to
DavidDvorkin
(19,985 posts)RecoveringJournalist
(179 posts)They are just paid to be cunning. EOM
Pakhet
(520 posts)that they work so much harder than the rest of us too. (Where's the bitter sarcasm smilie?)
KT2000
(21,020 posts)at least he will talk about such betrayals.
She should turn all of it over to the people affected.
stellanoir
(14,881 posts)a few hundred thousand dollar fine for their faulty blow out value that damned near exterminated the Gulf of Mexico.
May the profiteers of exploitation no longer gain from further such toxic folly !!!
Ughhh ~
Maybe the 99% of everybody could sue the whole slew of eco slobs on behalf of Gaia.
We are probably all obliged to do so.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)The rules of physics don't even apply to them.
Must be nice.
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)who runs things, this sort of behavior makes it hard not to get the message loud and clear.
chapdrum
(930 posts)Megacorporations first.
ALL else to the back of the line.
Health, schmealth; sick folk spend big, baby.
So f*cking criminal, venal and sordid.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Really, there's nothing like a $3 million bonus to cheer up one's spirits on a cloudy day. Like Sempra Energy, it's the least they can do.
not "he".
So much for the gender thing.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)In addition to failing to read thoroughly, I automatically "assumed" the CEO was male, based on my own construct stereotypes for behavior. From now on, I will remember women can be crooked and head crooked organizations, too.
ETA: Even though it reads that way, it is not meant to sound snarky. I do not know if the CEO in the present case was criminally negligent or otherwise. Accidents do happen. It's just in the energy and extraction industries, so does crime.
LiberalFighter
(53,529 posts)passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)This is disgraceful!
valerief
(53,235 posts)Vinca
(51,350 posts)It reminds me of the Wall Street crash when the banksters got their big bonuses . . . thanks to the largesse of the taxpayers.
ProfessorGAC
(70,992 posts). . .the excuse for that was to retain high level talent. The same high level talent that caused the problem in the first place got bonuses to stick around and recover from their own failures. I don't think these folks really know what "bonus" means.
villager
(26,001 posts)Or "empathy," of course, but that went without saying.