John Paul Stevens, longtime leader of Supreme Court's liberal wing, dies at 99
Source: Washington Post
John Paul Stevens, a moderate midwestern Republican and former antitrust lawyer from Chicago who evolved into a savvy and sometimes passionate leader of the Supreme Courts liberal wing and became the third-longest-serving justice on the high court before his retirement in 2010, died July 16 at a hospital in Fort Lauderdale, Fla. He was 99.
The cause was complications from a stroke that he suffered yesterday, according to an announcement from the Supreme Court. The only justices who served longer were William O. Douglas, whom Justice Stevens replaced in 1975, and Stephen J. Field, a nominee of President Abraham Lincoln who served for much of the late 19th century.
During his 35-year tenure, Justice Stevens left his stamp on nearly every area of the law, writing the courts opinions in landmark cases on government regulation, the death penalty, criminal law, intellectual property and civil liberties. Justice Stevens also spoke for the court when it held presidents accountable under the law, writing the 1997 decision that required President Bill Clinton to face Paula Joness sexual harassment suit, and the 2006 opinion that barred President George W. Bush from holding military trials for prisoners at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base without congressional authorization.
But it was in his frequent dissenting opinions that Stevens set forth a view of the law that seemed increasingly but not automatically liberal as the years went by and as the court itself shifted right. A strong proponent of federal power, Justice Stevens sharply criticized the limitations Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist and his fellow conservatives put on Congresss power to define and remedy violations of federal law by the states. In Bush v. Gore, the 2000 election case that helped George W. Bush win the presidency, Justice Stevens lamented in dissent that the five Republican justices who backed Bush would lend credence to the most cynical appraisal of the work of judges throughout the land.
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/obituaries/john-paul-stevens-longtime-leader-of-supreme-courts-liberal-wing-dies-at-99/2019/07/16/701232a2-a829-11e9-86dd-d7f0e60391e9_story.html
Original article and headline -
By Washington Post Staff
July 16 at 8:42 PM
Stevens evolved into a savvy and sometimes passionate leader of the high courts liberal wing and became the third-longest-serving justice in Supreme Court history.
During his 35-year tenure, Justice Stevens left his stamp on nearly every area of the law, writing the courts opinions in several landmark cases.
This is a developing story. It will be updated.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/politics/wp/2019/07/16/former-justice-john-paul-stevens-who-led-the-supreme-courts-liberal-wing-before-his-retirement-in-2010-dies-at-99/?utm_term=.403ed06dbd00
Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)
applegrove This message was self-deleted by its author.
Clash City Rocker
(3,543 posts)Without Stevens, America would have been a much darker place.
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)Clash City Rocker
(3,543 posts)Brainfodder
(7,181 posts)It's my twilight zone episode too!
hlthe2b
(107,173 posts)ms liberty
(9,899 posts)sinkingfeeling
(53,406 posts)DeminPennswoods
(16,372 posts)I recall his scathing dissent in Bush v Gore. I printed it out and read it.
FakeNoose
(36,186 posts)Rest in Peace, sir!
ancianita
(39,041 posts)UpInArms
(51,949 posts)In Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98 (2000), Stevens wrote a scathing dissent on the Court's ruling to stay the recount of votes in Florida during the 2000 presidential election. He believed that the holding displayed "an unstated lack of confidence in the impartiality and capacity of the state judges who would make the critical decisions if the vote count were to proceed." He continued, "The endorsement of that position by the majority of this Court can only lend credence to the most cynical appraisal of the work of judges throughout the land. It is confidence in the men and women who administer the judicial system that is the true backbone of the rule of law. Time will one day heal the wound to that confidence that will be inflicted by today's decision. One thing, however, is certain. Although we may never know with complete certainty the identity of the winner of this year's Presidential election, the identity of the loser is perfectly clear. It is the Nation's confidence in the judge as an impartial guardian of the rule of law."
dalton99a
(85,176 posts)still_one
(96,908 posts)DonaldsRump
(7,715 posts)Great jurist and great hero.
He is what makes America great.
Judi Lynn
(162,664 posts)BlueWI
(1,736 posts)A warrior for human rights. All of us have big shoes to fill.
Aristus
(68,771 posts)You were proof that, once upon a time, the Republican Party was an honorable institution.