FBI director suggests Donald Trump may not have been struck by bullet during assassination attempt at rally
Source: yahoo
Josh Salisbury Thu, 25 July 2024 at 2:05 am GMT-5
The FBIs director has revealed that investigators still do not know whether it was a bullet or some shrapnel which grazed Donald Trumps ear during his attempted assassination.
Christopher Wray told a marathon session of the US House Judiciary Committee that the FBI was still working to determine exactly what hit the former presidents ear during the shooting.
My understanding is that either it [a bullet] or some shrapnel is what grazed his ear, he said.
Asked by lawmakers if the FBI knew where all eight bullets fired by shooter Thomas Crooks at the rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, Mr Wray added: There is some question about whether or not it was a bullet or shrapnel that hit his ear, so it is conceivable, as I sit here right now, I dont know whether that bullet, in addition to causing the grazing, could have also landed somewhere else.................
Read more: https://uk.news.yahoo.com/fbi-director-suggests-donald-trump-070533095.html
As far as I know, Trump has not responded to Wray's comment about the FBI not knowing if it was a bullet or shrapnel that hit Trump's ear.
Trump has said that he was struck by a bullet.
Link to tweet
sop
(11,092 posts)Funtatlaguy
(11,790 posts)Pototan
(1,965 posts)But I welcome the added attention on the subject
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100219233413
Novara
(6,113 posts)Then they can't prove he was hit by one. For all we know, with that small amount of bleeding, someone hit him from behind with a powerful spitball.
Maybe we should spread that rumor.
Orrex
(64,022 posts)sir pball
(4,940 posts)If this sociopath had a 7.62 instead, we'd very likely all be in an unthinkable world of shit right now.
doc03
(36,570 posts)the others wounded in the attack. Under normal circumstances the hospital would have been surrounded by news vans
wanting some statement from doctors.
llmart
(16,328 posts)are his shoes OK? That's what concerned him the most in the moment - not his ear.
Bengus81
(7,340 posts)an active shooter still firing. But yeah.....scapegoat the Director of the SS,call it all her fault and try to quickly bury the rest.
As I've said since it happened,this whole "event" stinks.
llmart
(16,328 posts)He probably hates that there are pics out there of the back of his head with the dinner plate-sized bald spot.
Such a narcissist.
jvill
(352 posts)
twodogsbarking
(12,228 posts)Talitha
(7,440 posts)Mr. Wray suggests it may not have been a bullet. So if it was a projectile, what could it have been?
Has there been an analysis of the photo by an expert, to determine the possibility of it being a bullet as regards to speed, distance and angle? I also recall reading that it was a teleprompter fragment, but close-up images showed they were not damaged.
William Seger
(11,020 posts)The speed of the projectile can be determined from the length of the streak it made, which looks to be only about 18 inches or so. If it was supersonic, then it was a bullet; otherwise it was shrapnel. I've been thinking of trying to contact the photographer to ask.
But to me, the fact that Trump said it made a "loud whizzing sound" (instead of sounding like a bullwhip, as a supersonic bullet would) is conclusive evidence it was shrapnel.
republianmushroom
(17,318 posts)Link to tweet
?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1815332459237535869%7Ctwgr%5Eb869af7463dbc7f6827ed605648c3284c4744f05%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.democraticunderground.com%2F%3Fcom%3Dview_postforum%3D1002pid%3D19230934
the convicted felon lies a lot and the media helps him get away with it.
Bayard
(24,145 posts)I think even a graze from a bullet would have blown his ear off.