Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(137,745 posts)
Thu Sep 12, 2024, 12:34 PM Thursday

North Dakota judge strikes down the state's abortion ban

Last edited Thu Sep 12, 2024, 01:23 PM - Edit history (1)

Source: AP

Updated 1:09 PM EDT, September 12, 2024


BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) — A state judge struck down North Dakota’s ban on abortion Thursday, saying that the state constitution creates a fundamental right to access abortion before a fetus is viable. In his ruling, state District Judge Bruce Romanick also said that the law violates the state constitution because it is too vague.

Romanick was ruling on a request from the state to dismiss a 2022 lawsuit filed against the ban by what at the time was the sole abortion clinic in North Dakota. The clinic has sinced moved across the border to Minnesota, and the state argued that a trial wouldn’t make a difference. The judge had canceled a trial set for August.

Romanick cited how North Dakota Constitution’s guarantees “inalienable rights,” including “life and liberty.” “The abortions statutes at issue in this case infringes on a woman’s fundamental right to procreative autonomy, and are not narrowly tailored to promote women;s health or to protect unborn human life,” Romanick wrote in his 24-page order. “The law as currently drafted takes away a woman’s liberty and her right to pursue and obtain safety and happiness.”

Romanick was first elected a district judge in heavily-GOP North Dakota in 2000 and has been reelected every six years since, most recently in 2018. Before he was a judge, he was an assistant state’s attorney in Burleigh County, home to the state capital of Bismarck.

Read more: https://apnews.com/article/north-dakota-abortion-law-ban-ruling-30fedd2e4dec03da43bd3bcce60f867b



Breaking. Short article at post time.

Article updated.

Original article -

Updated 12:26 PM EDT, September 12, 2024


BISMARCK, N.D. (AP) — A state judge struck down North Dakota’s ban on abortion Thursday, saying that the state constitution creates a fundamental right to access abortion before a fetus is viable.

In his ruling, state District Judge Bruce Romanick also said that the law violates the state constitution because it is too vague.

Romanick was ruling on a request from the state to dismiss a lawsuit filed against the ban in 2022 by what at the time was the sole abortion clinic in North Dakota. The clinic has sinced moved across the border to Minnesota, and the state argued that a trial wouldn’t make a difference. The judge had canceled a trial set for August.

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
North Dakota judge strikes down the state's abortion ban (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Thursday OP
Kick Attilatheblond Thursday #1
Too vague? Means they will be back, it is not over. Bev54 Thursday #2
Yep and they are in session Dr. Shepper Thursday #7
Funny how the judge narrows this down "bodily autonomy" to "freedom". Probatim Thursday #3
This is big Bayard Thursday #4
I agree. yonder Thursday #8
Big enough to spread across the country calimary Friday #10
Awesome news! Maybe they'll rewrite the law to be "less vague"...but for now, gonna celebrate this victory. iluvtennis Thursday #5
100% agree! ShazzieB Thursday #6
Exactly. n/t iluvtennis Thursday #9

Probatim

(2,887 posts)
3. Funny how the judge narrows this down "bodily autonomy" to "freedom".
Thu Sep 12, 2024, 01:49 PM
Thursday

Does he kick it back to them for a rewrite to "promote unborn human life"?

yonder

(9,893 posts)
8. I agree.
Thu Sep 12, 2024, 03:37 PM
Thursday

Last edited Thu Sep 12, 2024, 04:21 PM - Edit history (1)

I doubt this "life and liberty" ruling is unique, but in my layman's opinion, could be very useful in how it might apply to other states or even the U.S. Constitution's amendments laying out the prohibtion of deprivations of "life, liberty, or property".

In this case, it's not "life then liberty". It is "life AND liberty". A ruling for either life or liberty cannot exclude the other because both terms are mutually inclusive. Unless legislation is adopted to distinguish the two, both terms carry equal weight, IMO.

So yes, this is big.

iluvtennis

(20,474 posts)
5. Awesome news! Maybe they'll rewrite the law to be "less vague"...but for now, gonna celebrate this victory.
Thu Sep 12, 2024, 02:08 PM
Thursday

ShazzieB

(17,973 posts)
6. 100% agree!
Thu Sep 12, 2024, 02:55 PM
Thursday

As things now stand in this country, a victory like this is always going to be temporary. This will be appealed, for sure.

But even a temporary victory like this is a victory for sanity, rationally, and the rights of women to be fully recognized as autonomous human beings, and it deserves to be celebrated as such.

We can celebrate winning a battle while at the same time knowing that the war is far from over.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»North Dakota judge strike...