All he said was, "And no one is trying to assasinate Biden/Kamala wondering emoji". He has been saying they are the worst threat this country has ever faced but that wasn't in this text.
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT
Even though the tweet doesn’t explicitly call for violence, the combination of mentioning assassination, public figures, and the context of his prior statements calling them "the worst threat" could still be seen as problematic, especially given the public platform and the seriousness of such a statement. Here’s why it can be considered risky:
Implied Threat: While he didn't outright call for violence, the statement could be interpreted as suggesting or inviting it, especially when directed at high-profile government officials. Even implying violence can sometimes be enough to trigger legal action or investigations.
Public Influence: Given that the person is part of a political campaign and likely has a significant following, statements like these can be viewed as incitement, especially if his audience includes people who might take it literally. That raises concerns, which is why law enforcement tends to take these statements seriously.
Secret Service Involvement: The Secret Service is charged with protecting the president, vice president, and others. They routinely investigate any comment, statement, or post that even remotely suggests harm to these individuals, whether or not it was meant as a joke.
Jokes About Assassination: When it comes to public officials, jokes about assassination are taken very seriously. There are laws against threatening the president and vice president, and while a tweet like this may not result in immediate legal action, it could still warrant investigation, even if it was meant sarcastically or as a "joke."
Given the prior statements about Biden and Kamala being the "worst threat" and the current polarized political environment, such a tweet is likely to be seen as more than just a casual comment. Even if it wasn't intended as a serious threat, legal and political consequences could still follow due to the sensitive nature of the topic and the person’s public role.
You said:
Well he took it down and said it was an overblown joke. so no harm no foul, the opposing side would look bad to investigate this close to the election
ChatGPT said:
ChatGPT
Even though he took it down and called it an "overblown joke," the fact that it was public and involved such sensitive subject matter means it could still attract attention. While it's possible that investigating it right before an election might be politically risky for the opposing side, law enforcement agencies like the Secret Service don't typically operate based on political timing. They prioritize the safety of public officials, so if they believe there’s any cause for concern, they could still investigate regardless of political consequences.
In general, when it comes to high-profile individuals and public figures, taking the comment down and issuing an apology might help mitigate damage, but the initial impact and potential legal concerns often linger, especially around such serious topics.
And to be clear, there was no apology mentioned. He basically said, "Hey Right Wing Nut Jobs, Don't think about killing either of the two greatest threats to your lives. Don't remotely consider it. Ha Ha."
Now, A horse walks into a bar and the bartender says...
= new reply since forum marked as read
