Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(142,815 posts)
Sun Sep 29, 2024, 10:19 AM Sep 29

'Not normal': Social media reacts after Trump makes bizarre comments about a fly he's bothered by on stage

Source: The Independent

3 hours ago


Former President Donald Trump expressed his frustration over a fly that approached his lectern in a bizarre moment during a rally speech. Trump was on stage at Prairie du Chien, Wisconsin, making a point about a hat, when he appeared to get distracted by the creature.

“Oh there’s a fly,” the former president said. “I wonder where the fly came from?” One audience member shouted out “Kamala.” Trump continued: “See, two years ago, I wouldn’t have had a fly up here. You’re changing rapidly. We can’t take it any longer.” It wasn’t clear who or what the president was referring to before he changed the subject.

The internet was quick to react to Trump’s unexpected outburst, with MSNBC host and legal analyst Katie Phang saying “this is not normal.” Meanwhile, American Bridge 21st Century, who describe themselves an a Republican accountability group, said: “Trump is exhausted and struggling to stay on track. He begins a story about a hat, but gets distracted by a fly and never finishes. He starts a entirely new story and struggles with the word “unique.”

Many others drew the comparison between Trump and former Vice President Mike Pence, after a fly landed on the latter’s head and remained there for almost two minutes during his 2020 debate with Kamala Harris.

Read more: https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-fly-rally-wisconsin-rally-speech-b2620657.html






Acyn
@Acyn
·
Follow
Trump: Oh, there's a fly. Oh, I wonder where the fly came from. See, two years ago, I wouldn't have had a fly up here. You’re changing rapidly. We can’t take it any longer
4:33 PM · Sep 28, 2024
66 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'Not normal': Social media reacts after Trump makes bizarre comments about a fly he's bothered by on stage (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Sep 29 OP
Flies do not get distracted. They know what they like and focus in. Attilatheblond Sep 29 #1
That's true. Our cat keeps the house clear of insects and spiders. yardwork Sep 29 #5
I think it's time to move past "not normal." He's senile. We need to use the "TOO OLD" meme in ads mpcamb Sep 29 #57
Are you old enough to remember the Memorex cassett tape ads? 'Is it live or is it Memorex?' Attilatheblond Sep 29 #63
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Sep 29 #2
This guy knows BaronChocula Sep 29 #51
This message was self-deleted by its author Chin music Sep 29 #53
And they will still vote for him. How many, though, hope for him to step down and will be happy question everything Sep 29 #3
Difference is Trump is distracted by flies SomedayKindaLove Sep 29 #4
Was it wearing a tiny little Kamala sign? Bayard Sep 29 #6
Thom Hartmann mentioned this technique he thinks tRump is using yaesu Sep 29 #7
I hope that Hartmann is not trying to contribute to "sane-washing" 45 BumRushDaShow Sep 29 #8
NEVER underestimate an enemy! With that said you should already know that Hartmann is the leading progressive yaesu Sep 29 #9
And was also working for RT for 7 years BumRushDaShow Sep 29 #10
Post removed Post removed Sep 29 #13
Bashing a well know progressive? not good. nt yaesu Sep 29 #16
ThomHartman is still a DUer unc70 Sep 29 #21
Who cares? Doesnt immunize him from criticism. oldsoftie Sep 29 #31
"why would ANY storyteller want to confuse their audience. " LiberalLovinLug Sep 29 #49
I guess I shouldve said "anyone except trump"! Because they'll love it regardless. oldsoftie Sep 29 #52
Actually dissing Thom is a russian tatic. That rant is about as old as the bible. nt yaesu Sep 29 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author TwilightZone Sep 29 #24
You weren't here under Obama BumRushDaShow Sep 29 #25
Forgive me if I'm reading you incorrectly, but i disagree that it was wrong for Thom and others to use RT LiberalLovinLug Sep 29 #50
Part of my reasoning to subbing to what was originally XM BumRushDaShow Sep 29 #54
Thanks for the background info. LiberalLovinLug Sep 29 #56
I sub to Mother Jones BumRushDaShow Sep 29 #58
There used to be other left of center choices LiberalLovinLug Sep 29 #60
"the disgraced Bernie Ward" BumRushDaShow Sep 29 #62
"where the likes of an AOC and a Dick Cheney, can agree on the same thing" LiberalLovinLug Sep 29 #65
LOL. According to whom? "Thom" himself? Too many rubles in his bank account to suit me. PSPS Sep 29 #14
He sure gets under your skin, doesn't he? yaesu Sep 29 #17
2 put on my full ignore list in one post, a new record! yaesu Sep 29 #19
Yes asm128 Sep 29 #23
And another propagandist is put on ignore! canuckledragger Sep 29 #27
# 3 on full ignore, thank you!!! yaesu Sep 29 #41
Oh bullshit. He's RAMBLING nothing more. oldsoftie Sep 29 #30
I tend to agree that tRumps brain is too washed up to handle any speaking plan. I mean, he's talking to flies now lol. n yaesu Sep 29 #43
And they STILL cheer oldsoftie Sep 29 #45
No. Hartman is wrong. Tsf is just vomiting idiocy Scrivener7 Sep 29 #37
Hartmann tends to overcomplicate things. TwilightZone Sep 29 #38
I agree with this and I think on this point he's doing just that as tRump could never handle such an intricate plan. nt yaesu Sep 29 #42
Sounds like another form of hypnotism Nasruddin Sep 29 #47
"this is not normal" says a media personality while they continue to treat it as such. PSPS Sep 29 #11
Overcome by his own fumes. Oh the humanity. twodogsbarking Sep 29 #12
Could it be a descendant of the Mike Pence fly? Wicked Blue Sep 29 #18
Wow...there it is...! nickster48 Sep 29 #20
There was no fly. twodogsbarking Sep 29 #22
Forget border wall, America needs to build a dome to keep out flies IronLionZion Sep 29 #26
Biden had one solution BumRushDaShow Sep 29 #39
To be fair angrychair Sep 29 #28
I think he's making a reference to immigrants and insinuating they bring flies with them when they move north to the US jalan48 Sep 29 #29
That makes sense coming from him. His audience is too stupid to grasp it tho oldsoftie Sep 29 #32
I think many Maggots pick up on it honestly. They are really tuned into their racism. jalan48 Sep 29 #35
I guarantee he intended that as a slam on immigrants intrepidity Sep 29 #33
JFC, people vote for this trash? Aviation Pro Sep 29 #34
"Trump was on stage at Prairie du Chien, Wisconsin, making a point about a hat..." BadgerMom Sep 29 #36
Exhausted? Distracted? peggysue2 Sep 29 #40
Trump gets a fly, Bernie got a dove... malthaussen Sep 29 #44
If a small thing has the power to annoy you BWdem4life Sep 29 #46
🪰 IrishAfricanAmerican Sep 29 #48
Dump needs a rapid diaper change Blue Owl Sep 29 #55
"Not normal..." myohmy2 Sep 29 #59
A descendant of Pence's debate fly? IzzaNuDay Sep 29 #61
Good! The fly disguise works! Aussie105 Sep 29 #64
Kick BlueWavePsych Sep 30 #66

Attilatheblond

(4,324 posts)
1. Flies do not get distracted. They know what they like and focus in.
Sun Sep 29, 2024, 10:26 AM
Sep 29

Too bad the GOP ticket pissed off all the 'cat ladies' Them cats? They are great for catching them sky raisins.

yardwork

(64,444 posts)
5. That's true. Our cat keeps the house clear of insects and spiders.
Sun Sep 29, 2024, 11:02 AM
Sep 29

She roams around at night taking care of business.

Attilatheblond

(4,324 posts)
63. Are you old enough to remember the Memorex cassett tape ads? 'Is it live or is it Memorex?'
Sun Sep 29, 2024, 08:48 PM
Sep 29

Maybe some snark memes for sites showing the fly buzzing him: Is he live or is he carrion?

Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)

Response to BaronChocula (Reply #51)

yaesu

(8,248 posts)
7. Thom Hartmann mentioned this technique he thinks tRump is using
Sun Sep 29, 2024, 11:15 AM
Sep 29

What is the petal storytelling technique

The petal structure contains multiple individual stories, which share the same main point, but the stories do not build upon each other. The individual stories can be told and understood separately and can even contain different main characters. But by combining all the stories the message will become stronger.

So, the speaker starts a story but never finishes it & goes on to another, & another unfinished story, something about the brain not able to keep up which makes it easier to drive home the main messages.


yaesu

(8,248 posts)
9. NEVER underestimate an enemy! With that said you should already know that Hartmann is the leading progressive
Sun Sep 29, 2024, 11:27 AM
Sep 29

talk show in the country.

BumRushDaShow

(142,815 posts)
10. And was also working for RT for 7 years
Sun Sep 29, 2024, 11:32 AM
Sep 29
https://www.rt.com/op-ed/authors/thom-hartmann-blog/

(and yes I listened to him on SiriusXM for years - since 2007, my only way to hear him back then)

Response to BumRushDaShow (Reply #10)

 

oldsoftie

(13,538 posts)
31. Who cares? Doesnt immunize him from criticism.
Sun Sep 29, 2024, 12:57 PM
Sep 29

He's giving trump far too much credit for sanity.
The whole theory is nonsense anyway; why would ANY storyteller want to confuse their audience.

LiberalLovinLug

(14,380 posts)
49. "why would ANY storyteller want to confuse their audience. "
Sun Sep 29, 2024, 02:57 PM
Sep 29

Why would any normal campaign want to purposely confuse its audience? They wouldn't. In the case of Trump and his cult its very explainable.

The want to keep them in a state of confusion about what is reality and what is fake. So that they can't believe in anything anymore. And at the same time Trump promotes himself alone as their saviour that will clear up all the confusion they are feeling.

Classic Fascist strategy.

 

oldsoftie

(13,538 posts)
52. I guess I shouldve said "anyone except trump"! Because they'll love it regardless.
Sun Sep 29, 2024, 03:47 PM
Sep 29

Thats why its A CULT

Response to yaesu (Reply #15)

BumRushDaShow

(142,815 posts)
25. You weren't here under Obama
Sun Sep 29, 2024, 12:39 PM
Sep 29

when we dealt with the likes of someone I had also listened to on SiriusXM (before he got a show on MSNBC), and who I admired - Ed Schultz - who like others, got duped. I even had the audacity to listen to and follow Cenk as well. I won't even mention Jill Stein's reception here after the 2016 election and the fundraising for vote counts.

Know your history because it is being repeated again on DU.

LiberalLovinLug

(14,380 posts)
50. Forgive me if I'm reading you incorrectly, but i disagree that it was wrong for Thom and others to use RT
Sun Sep 29, 2024, 03:29 PM
Sep 29

I do not think they were "duped". They knew perfectly well who was giving them a platform. Their only crime, Schultz, Hartmann, Abby Marten, and other left leaning voices, was to knowingly use that tarnished gift of a space and production budget in order to spread truth to power. Because there was no other way to do it, at least very effectively. Air America was long gone. And the Right had gobbled up most of the media space that was left.

Putin purposely funded far left voices, and far right voices at the same time. It was the same strategy of funding Bernie Sanders campaigns in order to make it difficult for Hillary. Or funding the Stein and the Green Party. For Putin, its about destabilization of western democracies. Causing as much division as possible so they are weaker and easier to win against, Not necessarily militarily but economically.

I believe that, at the time at least, Putin opened up RT to any American lefty that wanted to tear down the US system. And right wing and corporate news networks had a vested interest in keeping the corporate status quo. They were never going to give Hartmann or especially someone like Martin, an MSM show of their own. Even Cenk didn't last very long on MSNBC.

So Hartmann and others said.....what the hell, if its our only way to get out more voices from the left, and as long as RT lets us say whatever we want to about the flaws in the US government?.....why not? Why not use RT for their own purposes. I don't think they were duped, and didn't know Putin's purposes. They just came to the conclusion that even if it caused more division to speak truth to right wing power, it couldn't be helped. The need was too great for the country to be able to hear from the other side.

Division is bad, but allowing unchallenged Fascist propaganda to flourish, and a neutered MSM, not having any progressive counter argument going on in the public domain was way worse. They took advantage of the stage offered them to enlighten the masses. And I for one, watched back then, and really really appreciated that they had a place to host their programs. No matter what the host's broader agenda was.

BumRushDaShow

(142,815 posts)
54. Part of my reasoning to subbing to what was originally XM
Sun Sep 29, 2024, 04:47 PM
Sep 29

was to hear those "voices", because they were all but wiped off the radio airwaves here in Philly save for a black talk station (originally WHAT before it changed formats, and later WURD). I was also forced to try to pick up WLIB (at night when the signal was clearer) in NYC for similar reasons.

When black talker and activist Joe Madison left "terrestrial radio" (his show originally syndicated by Cathy Hughes' stations like WOL) I found him on XM when CSPAN did one of their (political) talk radio "simulcast" programs ,where they would broadcast a talker while they were on the air, and had set up shop in XM's studios. When I saw that, I immediately subbed to XM.

I also found XM had the Air America lineup too, so these guys WERE on some other outlet BEFORE RT.

When XM merged with Sirius to become SiriusXM, they eventually combined "America Left" with "Sirius Left" to become "SiriusXM Progress". And there one could hear Rachael, Ed, Randi, Bill Press, Stephanie Miller, and Mark Thompson, etc.

The problem however, was what eventually became a nightmare on DU, with the abject trashing of a Democratic President, much of it precipitated by some of those "voices" (e.g., TYT and others).

It was persistent, unrelenting, and in many cases, obscene. I had an ignore list 5 pages long (about 90% of which were eventually either banned or flagged for review).

It's no different from what has happened to "The Nation" (which I have subscribed to for years, but which has also became Putin-friendly in a pernicious way). I was actually surprised that Joan Walsh, one of my favorites, is working for them.

I.e., the "problem" is not so much Russia and Russians but PUTIN, who wants to go back to the days of despot authoritarianism, and he was already like that back when RT was created (along with Sputnik News).

LiberalLovinLug

(14,380 posts)
56. Thanks for the background info.
Sun Sep 29, 2024, 06:10 PM
Sep 29

The circus and obstacles that were, and still are, in the way for broad air access for millions of Americans to progressive voices.

If I understand you correctly, you had a problem with the fact that a lot of the voices on RT were not only exposing the corrupt right wing dominating corporate oligarchy, but that they didn't stop with Republicans or even someone like Manchin as a D, but they also criticized the top leadership in the Democratic party for bowing too far to corporate interests as well. Including some of the decisions, appointments, by President Obama.

I guess I agreed with a lot of that. Rahm Emanuel appointment for instance was appalling to me. I wish DU was a more welcoming place to be able to discuss those contentious issues, but the "bashing of Democrats" rule is so literally, and strictly adhered to in here that its impossible to have an honest conversation about all that.

But while I didn't like Obama's catering to the corporate right so much, I also understood why. The American political system has devolved into having to raise millions, billions even, just to compete in elections. Its between a rock and a hard place. They need the money to win, but then have to placate the ones that gave them the money to win. At least to a degree. Obama's decision to renege on his promise to not accept super PAC money said it all.

So I could watch say, Abbey Martin, one of the more extreme left voices on RT, and agree with her, but also be pragmatic and understand how difficult it is for Democrats to disconnect from that matrix. And of course, know how much worse the Republicans were. But I still wanted to be well informed, which means the ugly as well as the hopeful

I could self filter, because I wanted to be able to hear informative programs from a liberal point of view, an anti monopolized oligarchic message.......even if they got a little ugly with Democrats as well. And personally, I don't know why we think we are too weak to take it. Even here in DU. In the end, the only choice is the Democratic party for liberals who actually want to get anything done. Flaws and all.

BumRushDaShow

(142,815 posts)
58. I sub to Mother Jones
Sun Sep 29, 2024, 06:55 PM
Sep 29

and did so even before David Corn started working for them.

I have found that I can get the progressive views through some of the news/commentary mags like that (including "The Atlantic" that I sub to).

IOW, I have found myself becoming my mother, who was a voracious reader and radio listener as well as having been the "original" CSPAN junkie.

And just due to my listening to talk radio for almost 50 years, I had witnessed the "transition" to complete RW loonery, particularly once the broadcast outlets were deregulated. I actually heard Rush Limpball's very first show on WABC because he took over the slot of a "liberal" - Lynn Samuels (who eventually became a birther loon). I had listened to many of the 1st and 2nd tier RWers including Michael (Savage) Weiner, Hugh Hewett, Dennis Prager, Mike Gallagher, Glenn BecKKK, etc., and even some on far away stations that I could pick up like Neil Boortz (who was in Atlanta) or David Brudnoy (who was in Boston and who was a Libertarian like Philly local loons Irv Homer and Dom Giordano) - and even someone whose name I just thought of because I haven't heard from in awhile (although he did have a SiriusXM show on the same channel as Joe Madison - "The Power" ) - Armstrong Williams (and just did a search and he is a MAGat through and through)!

IOW, I have seen and heard most of them, left and right, so excuse me if I'm jaded, but we have had too many "demanding the perfect" and willing to "let it all burn down" to make a point (and did in fact help to precipitate that ahead of the 2016 election).

However in 2020, I don't think anyone predicted that Joe Biden, centrist extraordinaire, would eventually become a walking talking Bernie Sanders, but Biden was able to get done what Bernie was unable to do on his own.

LiberalLovinLug

(14,380 posts)
60. There used to be other left of center choices
Sun Sep 29, 2024, 07:53 PM
Sep 29

I used to have my AM radio tuned into KGO in Oakland in the evening to hear Ray Talliaferro. Before that I also listened to the disgraced Bernie Ward. (such a shame). It was kind of fun to hear the end of Gene Burns show, a right wing talk show, and the friendly banter between Ray and Gene in the transition moments before Ray's show. Nice to hear left and right hosts get along back then.

I guess I was in a category of absorbers of information that wanted to know all the faults of both the left and the right. Of Democrats and Republicans. Always with the knowledge from my lifetime of absorption of politics that the Democratic party was the ONLY sane choice.
And IMO the label "purists" could also apply, from a different angle, to Democrats who didn't want to hear any criticism, even if warranted. I never understood that mentality, as I think criticism from the left actually helps. And I think someone like Sanders and now AOC, and other progressives, and any popularity they build, does actually make a difference, and made a difference in Joe Biden's boldness in embracing a more progressive agenda.

Now do some voices go too far at times? Yes. Ana from the TYT is driving me crazy lately with her Biden bashing because of his enabling of Bibi's war machine. She actually said last time I listened to her how Biden has done "nothing". Really?

But there's a danger in demonizing other left of center voices because they are uncomfortably too far over. I think the left eats the left much more voraciously than the right does the right. And because of the uneven playing field in money to buy media platforms and or control the message on them, I have to welcome any and all voices from the left. And rely on my own internal filter to know when to disregard information.


BumRushDaShow

(142,815 posts)
62. "the disgraced Bernie Ward"
Sun Sep 29, 2024, 08:23 PM
Sep 29


That's a blast from the past! I think Limpballs used to bring him on as a "guest host".

I suppose one can add Thomas Sowell in there too (since his name has bubbled up recently).

SiriusXM has a "POTUS" (Politics of the U.S.) channel that is supposedly "middle of the road" and I think that is where people like Michael Smerkonish hang out. I haven't listened to it recently but probably need to check in every once in awhile.

I think the older I get, the more jaded I get and start to see repeat "performances" of certain tactics. I'm a pragmatist and knowing what it takes to get things done within an environment that features huge tidal waves of corporate $$$$ that have impacted everything that we do, it requires a mix of incrementalism AND sheer "jam it through" to get something done and on the books. And trying to finesse that with a pile of misinformation and disinformation being spewed and magnified, is difficult.

Biden was essentially "born" in government and had he still been in the Senate, would have been the most senior member there, having predated ASSley and Turtle (both of them older than Biden). So he knew where the bodies were buried. THAT was the pragmatism.

Of course what was the final reward? A concerted and sustained effort running 24/7, for 3 weeks straight, to beat the living daylights out of him. Someone's idea of a "just punishment" (and it hasn't stopped as nearly every article that is written that mentions him, continues to disparage and harangue him).

But sometimes circumstances can converge into some kind of "perfect storm" where the likes of an AOC and a Dick Cheney, can agree on the same thing.

LiberalLovinLug

(14,380 posts)
65. "where the likes of an AOC and a Dick Cheney, can agree on the same thing"
Sun Sep 29, 2024, 10:35 PM
Sep 29

Strange days indeed

I am also getting older, and I'm understanding pragmatism more as well.

"it requires a mix of incrementalism AND sheer "jam it through" to get something done and on the books."

I am developing patience for incrementalism. I'm talking about the "jam it through" part, not just legislatively, but before that happens, the more extreme left (whatever that means) "jams" into the public sphere, what seem at the time, radical ideas. What?....women voting???

We need the TYTs, The Rational National, Secular Talk, The Majority Report (some YouTube channels I watch).. to jam us in the butt once in awhile with those "purity tests". Poking that slow moving pragmatic beast once in awhile to at least be compelled once in the odd while to make a sudden jump closer to acing the test. Even if perfection is impossible, you still strive towards it.

I think the non stop poking by Bernie Sanders over decades helped move the needle forward quicker on some issues. Some here still have a problem with him. Remaining an Independent might have something to do with that. But it partly paved the way for someone like Harris to be credible. She did support MFA with Bernie at one time. I think she is being pragmatic presently but actually still supports the idea. And that doesn't bother moderates, in either party.

In the same way, on the social media side, I think its healthy to have far left (whatever that means) criticisms of the moderate left. Its all useful. As long as it doesn't become personal. And everyone understands that the final goal is the best, most people helpful, legislation possible, given the balance of seats at the time.

yaesu

(8,248 posts)
41. # 3 on full ignore, thank you!!!
Sun Sep 29, 2024, 01:28 PM
Sep 29

Putin would agree with anyone who hates on Thom Hartmann, that you can take to the bank.

 

oldsoftie

(13,538 posts)
30. Oh bullshit. He's RAMBLING nothing more.
Sun Sep 29, 2024, 12:54 PM
Sep 29

He can't keep track of different stories & "petal storytelling" is nonsense.

yaesu

(8,248 posts)
43. I tend to agree that tRumps brain is too washed up to handle any speaking plan. I mean, he's talking to flies now lol. n
Sun Sep 29, 2024, 01:34 PM
Sep 29

TwilightZone

(28,833 posts)
38. Hartmann tends to overcomplicate things.
Sun Sep 29, 2024, 01:12 PM
Sep 29

I think he's giving Trump too much credit here. Much of what Trump does and says is intentional, but claiming that there's some multi-dimensional psychological basis for it is a bit of a stretch. It's just stream-of-consciousness ranting with talking points thrown in, which are usually things like immigrants = bad. He's appealing to the basis instincts of his followers.

yaesu

(8,248 posts)
42. I agree with this and I think on this point he's doing just that as tRump could never handle such an intricate plan. nt
Sun Sep 29, 2024, 01:32 PM
Sep 29

IronLionZion

(46,997 posts)
26. Forget border wall, America needs to build a dome to keep out flies
Sun Sep 29, 2024, 12:40 PM
Sep 29

and it better be airtight because those flies are really small.

jalan48

(14,430 posts)
29. I think he's making a reference to immigrants and insinuating they bring flies with them when they move north to the US
Sun Sep 29, 2024, 12:53 PM
Sep 29

Aviation Pro

(13,482 posts)
34. JFC, people vote for this trash?
Sun Sep 29, 2024, 01:00 PM
Sep 29
Former President Donald Trump expressed his frustration over a fly that approached his lectern in a bizarre moment during a rally speech. Trump was on stage at Prairie du Chien, Wisconsin, making a point about a hat, when he appeared to get distracted by the creature.

BadgerMom

(2,954 posts)
36. "Trump was on stage at Prairie du Chien, Wisconsin, making a point about a hat..."
Sun Sep 29, 2024, 01:08 PM
Sep 29

Um, forget the fly. This was 100% enough crazy sauce for me. I cannot imagine any non-weird reason for making a point about a hat!

peggysue2

(11,492 posts)
40. Exhausted? Distracted?
Sun Sep 29, 2024, 01:23 PM
Sep 29

No, no. This is THE WEAVE, an oratory device of the greatest brilliance because . . . many people have said so or intellectual genes or massive inspiration or whatever does not conclude the man is suffering cognitive dysfunction.

The man is suffering cognitive dysfunction, so blatantly obvious that it's horrifying that anyone would deem Trump a fit candidate for anything.

But here we are. It's up to the American voter now to prevent the country turning into an insane asylum.







Aussie105

(6,311 posts)
64. Good! The fly disguise works!
Sun Sep 29, 2024, 10:29 PM
Sep 29

It is actually a miniature drone, the same one that was sent out to check if Pence's hair was real or some sort of plastic skull cap.

This time it was sent out to crawl into Trump's ear to see if there is a brain in there.

But the search mission was aborted as soon as Trump spotted it.

(Need I add JOKE to that?)

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»'Not normal': Social medi...