A series of polls from highly-rated AtlasIntel showed Trump ahead in 5 of the 7 key swing states
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by Omaha Steve (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).
Source: AtlasIntel
Sunday, September 29. A slightly better day for Trump than Harris because of.a series of polls from highly-rated AtlasIntel, which showed Trump ahead in 5 of the 7 key swing states though in contrast to some recent data, the polls had Harris doing better in the Sun Belt than the Rust Belt. With a lot of recent state polling, though, the impact on the forecast is relatively minor.
In other news, Silver Bulletin is now classifying Rasmussen Reports as an intrinsically partisan (GOP) pollster because of a credible report of explicit coordination with the Trump campaign, including leaked emails encouraging the Trump campaign to pay for its polls via third-party sponsors. This is way out of line for any pollster that could plausibly be called non-partisan. However, this doesnt have much impact on the model because Rasmussen already had a strong GOP-leaning house effect that the model was accounting for.
Read more: https://atlasintel.org/poll/usa-swing-states-2024-09-28
I don't understand AtlasIntel. It is supposed to be a highly rated poll and everything defies logic. It was the most accurate pollster in 2020. If AtlasIntel is correct, our nation is screwed.
I highly doubt this to be accurate. Maybe, in 2024, AtlasIntel will be least accurate.
By the way, I am just reporting the polls. Don't shoot the messenger.
yardwork
(64,318 posts)You were shown evidence, and yet here you are back again pushing this.
There's a word for that.
arlyellowdog
(1,429 posts)Oh and from South America. I think its highly rated because it predicted some European election. Not gonna worry about that.
Lovie777
(14,993 posts)Nikossitti
(313 posts)Has her ahead in all swings except tied in Georgia. Atlas-shmatlas.
Abnredleg
(933 posts)and NYT/Siena has her up by 4 in PA
brush
(57,471 posts)TwilightZone
(28,833 posts)I'm not sure why you're insisting otherwise.
"I highly doubt this to be accurate."
Then, don't post it. Problem solved. If you think it's junk, why would you post it here?
ZonkerHarris
(25,268 posts)hlthe2b
(106,328 posts)discussed in detail--they merely state they use "scientific method..." Oh, brother.
Granted I have not downloaded their entire database, not wanting to risk malware. But, it isn't even clear if this is Registered or Likely Voters...
LearnedHand
(4,032 posts)Ive never heard of them and couldnt find any useful About Us info on their site, so I looked them up on Media Bias Factcheck.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/atlasintel-polling-bias-and-credibility/
Also, Michael Podhorzer had a fascinating article about the difference between election polling and election modeling. Its very dense but extremely useful to learn how to apply critical thinking hygiene when reading about this election.
https://open.substack.com/pub/michaelpodhorzer/p/kamala-harris-will-win-the-popular
jmbar2
(6,088 posts)Omaha Steve
(103,442 posts)Polls are analysis. This can be posted in GD.
Statement of Purpose
Post the latest news from reputable mainstream news websites and blogs. Important news of national interest only. No analysis or opinion pieces. No duplicates. News stories must have been published within the last 12 hours. Use the published title of the story as the title of the discussion thread.