'Hard to imagine a candidate more unworthy': NYT dumps on Trump as it endorses Harris
Source: raw story
Brad Reed September 30, 2024 7:46AM ET
In the very first line of its endorsement of Harris, the Times argued that "it is hard to imagine a candidate more unworthy to serve as president of the United States than Donald Trump."
The editors then went on to document Trump's assorted moral and ethical failures.
"He has proved himself morally unfit for an office that asks its occupant to put the good of the nation above self-interest," they wrote. "He has proved himself temperamentally unfit for a role that requires the very qualities wisdom, honesty, empathy, courage, restraint, humility, discipline that he most lacks. Those disqualifying characteristics are compounded by everything else that limits his ability to fulfill the duties of the president: his many criminal charges, his advancing age, his fundamental lack of interest in policy and his increasingly bizarre cast of associates."
The editors argued that this lengthy list of disqualifying characteristics by itself should be enough for voters to support Harris's campaign, but they also made an affirmative case for the vice president as well.....................................
Read more: https://www.rawstory.com/kamala-harris-nyt-endorsement/
Link to tweet
SamKnause
(13,847 posts)Where have you been the last 9 years ???
Every newspaper in this country should have endorsed Hillary.
Did they ??? NO !!!
Every newspaper should have endorsed Biden.
Did they ??? NO !!!
Every newspaper today should be endorsing Kamala.
Have they ??? NO !!!
Fuck you and your both sides bullshit !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
JohnSJ
(96,719 posts)so much that endorsement meant very little
Both sides bullshit.
marble falls
(62,392 posts)BeyondGeography
(40,042 posts)displacedvermoter
(3,140 posts)they have yet to interview voters?
Fiendish Thingy
(18,654 posts)Despite her rumoured mental disability, NYT editorial board endorses Harris.
ArkansasDemocrat1
(3,213 posts)They whored themselves out for clicks.
Biglinda 52
(87 posts)Is no longer relevant as is any legacy media ever since they fired all their journalists and focused on the bottom line.
FakeNoose
(35,885 posts)usonian
(14,284 posts)Like Helene. Hard to ignore, but they did for a damn long time.
Now comes the fault-finding.
Times research staff is busy reading the Daily Caller for facts, no doubt.
Novara
(6,115 posts)BaronChocula
(2,519 posts)his serial transgressions as individual events in a vacuum, with kid gloves, unrelated to a damaged and dangerous psyche that continues to loom as a threat to the country.