CBS News says it will be up to Vance and Walz to fact-check each other in veep debate
This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by Emile (a host of the Latest Breaking News forum).
Source: Ap News
CBS News, hosting vice presidential candidates JD Vance and Tim Walz for the general election campaigns third debate next week, says it will be up to the politicians not the moderators to check the facts of their opponents. The 90-minute debate, scheduled for 9 p.m. Eastern on Tuesday in a Manhattan studio that once hosted the childrens program Captain Kangaroo, will be moderated by the outgoing CBS Evening News anchor Norah ODonnell and Face the Nation host Margaret Brennan.
During ABCs debate between presidential contenders Kamala Harris and Donald Trump earlier this month, network moderators on four occasions pointed out inaccurate statements by Trump, and none by Harris. That infuriated the former president and his supporters, who complained it was unfair. Last spring, CNN moderators did not question any facts presented by Trump and President Joe Biden in the debate where Bidens poor performance eventually led to him dropping out of the race.
On Friday, CBS said the onus will be on Vance and Walz to point out misstatements by the other, and that the moderators will facilitate those opportunities during rebuttal time. The network said its own misinformation unit, CBS News Confirmed, will provide real-time fact-checking during the debate on its live blog and on social media, and on the air during post-debate analysis. With its plans, CBS News is clearly indicating it wants to take a step back from the heat generated by calling attention to misleading statements by candidates. Some argue that offstage fact-checking is too little, too late and not seen by many people who watch the event.
Its not the first time
Angie Drobnic Holan, director of the international fact-checking network at the Poynter Institute, said she has seen examples of moderators who have successfully encouraged candidates to keep their opponents honest. Ill be interested in seeing how this works in practice, she said. Having said that, youre basically off-loading one of your journalistic responsibilities onto the candidates themselves, so I dont think that its ideal. It takes journalistic courage to be willing to fact-check the candidates, because the candidates are absolutely going to complain about it. I dont think the moderators first goal is to avoid controversy. During the ABC debate, moderators David Muir and Linsey Davis corrected Trump statements on abortion, the 2020 election, crime statistics and reports that immigrants in Ohio were eating pets.
Read more: https://apnews.com/article/cbs-debate-vice-president-fact-check-7a3b31c98ab092dd44915df57a359d10
Sucha NastyWoman
(2,901 posts)Clouds Passing
(2,357 posts)-misanthroptimist
(1,196 posts)I mean, they get just as much out of not doing it, so what's their motivation? /2
SunSeeker
(53,790 posts)Scrivener7
(52,881 posts)Bristlecone
(10,494 posts)Vance will insult, lie, accuse, not answer any direct questions, etc etc etc.
Emile
(30,076 posts)Statement of Purpose for LBN
Post the latest news from reputable mainstream news websites and blogs. Important news of national interest only. No analysis or opinion pieces. No duplicates. News stories must have been published within the last 12 hours. Use the published title of the story as the title of the discussion thread.