Trump won't have to respond to bombshell Smith filing until after election
Source: Salon
Published October 3, 2024 8:38PM (EDT)
Former President Donald Trump will not have to respond to special counsel Jack Smiths massive recent filing in the ongoing election interference case against him until after the election, a judge ruled on Thursday.
Smith's Wednesday filing exposed a multitude of accusations against the former president and alleged extensive attempts to interfere with the transfer of power from the Trump administration to that of President Joe Biden. D.C. judge Tanya Chutkan granted the ex-presidents motion to delay a response to that filing in part, denying an ask for a late-November response date but pushing the required response date until November 7.
The case was already delayed by months earlier this year when the Supreme Court agreed to hear the issue of presidential immunity in the case, ultimately handing down a sweeping ruling that sent Smith back to the drawing board. Smiths office filed a superseding indictment in August with the revised charges, framing Trumps plot to steal the 2020 election as the actions of a private citizen, not those taken in his capacity as president.
A trial was already out of the question before the election, but the scheduling decision makes it all but certain that Smiths will be the final word in the case before voters cast their ballots.
Read more: https://www.salon.com/2024/10/03/wont-have-to-respond-to-bombshell-smith-filing-until-after/?in_brief=true
Enter stage left
(3,834 posts)Wednesdays
(20,315 posts)Last paragraph concludes:
"...makes it all but certain that Smiths will be the final word in the case before voters cast their ballots."
Enter stage left
(3,834 posts)That could make the difference in the election.
BumRushDaShow
(143,952 posts)I don't know if you have actually looked at any of it.
Here is a link (PDF) - https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.258149/gov.uscourts.dcd.258149.252.0.pdf
onenote
(44,785 posts)Trump's already was subject to a deadline to respond to Smith's filing -- not to the redactions but to the substance of the filing -- on October 17. He sought a five week extension of that deadline until November 21. Judge Chutkan gave him a 3 week extension until November 7. But that extension is unrelated to the deadline to file objections to the redactions in the appendix and does not in any way prevent Judge Chutkan from ruling on those objections, if any are filed, in the same prompt manner she responded to the objections to the redactions in the brief.
BumRushDaShow
(143,952 posts)The trial wasn't going to happen before the election anyway and as the OP article excerpt notes - Smith "would have the final word" before the election.
Ocelot II
(121,374 posts)No challenge to Smiths argument until then!
bullimiami
(13,996 posts)We need him losing this election and in court.
Ocelot II
(121,374 posts)until after the election. Eeeexcellent!!!!
Polybius
(18,272 posts)He'll fire Smith.
LeftInTX
(30,488 posts)If he wins, speed up the process by 100 times.
JohnSJ
(96,798 posts)Lets prove them wrong.
thesquanderer
(12,393 posts)He'd have no power until January 20, 2025. Until then, he's still just a private citizen, with no influence on the justice department, etc..
Ferrets are Cool
(21,984 posts)ZonkerHarris
(25,396 posts)Bengus81
(7,481 posts)When he gets smoked on 11/5 then it will be GAME ON like Trump has never seen. That's when all the shit against him and the convictions get real.