Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(142,233 posts)
Fri Oct 4, 2024, 03:04 AM Oct 4

Trump moves to toss Jan. 6 obstruction charges, citing Supreme Court ruling

Source: Reuters

October 3, 2024 5:32 PM EDT Updated 10 hours ago


WASHINGTON, Oct. 3 (Reuters) - Donald Trump on Thursday urged a federal judge to toss out two obstruction charges central to the case that the former U.S. president illegally sought to overturn his 2020 election defeat, citing a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling raising the legal bar for those offenses.

Lawyers for Trump, the Republican presidential candidate, argued in a court filing that the Supreme Court's ruling requires U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan to dismiss charges accusing Trump of corruptly obstructing an official proceeding – the congressional certification of his loss to Democrat Joe Biden on Jan. 6, 2021 – and conspiring to do so.

Trump is also seeking the dismissal of the two other charges in the indictment on other grounds. Trump has pleaded not guilty to a four-count indictment accusing him of a multi-part conspiracy to block the collection of votes and certification of his election defeat.

Trump's argument is based on 6-3 Supreme Court decision in June, in which the justices sided with a criminal defendant charged under the same obstruction law who was accused of taking part in the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol. The court found that defendants charged under the law must have acted to impair “the availability or integrity" of documents or other records related to an official proceeding - or attempted to do so.

Read more: https://www.reuters.com/legal/trump-moves-toss-jan-6-obstruction-charges-citing-supreme-court-ruling-2024-10-03/

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump moves to toss Jan. 6 obstruction charges, citing Supreme Court ruling (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Oct 4 OP
Is this considered trump's response to Smith's recent filing? Think. Again. Oct 4 #1
This Was A "Lawyers for Trump" Filing n/t DallasNE Oct 4 #2
Wait, are "Lawyers for trump" different than "trump's Lawyers"? Think. Again. Oct 4 #3
I Confused "Save America Leadership PAC" DallasNE Oct 5 #4

Think. Again.

(17,928 posts)
1. Is this considered trump's response to Smith's recent filing?
Fri Oct 4, 2024, 03:36 AM
Oct 4

If so, It seems obvious the trump legal team is down to just grasping at straws since there is no question trump's actions were indeed an 'attempt to impair “the availability or integrity" of documents or other records related to an official proceeding' because votes are obviously "documents or other records".

But I guess they're just applying the delay tactic again.

DallasNE

(7,557 posts)
4. I Confused "Save America Leadership PAC"
Sat Oct 5, 2024, 02:41 PM
Oct 5

With Lawyers for Trump as the PAC name that supports Trump separately from his political PAC that pays most of his legal expenses. To me, it is confusing and odd to phrase it "lawyers for Trump" rather than "Trump's lawyers" if they did not want to call them by name.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Trump moves to toss Jan. ...