New rule could allow election skeptics on Georgia county election boards to exclude decisive votes
Source: Salon
Published October 7, 2024 9:14AM (EDT)
An examination of a new election rule in Georgia passed by the states Republican-controlled election board suggests that local officials in just a handful of rural counties could exclude enough votes to affect the outcome of the presidential race.
The rule was backed by national groups allied with former President Donald Trump. It gives county boards the power to investigate irregularities and exclude entire precincts from the vote totals they certify. Supporters of the rule, most of whom are Republicans, say its necessary to root out fraud. Critics, most of whom are Democrats, say it can be used as a tool to disenfranchise select buckets of voters.
An analysis by ProPublica shows that counties wouldnt have to toss out many precincts to tip the election if its as close as it was in 2020, when Trump lost Georgia by less than 12,000 votes. Based on tallies from that year, an advantage of about 8,000 Democratic votes could be at risk in just 12 precincts in three counties under the new rule, the analysis found. There are 159 counties in Georgia.
A judge is expected to decide soon whether the rule will stand.
Read more: https://www.salon.com/2024/10/07/new-rule-could-allow-skeptics-on-georgia-county-boards-to-exclude-decisive-votes_partner/
CrispyQ
(38,244 posts)OMG, I hate these people. I literally hate them. And I don't feel bad one damned bit about hating them.
Fiendish Thingy
(18,510 posts)Under the Electoral Count Reform Act, unresolved candidate challenges go to a panel of three federal judges, who must rule before the safe harbor date in December.
If the partisan elections board tries any shenanigans, and the state courts dont rule fairly or timely, Harris can challenge and take her chances with the feds.
Sogo
(5,768 posts)nt
maxsolomon
(35,048 posts)That would take a Constitutional Amendment.
Bayard
(24,145 posts)How many times does the proof need to be shoved up these people's noses? There will be fraud if allowed to disenfranchise a bunch of voters.
Marthe48
(19,009 posts)to disenfranchise voters in free and fair elections
I had to fix that headline.
Why is stupid allowed to run the country into the ground?
bluestarone
(18,224 posts)Kemp and the whole fucking Georgia SC. Can a federal judge do anything to protect votes??
mdbl
(5,477 posts)So lets cancel them out.
wiggs
(8,040 posts)planted evidence, friendly 'reporters.' They've done all that before.
PortTack
(34,643 posts)Last edited Sat Oct 12, 2024, 03:09 AM - Edit history (1)
maxsolomon
(35,048 posts)Don't hold your breath.
PortTack
(34,643 posts)But that .charges are being brought
maxsolomon
(35,048 posts)So goes the saying.
Peters is among the few actually convicted and sentenced to prison, and I doubt she's IN prison yet. It's been nearly 4 years.