Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(144,204 posts)
Sat Oct 19, 2024, 03:41 AM Oct 19

New evidence unsealed of how Trump's Jan. 6, 2021 rally was funded

Source: USA Today

Published 2:45 p.m. ET Oct. 18, 2024 | Updated 5:12 p.m. ET Oct. 18, 2024


WASHINGTON – A trove of new records released in the federal election-interference case against former President Donald Trump described how money was spent on Trump's "Stop the Steal" rally near the White House on Jan. 6, 2021.

The revelations were among 1,900 pages of evidence for federal charges against Trump that he tried to steal the 2020 election. The evidence also includes details of how his supporters spent election night at the White House and how Trump reacted to the riot at the Capitol.

U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan is weighing the evidence to determine whether Trump is immune to federal charges, based on a Supreme Court ruling in July.

Trump, the Republican presidential nominee, opposed the release less than three weeks before the election as an example of prosecutors publishing “cherry-picked materials” that “would prejudice potential jurors and endanger potential witnesses” three weeks before the election. But Chutkan ruled that keeping the documents confidential could also be considered election interference.

Read more: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/10/18/donald-trump-election-interference-case-new-evidence/75714784007/

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New evidence unsealed of how Trump's Jan. 6, 2021 rally was funded (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Oct 19 OP
The republicons who betrayed America deserve justice BoRaGard Oct 19 #1
Follow the money. multigraincracker Oct 19 #2
"stop the steal" trusty elf Oct 19 #3
"Make coal-mining great again" is his intellectual zenith. Cue the LBJ quote. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Oct 19 #4
Please let Ginni Thomas' name be in there! hoosierspud Oct 19 #5
Same ArkansasDemocrat1 Oct 19 #8
Unlikely,but how about Elaine Chao.. BattleRow Oct 19 #13
this is my prayer. mahina Oct 19 #10
if it doesn't show up on paper mdbl Oct 19 #11
Aiding and abetting an insurrection is not within the protected acts of a President. cstanleytech Oct 19 #6
K & R bookmarked FakeNoose Oct 19 #7
"...and endanger potential witnesses" say what? Pacifist Patriot Oct 19 #9
I also see his lawyers laying the groundwork moniss Oct 19 #12
When Donnie says 'election interference' he means HIS election bucolic_frolic Oct 19 #14
The release means verlittle if its not Figarosmom Oct 19 #15
There were a couple thousand pages released BumRushDaShow Oct 19 #16
I hope so but Figarosmom Oct 19 #17
Well after January 6 BumRushDaShow Oct 19 #18

BattleRow

(1,256 posts)
13. Unlikely,but how about Elaine Chao..
Sat Oct 19, 2024, 04:41 PM
Oct 19

Mitch McConnells wife?

Btw,they are both childless..wonder if they have cats?

mahina

(19,043 posts)
10. this is my prayer.
Sat Oct 19, 2024, 01:44 PM
Oct 19

oh please oh please oh please let it be made public, as we all know it occurred.

cstanleytech

(27,178 posts)
6. Aiding and abetting an insurrection is not within the protected acts of a President.
Sat Oct 19, 2024, 11:34 AM
Oct 19

If it was we would have a King in power over a century ago.

moniss

(6,150 posts)
12. I also see his lawyers laying the groundwork
Sat Oct 19, 2024, 03:44 PM
Oct 19

for their bought and paid for MAGA controlled Supreme Court to toss any convictions. Of course it won't be correct legally, ethically etc. but these MAGA justices and ones before them like Scalia and Rehnquist aren't about whether anything is legally correct or ethical as we have all seen. If they want something they will pronounce it upon the people as the evil, obsessed prick Leonard Leo congratulates them.

bucolic_frolic

(47,588 posts)
14. When Donnie says 'election interference' he means HIS election
Sat Oct 19, 2024, 04:59 PM
Oct 19

When a U.S. Judge says it, it means OUR election - the whole country's outcome.

Private interests vs. the public good.

Figarosmom

(3,297 posts)
15. The release means verlittle if its not
Sat Oct 19, 2024, 05:36 PM
Oct 19

Covered by the news shows including local evening news.Even this post didn't post any paragraphs having to do with the funding as the title implies. I will have to go to the link. So I wonder will there actually be any new info at the link? The media is failing us again and I am becoming fearful that all this failure and tricks ( flooding of polls with trump ahead bs to stymie the vote) will work.


On edit; the article does give amounts and names of otganizations.

BumRushDaShow

(144,204 posts)
16. There were a couple thousand pages released
Sat Oct 19, 2024, 06:08 PM
Oct 19

so I expect the investigative journalists are combing through it to eventually do a big expose thing. The others might be scanning through the pages to find some unredacted other info that has more detail for stuff previously reported or speculated about.

BumRushDaShow

(144,204 posts)
18. Well after January 6
Sat Oct 19, 2024, 07:24 PM
Oct 19

it took awhile, but outlets like WaPo had some fancy HTML formatting, dynamic pages, and video montages to go with an in-depth narrative and walk-through for what happened - https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/interactive/2021/jan-6-insurrection-capitol/?itid=sf_national-security_jan-6-insurrection_pulitzer_p008_f001

I.e., there are some who will eventually "dive in" with the hope of getting a Pulitzer one day.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»New evidence unsealed of ...