Washington Post publisher takes blame for non-endorsement debacle
Source: Salon
Published October 26, 2024 4:32PM (EDT)
The publisher of the Washington Post is running defense for owner Jeff Bezos, after the paper's decision not to endorse a candidate in this year's presidential election caused an uproar.
Will Lewis took responsibility for the highly criticized decision to end the outlet's decades-long tradition of endorsement. In a Saturday morning statement to CNN, Lewis defended Bezos from reports that the billionaire interfered with the papers planned endorsement of Kamala Harris.
Reporting around the role of The Washington Post owner and the decision not to publish a presidential endorsement has been inaccurate, Lewis said. He was not sent, did not read and did not opine on any draft.
The carefully worded statement notes only that Bezos' role was inaccurately described. The statement runs against one put out by the Post's union, which claimed doesn't completely conflict with the Posts own reporting, where sources with knowledge of the decision to not endorse laid the blame on Bezos.
Read more: https://www.salon.com/2024/10/26/washington-post-publisher-takes-for-non-endorsement-debacle/?in_brief=true
RockRaven
(16,283 posts)Baitball Blogger
(48,065 posts)NotHardly
(1,182 posts)Polybius
(17,850 posts)That's enough to make him the 2nd richest man in the world.
LisaM
(28,607 posts)I have a friend (who's a journalist and who's cancelled her WaPo subscription) who also describes herself as having an Amazon addiction.
I think Amazon is more habit-forming than addictive (unless of course you have a shopping addiction) but I have more left leaning friends right now who are self-righteously cancelling their Washington Posts subscriptions but would likely never entertain the idea of cancelling their Prime subscriptions than I
would care to count. They'd find some justification.
Polybius
(17,850 posts)Sometimes I need something hyper-fast that's not available locally, such as a specific Halloween costume by Thursday. Amazon Prime is my only option.
LisaM
(28,607 posts)(I assume I was not supposed to treat that as a serious complaint). "Wink, wink!"
Zilli
(286 posts)I can find almost anything I want to buy elsewhere and I don't care one bit about prime. I have eBay, free shipping joy and will do all i can to avoid anything Bezos.
LisaM
(28,607 posts)Granted, I live in Seattle, which was an early victim of the peculiar desolation Amazon brings to a city, but I simply don't get the appeal of shopping online (unless it's necessary) versus the joy of physically going into a space and handling things like plates or hats or books or linens before deciding whether I want them.
Zilli
(286 posts)I would rather shop in person, but like many people who do not have transportation and take the bus everywhere or have mobility issues or both, online shopping works. This situation is about just getting what is needed without supporting awful people
LisaM
(28,607 posts)I still do it. I walk to the grocery store and take the bus home (even though I get PTSD at the bus stop, where I was attacked once). I don't have mobility issues, but I am getting older, and I am technically a senior now!
Seattle has made it nearly impossible to shop using transit and downtown is essentially gone, but my larger point is, how did this happen? I used to have a good bus that took me within a block of three different grocery stores. Now one of the stores is gone (ironically replaced by a light rail stop), one is Whole Foods which I now boycott because it's Amazon, and the third one I can no longer get to from downtown on one bus. A 29-minute trip on one bus turned into a 55-minute trip on two buses and Metro defends it and actually argued with me online about the time difference.
I don't understand why consumers knowingly made shopping in person more difficult. It was easy. Now it's hard. Why?
ShazzieB
(18,680 posts)People who shop online do so because they find it convenient, and it works for them. It's really that simple.
I doubt it even occurs to the vast majority of folks that ordering something online might adversely affect the ability to shop in person in some localities. That possibility honestly never entered my own mind until I read your posts in this thread. I'm sorry to hear about what's happened in your area. I imagine the impacts are different in different places, but unless someone lives in such an affected place, they wouldn't know.
Personally, I haven't noticed the kind of differences you describe where I live, with the exception of bookstores. Amazon has had an undeniable impact there. There is no shortage of places to shop for other things, however, and grocery stores abound around here.
As for Amazon, I don't like Jeff Bezos any better than the next person, believe me. But the fact is, Amazon is very successful, because it does what it does extremely well, and as long as that continues to be the case, it will continue to make money for its owner. If I were to personally decide not to use Amazon anymore, I'm sure it wouldn't affect Bezos' bottom line one iota; but it would have definite negative impacts on me that I will not go into.
I guess I'd say I'm a bit jaded about my personal ability to affect the bottom line of any billionaire. Also, if I tried to boycott every single large corporation that has business practices I don't agree with or supports causes I dont support, I honestly don't know what would be left. I admire people who are willing to make that effort, and I used to be one of them, but the older I get, the harder I find it to make personal sacrifices for noble reasons. (That's just where I am right now; I'm not advocating that others adopt the same approach.)
In the end, we're all just trying to survive in a tough world, and we all have to do what we're able to do and what works for us personally. Those factors are going to be different for each individual. I would never judge anyone else's choices in that respect, and I don't need anyone else's approval for my own, including the fact that using Amazon for certain things works well for me.
LisaM
(28,607 posts)Things I like have been systematically taken away from me. Because other people like shopping online, my own options have been narrowed.
I also liked living in a city with a bustling downtown. Now I don't. And I hate that it's this way.
Online shopping also takes money out of the local economy. Small business owners feel it. It's pretty much impossible to sustain a small business now.
Rocknation
(44,883 posts)Here's what I think he's worried about: Trump losing by such a wide margin that having endorsed him would undermine his image as an alpha businessman. I also suspect that Bezos has proof positive that the odds are highly in favor of such an outcome. At the very least, it would explain why he is "equally" uninterested in endorsing Trump!
Rocknation
Rocknation
(44,883 posts)"Proof positive" accomplished?
USA Today.com: Democrat Kamala Harris has a sweeping lead over Republican Donald Trump -- among voters who have already cast their ballots, that is...(T)hey say by 63%-33% that they support Democratic congressional candidates.
Rocknation
Response to RockRaven (Reply #1)
Post removed
CTyankee
(65,041 posts)It may interest you to know that not a few DUers consider that word offensive to women.
I have been given to understand that Americans tend to find the word more offensive than people in some other English-speaking countries. However, DU is a US based website, so imo, it makes sense for American sensibilities to prevail here.
In other words, the C-word is out of place here at DU.
COL Mustard
(6,889 posts)And wasn't on the jury either. I'd have voted for exile.
CTyankee
(65,041 posts)It just says "post removed." That means no other action was taken at this time.
People aren't usually banned for one infraction, unless it's something extremely egregious, which this wasn't.
There is a very small number of repeat offenders who sign up over and over under a new name, after being banned under the last one. MIRT has gotten very good at keeping track of those people and eliminating them when they make a reappearance. If you see someone getting banned after only one or 2 posts, it's usually one of those people, or someone who was an obvious troll for other reasons.
IbogaProject
(3,655 posts)But that doesn't exclude him forbidding endorsing Harris.
malthaussen
(17,672 posts)... which we already knew from his failure to endorse anybody.
-- Mal
DENVERPOPS
(9,958 posts)for the gipper.............
pat_k
(10,879 posts)"He was not sent, did not read and did not opine on any draft.
You don' t need to see a draft to put the kibosh on an endorsement you know is in the works.
SunSeeker
(53,674 posts)jaxexpat
(7,794 posts)There's a lot less intelligence to insult since the Reagan era, you know. The PTB have juggled our thoughts with input designed to titillate our attention for so many decades now that we salivate on command, even our outrage is pre-programmed with its own canned laugh-track. Reality schmeality*, PBS or Fox, take your pick. They're all in the same memo loop.
* Another term I just now coined for your entertainment and the enrichment of my brand. Not sure what it means but, these days, the pretention alone will make it memorable if not salable.
Just so there's little or no confusion, some of the preceding may have been unsuitable for some readers. please find this smilie
patphil
(6,960 posts)The editor did Bezos' bidding and took the heat for it.
moniss
(5,755 posts)it is likely that after a few months everybody in the media looking to sell their soul for a job will be talking up Will Lewis as being a highly respected figure in journalism.
jaxexpat
(7,794 posts)ConstanceCee
(333 posts)I cancelled my WP subscription of 42 years when Will Lewis was hired. I miss what it used to be.
Maeve
(42,961 posts)Although I am not sure where one ends and the other takes over....
And yeah, I canceled my subscription as soon as I read Lewis' first announcement
Blues Heron
(6,134 posts)GusBob
(7,535 posts)Will Im going broke, get out there a carefully worded kiss my ass
niyad
(119,970 posts)phone hacking scandal.
mpcamb
(2,972 posts)33taw
(2,816 posts)modrepub
(3,614 posts)F-ing coward. Well, like usual, its up to the little people to do the dirty work and stand up for themselves.
In honor of Bezos, I'll cut and paste this gem.
Brave Sir Robin ran away.
Bravely ran away away.
When danger reared it's ugly head,
He bravely turned his tail and fled.
Yes, brave Sir Robin turned about
And gallantly he chickened out.
Swiftly taking to his feet,
He beat a very brave retreat.
Bravest of the brave, Sir Robin!
jvill
(361 posts)wolfie001
(3,650 posts)He worked for Mordoch while the Brit phone-tap scandal was in full bloom.
wolfie001
(3,650 posts)Pure and simple. Maybe from a catamaran or a sub-orbital airplane while getting a HJ.
underpants
(186,681 posts)wolfie001
(3,650 posts)Miles Archer
(18,960 posts)I really don't care about ANY OF THIS.
The short version is THE WASHINGTON POST made the decision. Now, NO...I don't believe you should tell Eugene Robinson or any of their fine reporters to get bent.
But it was an EXECUTIVE DECISION.
Remember CHRIS LICHT at CNN, who went down in flames after Trump's "Town Hall?"
Licht was a SACRIFICIAL LAMB. Warner CEO David Zaslav and his radical right billionaire boy pal John Malone were the architects for turning CNN into Fox Lite. Licht just followed orders and took the fall.
I could GIVE A FUCK about Bezos' "image." It's his paper. He needs to carry AT LEAST A PORTION OF THE WEIGHT for this.
Dem4life1970
(439 posts)The Washington Post is now in serious financial trouble.and has lost significant credibility.
ArkansasDemocrat1
(3,213 posts)I'd trust the Weekly World News before them. What happened to Bat-Boi anyway?
Prairie_Seagull
(3,781 posts)BULLSHIT!!!!
imo.
AmericanBot
(13 posts)[img][/img]
BattleRow
(1,198 posts)SunSeeker
(53,674 posts)republianmushroom
(17,670 posts)The Washington Posts outgoing editor-at-large and longtime columnist has made explosive claims that its owner Jeff Bezos struck a deal with Donald Trump in order to kill the newspapers endorsement of Kamala Harris.
Read more: https://www.thedailybeast.com/ex-washington-post-editor-robert-kagan-this-is-a-straight-jeff-bezos-donald-trump-quid-pro-quo/
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143328986
ThreeNoSeep
(171 posts)by resigning.
I cancelled my subscription until Bezos makes a new decision or the publisher leaves, and they make a Harris endorsement.
One hypothesis I toy with to explain such a blatant cowardly move is as follows:
Perhaps Bezos ran a sim/prediction model to determine the best strategic response to the variety of outcomes that could emerge from this election, and this capitulation was the least worst choice, given a Kamala win or a Trump win. In the lead up, the non endorsement provides the editorial side the outraged impetus to continue making quality reports in the face of an embarrassing abandonment of past endorsements. If (when!) Kamala wins, the WP could eventually recover the lost trust with heir leadership through new subscribers and returning former subscribers. If Trump wins, Bezos' government interests/entanglements can survive the coming years of fascism.
BradBo
(648 posts)Bev54
(11,917 posts)take questions like why the same day his executives were meeting with Trump? I hate cowards who do not take responsibility and I hate rich cowards even more.
SunSeeker
(53,674 posts)NotHardly
(1,182 posts)TBF
(34,320 posts)I will find a replacement for Kindle. There's got to be a way I can just read on my iPhone.
verargert
(141 posts)Lewis said. He was not sent, did not read and did not opine on any draft.
Did not write 'he did not call'
SunSeeker
(53,674 posts)This was Bezos' call.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(115,366 posts)BlueKota
(3,661 posts)Blue Horizon was pure coincidence? 😒🙄
They need to remember there are some us left, who still have a functioning brain, and working bullshit detectors.
Beartracks
(13,576 posts)... then this could be true. You can't receive, read, or opine about a draft that never got written.
But you most certainly CAN opine about - and squash - the endorsement itself before there's a draft.
==========
Rocknation
(44,883 posts)Last edited Mon Nov 4, 2024, 12:54 PM - Edit history (2)
Well, if an order not to endorse anyone came down on WaPo before a draft even existed, then congratulations, Lewis -- you've made Bezos look even worse!!! At least, logic dictates that the "Washington Post owner" Lewis is referring to is Bezos...since Lewis dared not speak his name...
Rocknation
SunSeeker
(53,674 posts)mdbl
(5,488 posts)BootinUp
(49,036 posts)toad-eye
(39 posts)I do most of the shopping for our house.
Because I'm good at it, have excellent recall, and save us a ton.
We are on SS.
Amazon is convenient. (next day delivery free {for a price})
But I will look elsewhere and only shop amazon if I can't find it elsewhere.
Join me!
BootinUp
(49,036 posts)FakeNoose
(35,702 posts)That's how Bezos could afford all those brand new snazzy Prime delivery vans. We paid for those with our Prime membership that keeps going up every year.
Easterncedar
(3,532 posts)The publisher complains of inaccurate reporting. Say what?
brush
(57,575 posts)to the publiser.
AZLD4Candidate
(6,285 posts)aurora the great
(104 posts)Just cancelled my subscription to Amazon. This is no token gesture. We use Amazon for many small but repetitive purchases. It expedites the materials I need for my part time business. We used to watch Prime a lot. But when I look back to last series we were following they have ended or were cancelled so no loss there. Here's the kicker my husband works for one of the Amazon Fulfillment centers. We were supposed to get the services for free but we never did. So here goes its been good to know ya, Amazon. My letter to the editor of the Washington Post "A Republic if you can Keep It" follows tomorrow.
Jakes Progress
(11,177 posts)lewis: "Editorial department is going to endorse Harris."
bezos: "Like hell they are."
lewis's cockroach of a statement does not preclude this scene. It only says beezy never read the endorsement.
GoYouPackersGo
(134 posts)Montauk6
(8,630 posts)"Well, LOOK who got out of another jam!"
Skittles
(159,374 posts)SERIOUSLY FUCKED UP
Hermit-The-Prog
(36,590 posts)JoseBalow
(5,184 posts)Shameless
IzzaNuDay
(603 posts)A principled person has fortitude. Just reading this drivel of an explanation leads me to believe Lewis has no principle or fortitude.
Jack Valentino
(1,329 posts)he was involved in that decision.
Washington Post---- they used to be a journalistic standard, back around 1974....
Now it seems they are New-York-timesish--- except I guess the New York Times actually made an endorsement this year--- after doing everything they could editorially to destroy the party which they eventually endorsed....
At this point, my favorite newspapers are the one in Philadelphia, and the Guardian-- which isn't even an American paper.
Actually I subscribed to the Guardian once, when it was further left and I was young and full of left-wing piss
relayerbob
(7,020 posts)I'd fire him, personally.
relayerbob
(7,020 posts)The Washington Post dies in democracy.
VOTE!